I think per the constitution the President and VP have to be from the same party, so AFAIK the situation you described couldn’t happen. That said, yes vote in the runoff

Not OP, but I think what he’s saying is that the Constitution can be changed, but there’s a process for that. A justice can’t just rule against precedent or based on their personal feelings to change what the Constitution really means.

Does anyone have like a PDF or list of taking points we can use? It’d be helpful to have all the evidence in one place.