2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I may get flamed for this opinion; however, IDGAF.

Using analysis of numbers will rarely, if ever, prove fraud. However, what it can do is raise suspicion of fraud. THEN you investigate the possible fraud. In this case, the votes.

No one (in government) in these states wanted to even look to see if there was anything suspicious. When some serious fuckery was shown (from video), they just covered their eyes and said it doesn't exist. They refused to even look at the evidence being provided, and then claimed it didn't exist.

The sad thing is that they don't even care how this looks. The supposed news media is complicit. Big tech will ban you for even mentioning it. And the normies are too self-absorbed to care.

25
someoldcoderguy 25 points ago +25 / -0

Isn't it amazing. All of us stupid deplorables have figured that out without putting much effort into it. But the smart people can't seem to figure it out.

If people who commit crimes, cared about the law... then they wouldn't be committing crimes. What is so hard about that concept. Yet, the smart people seem to think that more laws will make them stop.

Amazing.

2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yeah, Hillary wasn't on the ballot.

1
someoldcoderguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Damn the torpedoes!

2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want this on a shirt. Except with one little change...

Schrodinger's evidence: if no one allows the evidence to be seen, does it exist?

3
someoldcoderguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, says the swamp creature. And Mr. Shapiro, just remember, the internet doesn't forget.

2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey Jackass, how do you think that the fraud was exposed. We turned out in huge numbers, and you lying cheating assholes stopped counting and had to inject a ton of fake ballots to give your guy the win.

1
someoldcoderguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will gladly help pay for that.

1
someoldcoderguy 1 point ago +2 / -1

If it is the FBI making the arrest, it will probably be President Trump.... bastards.

2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, you made it longer than I did. I turned it on, first thing was a COVID commercial, and I turned it right back off. Thirty seconds max. I can't stand regular TV anymore.

1
someoldcoderguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice the title reads, "Republicans", not "Republican voters".

3
someoldcoderguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, looks like we are going to have to cancel our 1/6 plans...

Yeah, no. Suck it leftists.

2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've always been suspicious of the so called "experts". Who designates them as "experts"?

Many at my work consider me an expert; however, I do not. I know there is a lot that I don't know. Do I know more than most at my work? Maybe, but I am still not an expert.

In my experience, most people who walk around claiming to be experts, are nothing of the kind.

2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

You want to see if the whole COVID-19 thing is a scan? Remove the financial incentive for hospitals to report everything as COVID. Though I am not a betting man, I would bet real money that COVID numbers would drop drastically if they cancelled the extra money.

1
someoldcoderguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good thing that I prefer to drive. They can cram that right up their caboose. Sideways.

3
someoldcoderguy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I imagine if you just consolidated all of the redundant departments, you would save a ton.

I have a former coworker who went to work for the state. He basically told me that every department has their own IT. So, DMV, has their own IT. State AG, has their own IT. State Treasury, has their own IT. I imagine it is the same at the federal level.

2
someoldcoderguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I second most of this. Only most, as I cannot confirm the 60s. I was not born yet. But the rest... I remember well.

11
someoldcoderguy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Right there with you, buddy.

view more: Next ›