2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah the anti-lynching thing from the Jussie hoax.

4
somethingnew 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, I think this is the wrong way to look at it. The quicker the senate deals with this BS, the better. It gets out of the news, and it does not slow down the judge approval process.

If a supreme court seat were to be vacant, we would be better off with the senate free to confirm another justice than if they were pre-occupied with impeachment.

4
somethingnew 4 points ago +4 / -0

The POS on CNN doesn't even attempt to push back, he just accepts it.

Can you imagine the media outrage if this were about a dem?

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

One is switching to R by new year's. The other is in a heavy red district and probably has no primary challenger. The third voted no only on one of them as cop out to try to appease both the crazy dems and the rest of his/her constituents.

That last one should be voted out as soon as possible because he/she is a snake.

5
somethingnew 5 points ago +5 / -0

The title of the PBS live stream was titled: "watch racist, cry baby getting fired"

5
somethingnew 5 points ago +5 / -0

I can still see it?

e: Nevermind, it has been deleted.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is undeserved. The Washington swamp fuck with us everyday, try to undermine the will of the voters, set the policy positions of the US government, and as a reward they get Christmas eve off? And to top it off, everyone else, people who actually produce things of importance, have to work and pay taxes that pay for their salaries.

This is absolute BS.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

If accuracy is not 100%, there will be more doubters than believers. and your larper's accuracy is at best ~50%. Notice no one came by to dispute that Q started with believe Sessions, Wray and Mueller BS.

Now first, you are not addressing my points you are just reading off of some script. Second, your point was that people would believe more if they do the work themselves. That only would be true if we start from the point that the source is some anonymous person.

Way more people would believe this information if it came from someone credible and in the know, like someone from the Trump administration. More people would follow it, and it would not require these cryptic messages that need to be interpreted.

Hell, if this Q was not a larper, he would just come out and say things in black and white and without any of this cryptic crap. If it pans out, it would spread way more since people would be more likely to believe it.

Example, gives a cryptic message about corn being harvested, and other BS. IG report drops and Comey is spelled Corney. People will easily dismiss it as just a coincidence.

vs.

come out and say that Comey's name will be spelled Corney in the IG report and give a hint or two about his involvement. A few days later, the report gets released and everyone sees that it accurate. Much harder to dismiss it.

Therefore, accurate and to the point predictions would bring far more followers and spread the message than this cryptic BS.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +2 / -1

The only people putting the pieces together are already believers. It is not like a bunch of fence sitters or liberals are following this Q BS, so that does not make any sense.

Putting out a bunch of cryptic messages on /pol no less, does not really help anyone break any kind of conditioning.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nah, Q is larp and always has been. One thread where a bunch of Q tards congregate doesn't change that.

Remember the TrUsT SeSsIoNs, TrUsT wRaY BS.

Prior to that it was TrUsT MuElLer. It was and always has been a bunch of vague BS that a bunch of people got duped into believing.

If Trump wanted to communicate something, he'd do it publicly. There is no logical reason for this Q crap.

If it is secret messages that Trump wants to convey to the masses and hide from the deep state, it would not work. If you can figure it out, so can a whole lot of other people.

3
somethingnew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not allowing them to cheat is stacking the deck against them apparently.

e: how can they be expected to win if they play on an even ground.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

> Perhaps most insulting of all is your false display of solemnity. You apparently have so little respect for the American people that you expect them to believe that you are approaching the impeachment somberly, reservedly, and reluctantly.

Calling her BS right to her face.

7
somethingnew 7 points ago +7 / -0

Imagine being so trashy that you would attack people while you are attending a wedding. People who are not at your wedding and who have absolutely nothing to do with you.

Also, bride looks like she's in her fifties. Figures that these POS are leftist degenerates.

3
somethingnew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah he will switch after the vote, so the vote will still be bipartisan. He is joining the GOP after meeting with Trump.

13
somethingnew 13 points ago +13 / -0

For context, he is the first dem representative switching parties due to his disagreement with dems about impeachment.

I wonder if there are more dems waiting to do the same thing.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that a husky or a coyote?

Seems like your neighbors are in disagreement.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh that sounds kinda cute.

23
somethingnew 23 points ago +23 / -0

There should be some big effort by the GOP to get these voters registered and to the polls on election days.

25M voters are the difference between winning in a landslide and losing disastrously.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›