1
snwbrder697 1 point ago +1 / -0

Feel like this is part of the act. Same thing happened to Corey Lewandoski and Pam Bondi.

3
snwbrder697 3 points ago +3 / -0

They may not have power in the SC but there are certainly deepstate Judges that are more than happy to help them run the scam.

I don't understand why Presidential Election cases need to dick around in smaller courts for months. This should have been fast tracked to the SC weeks ago.

6
snwbrder697 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe I am not looking at this correctly but I see a 230 repeal as an excuse for Big Tech to ban all Conservatives since enraged lefties will go wild with lawsuits everytime someone posts "Orange Man Good". The Parler CEO posted yesterday that this would require them to do MORE moderation.

Wouldn't it be better to argue that a person's constitutional rights to life, liberty, etc. now apply to online as well? Meaning that banning someone is a violation of their civil rights and opens up Big Tech to lawsuits everytime they shadowban, suppress, fact check, etc.

6
snwbrder697 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

Basically you can go on Twitter and post "Orange Man Good" and some triggered lefty can sue Twitter for promoting hate speech because you like literally raped their eyes. Basically, they are spending all their income on civil defense in court.

48
snwbrder697 48 points ago +48 / -0

What is it with every Trump appointee stabbing him in the back? This has gone on for almost 4 years now.

7
snwbrder697 7 points ago +7 / -0

To me its kinda simple.

  1. Siphon Votes using Dominion
  2. Use the multitude of days AFTER the election to make up fake ballots to match
  3. Recounts and recanvases show 0 proof of fraud
  4. Complete the steal.
7
snwbrder697 7 points ago +7 / -0

A court case with actual evidence could take weeks or months. Just tank the case and appeal.

2
snwbrder697 2 points ago +2 / -0

can you check the site instead of being the 900th person to post this?

6
snwbrder697 6 points ago +8 / -2

This, additionally she is not bound by campaign finance laws.

1
snwbrder697 1 point ago +3 / -2

@Ali on Sidneys team said this was a legal clarification and nothing changes. He then tweeted TBA: Wednesday.

https://twitter.com/ali

3
snwbrder697 3 points ago +4 / -1

Im trying to figure out why they would release this. Sounds like there is a lot of irate Republicans over allegations of fraud in both parties?

7
snwbrder697 7 points ago +7 / -0

I would be a little worried about credit card safety. They are definitely based tho

4
snwbrder697 4 points ago +4 / -0

When are companies going to learn that the Twitter mob doesnt purchase any of their products and by bowing down they sabotage their own business.

48
snwbrder697 48 points ago +48 / -0

She did say that it didnt matter when she filed. She could file a month from today and they would have to throw the entire election out.

Sounds like Georgia is coming next week and multiple lawsuits after that by Wed or Fri.

1
snwbrder697 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saw a comment in another thread that stated back in 2008 then SOS Kemp was the ONLY SOS to call out Fraud during the Obama/Romney election. Its entirely possible this is just an act to expose fraud.

Or he could be a complete criminal thats trying to save his ass.

2
snwbrder697 2 points ago +2 / -0

Serious quesiton... what is the money going to do? I guess they assume they can pay off Supreme Court Justices? Roberts maybe but not the rest.

view more: Next ›