7
snacksthecat 7 points ago +7 / -0

The comments are all about how they can't find anyone other than Breitbart covering this.

6
snacksthecat 6 points ago +6 / -0

Damn, I thought it was a cross in wires where he was talking about voting and she about registration. But that's nuts.

Woman knows her stuff better than this snarky moron.

Top top top kek!

2
snacksthecat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ahhh the buzzwords! I can only get so triggered!

52
snacksthecat 52 points ago +52 / -0

"My credentials are my last name."

fucking losers.

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good readback of what Bobby found. You could tell in in presentation that he's super passionate about this and willing to follow the data wherever it leads.

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not that they're necessarily delusional; after all, the very places where they get and form their opinions from are heavily censored and editorialized.

With that in perspective, the top headlines we always see like this make total sense in a liberal echochamber upside-down universe.

The media and tech co's have categorically tried to accelerate the election process and squash any voice of doubt. But that is sill somehow not enough for the left and so they cry victim.

Okay maybe I take my first sentence back.

2
snacksthecat 2 points ago +2 / -0

It splits my damn sides thinking about these losers trying to weasel out of every situation in their lifetime.

c'mon man, just let me commit these felonies to cover up for these other felonies ... that were to cover up for the utter lack of enthusiasm in our entire party and failure to convince people to vote for our dud of a candidate

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Another vote for never.

But I have to imagine... if this thing pans out like it's looking, then there is some big criminality at play and naturally you could expect to see the smaller fish flip up the food chain.

But I seriously can't wrap my mind around how this all looks if prison time is in the equation for non-avg joes.

5
snacksthecat 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's so weird thinking back on election night and all the weird stuff that happened.

I distinctly remember people pausing on this pipe burst event. But have to admit, I didn't think twice about it.

22
snacksthecat 22 points ago +22 / -0

Weirdest timeline...

9
snacksthecat 9 points ago +9 / -0

IT'S HISTORIC TIMES WE'RE LIVIN' IN, BOYS

I look forward to the absolute torrent of memes that will flow in the days ahead.

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

warehouse.jpg

"room"

5
snacksthecat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bonus to a second term is maybe seeing that fool reenact liberal fanfiction on national TV again.

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well the dems' approach is to prop up a bunch of "influencer" accounts with bots / "low information voters" (as they like to call anyone who doesn't have a Bernie Sanders idol in their bedroom closet) to reach top comment on POTUS tweets just to screech:

CONCEEEEEEEEED

2
snacksthecat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Someone raised the question elsewhere about Dominion machines being used in Chicago, in regards to the data looking strange.

https://i.maga.host/USKTZ94.png

I do not know how to interpret this information, but can confirm that polling site used these exact shiny new machines that I had never seen in prior years.

https://i.maga.host/AoFJzQ6.png

Edit: I should mention that I don't know the source of the data used to produce this chart, so take it with a grain of salt. I feel it is also worth mentioning that in Illinois you cannot verify your vote online (who you voted for nor if it was counted). I walked my printed ballot (human readable) from the voting terminal, over to the counting machine where a poll worker told me to feed the ballot into the counting machine, and that when the 3 inch touch LCD screen displayed a checkmark, that meant my vote was counted.

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, my bad :) I overestimated the granularity of what that provided.

Probably a sign that I need to stop letting other patriots do all the heavy lifting, even if that just means informing myself better.

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there anyway to run the same analysis against the full Edison dataset? As I understood it, this was run on a JSON exposed on the NYT website vs the full scraped data set that anon wrote a script to pull.

I'm not sure if this even makes sense, just floating the question.

Edit: Looks like this has already been explored and I misunderstood.

2
snacksthecat 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't believe this website is free.

Groundbreaking stuff being uncovered by Patriots like OP!

AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE!

1
snacksthecat 1 point ago +1 / -0

He heard what he heard and he saw what he saw.

The claims are not insane, and the data (WOW) matches up.

The media puts out a disinformation campaign, while mail feds try to pressure him into changing the story.

Immediately following their bullshit smear campaign, the dude goes on fucking camera and doubles down.

Whistleblower + Project Veritas bring receipts in the form of recordings that (WOW again) match his claim that he's being pressured to back down.

My only question at this point this election is going to be prosecuted under RICO or full blown treason.

view more: Next ›