I've known companies he owned and it was filled top to bottom with mormons. Doesn't really matter how much he believes what he believes or doesn't. What matters is the group he aligns himself with. That group, being partially controlled by him. Romney is one of the major decision makers for his group, which means, whatever the hell he wants his groups' interest to be. Which is why he doesn't align with Republicans, because that's not the group he represents.
When you realize that Romney's interests are his own self interest, and his self interest is intertwined with the self interest of a whole lot of mormons and potentially a lot of rich mormon's thanks to Romney. Given the population of Mormon's in Utah, he's probably not in any real danger. Unless there's trouble there for some reason, but it's not going to be because of Trump.
Mugging and murders are violent, but if you look at the numbers it's actually a small minority. And those people could always be opportunists.
They're like batman, they're not going to kill you, but they'll give you permanent eye damage. That's how they think.
Take the guy who purposefully rolled up and killed that guy with the BLM tattoo on his neck. That guy had drank way too much of the koolaid. There's always going to be that guy, just as I said in my post.
Burning buildings is different than burning buildings with people inside. It's skating the line, and it's only possible because the major and the attorney journal positions in those areas have been infiltrated by radical progressive communists. It would be past the line in non-progressive areas.
The people who are coordinating are not looking to kill people (although I would entertain that they may want to make a point here and there). They are coordinating to terrorize the population for political purposes.
We're talking big picture here. If you think what could be happening, versus what is happening. They're not really doing more than terrorizing and destroying people's shit the majority of the time.
Conservatives don't do this because they're unorganized, leaderless, and self important. It's not that they wouldn't and if they wouldn't then they get what they fucking deserve.
I didn't downvote you, but they're not actually violent. They stop short of violence almost every time. Are there individual incidents, of course, but that's going to happen no matter what group it is. That's not a representation of the group itself though.
What they're doing is radical activistism, and their goal is to never cross a certain. However, they're told to skate on top of it.
The right is more violent, because they only are usually acting with an on and off switch, rather than using subversive and more dynamic tools.
So? Why is that?
We get it, you're clever. You noticed a thing. Now tell me why. Once you've told me why. Tell me how you too can be like them or make them be held to the same standards.
Identifying a problem isn't even the process. It's how you know to start a process.
The numbers don't matter. Who voted doesn't matter. It doesn't really tell you anything. All that matters is whether they decided collectively to go one way or another. The people voting yah or nah is then a political tool they use to their advantage to appease certain groups. The reality is that they're all the enemy. All of them.
That's not how climate change works though. According to them. Climate change is about changing the temperature by couple degrees, not having a shitty winter. They say the opposite shit when conservatives say the weather's real nice. Of course climate change science works the same as trans science, aka whatever's convenient to sell their agenda.
Yeah, stop fighting directly. Especially by yourself. Their power versus your power, they will win every time, since we don't use our power collectively. That guy could have been quiet and continued to use his power (while making money off his enemies, which is what they do to us).
No one cares if you make a point. What matters is power.
It's not about truth, it's about power. All they were looking for was an excuse. Since she kept providing them with excuses, it was only a matter of time. I'm surprised it didn't happen earlier. What really surprises me the most is that Jon Favreau stuck up for her and protected her for so long, because everything suggests he's part of the problem.
War in the age of technological integration and globalization has eliminated the right of weapons to label war and, with regard to the new starting point, has realigned the relationship of weapons to war, while appearance of weapons of new concepts, and particularly new concepts of weapons, has gradually blurred the face of war. Does a single "hacker" attack count as a hostile act or not? Can using financial instruments to destroy a country's economy be seen as a battle? Did CNN's broadcast of an exposed corpse of a U.S. Solider in the streets of Mogadishu shake the determination of the Americans to act as the world's policeman, thereby altering the world's strategic situation? And should an assessment of wartime actions look at the means or the results? Obviously, proceeding with the traditional definition of war in mind, there is no longer any way to answer the above questions. When we suddenly realize that all these non-war actions may be the new factors constituting future warfare, we have to come up with a new name of this new form of war: Warfare which transcends all boundaries and limits, in short: unrestricted warfare.
- Col. Qiao Liang and Col. Wang Xiangsui
Dunno, don't pay attention to Q stuff, I dismiss that kinda stuff as nonsense. I'm concerned with what is happening, not what could be happening. Most conspiracy shit is just people making excuses for inaction. Most of the time, the data is already there to make informed decisions. It's like Epstein, it doesn't matter if he killed himself, what matters is that he was allowed to be killed either through suicide or someone else. The people who were in charge of protecting him are at fault either way. So the focus should be on punishing and removing those people in the chain of command.
Lots.... gotta wait for all the people holding on for the last second to go away and give them some time to let it sink in. Since they weren't ready to do something when they had the opportunity.
After that we can get to doing actual work, because you'll all have no other option.
Being a realist isn't hoping for shit. Being a realist means you look for solutions that are available and viable. There is no Trump military plan.
There are many alternatives, everyone thinks there's only two options, give up or a civil war. I can tell you without a doubt, there are an infinite number of actions to take.
All you have to do is look at how we got to where we are right now, to know that the opposing side did exactly what we need to do, in our exact same position. Besides them knowing that what they did worked.
How do you define doom? Being a realist, and looking to find real solutions? Thinking that we need a civil war and we're all going to die? Or giving up and thinking that there's nothing to do done or that you can vote again in 2024? Because those are all different things.
It's fine to rah-rah-rah when the football game is playing, but not when it's 0-54, the game's over and you're hoping for a flag before everyone walks off the field.
Half of this place reminds me of those motivational posters, and those posters are for people who don't take action. People who take action, just take action, they don't need posters.
Fortunately, after tomorrow, we can move on, but I'm sure someone will figure out a way that he can still win. Match me!
Those are their old tactics.
They're now using the youtube model. Fuck over your independent creators and cater to the multi-national corporations. It's less overhead and it's more guaranteed money. You just do what they want, and they pay you billions.
They'll modify the system (government level and business level) so that it punishes and destroys all small businesses, while enriching the multi-national corporations who will funnel money to them with less overhead.
Those multi-national corporations originating from any country. Maybe the United States, maybe the CCP.
We're losing a war against politicians and multi-national CEOs. Basically the elite trying to make the world a giant third world country, unless you're them of course.
Amazon isn't a products company, it's a logistics company. Your solution obviously works when you can wait 2-8 weeks and that's fine. What we need is a logistics company that's purpose is to help these individual companies.
It means that we should be less like the Federation and more like Section 31. To ensure the stability of the Federation, we need to search out and identify threats to the Federation, and deal with them.
We can borrow "Maquis" motto for action.
I don't care about Trump. I care about myself and those around me. I only support Trump, because Trump was aligned with my interests. That's no longer the case. Doesn't mean he didn't do things, but it does mean that his interests no longer align with mine. This was never about Trump, he was only a symbol to organize behind and share mutual knowledge.
Time to move the fuck on and focus on the people, and not some idealized man. If you need that man to keep your motivations, sure, whatever, but I'm more concerned about myself and the people of the United States.
If we've learned nothing, it's that opportunity was squandered, rallying everyone together and then not using those moments to have those people take action in the world together. 5 years of gathering everyone together, and not building a network, not organizing, not creating things in the real world to combat the problems we're about to face.
Now the work is in our hands.
It's not about banning coal, it's about funneling money to his buddies.