2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, I didn't read the article. I definitely have never been to that Hooters..

1
sociopathix 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's the AT&T building in Nashville

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's that time of year again, when miserable liberals who don't believe in anything take to Twitter and Facebook and try to make you miserable, too. Don't let them win! Merry Christmas!

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't remember where I first saw it, but when I saw it, the whole world came into focus and everything was somehow better. lol You're welcome to it!

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course they did. If they really stood by what they always say, they wouldn't have passed a single spending bill. But I only remember maybe two instances where there was a risk of the government not getting funded, and one time they let the US credit rating take a hit because they wouldn't negotiate.

I think that was the time that RINOs and Dems both needed to bribe some politicians with the triangle trade, but they didn't won't both spends in a single bill.

4
sociopathix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, and they want to keep the original bill and get it past Trump's veto for that reason. I have a feeling that Mitch and/or McCarthy got something in this deal that he/they really wanted, and if the bill doesn't pass, he/they did their part to sell out Trump too early and got fucked.

5
sociopathix 5 points ago +5 / -0

Uber fired 25% of its workforce and claimed it had enough cash reserves to be fine during COVID-1984. Several other companies have done the same thing.

I know why PPP was created and its purpose to stop this kind of thing, but if you would just give the money to the people rather than filter it through their employer, works out better for the employee because it's not also taxed.

I've also heard of companies saying, "The stimulus check was to help you guys, and the government money coming to us was to help us." They tried not covering the wages from the whole shutdown. No, dickhead, that money wasn't meant for you to buy a new boat or summer home. Fucking faggots.

15
sociopathix 15 points ago +15 / -0

The way I understood that law was that it didn't apply to me because fuck them.

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course she did. A lot of them did. They're ready for the looting phase.

3
sociopathix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why does the DNC do anything it does. We're talking about a group of people who think it's possible and entirely normal to transform yourself into a female simply by believing in it.

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the .01 you agree on? Air is good and water is tasty?

2
sociopathix 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some things are so insane that not even the Honorable Bartender from New York can agree with it. Now that's saying something.

7
sociopathix 7 points ago +8 / -1

Yep, new is an endless tirade of the same unverified, badly-written articles, things of little or no significance, or outright not true a lot of times. And then the occasional false flag "let's do racist things guys come on! ;D"

3
sociopathix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, have some friends in that situation. Barely do anything at work, do even less from home, still getting 6-figure salaries and bitching that their stimulus might be reduced.

1
sociopathix 1 point ago +1 / -0

And they will probably find both cars at the bottom of a lake in 50 years, if they find them at all (chop shop).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›