3
somethingnew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Two dogs unleashed and unaccompanied? Who the hell is their owner?

4
somethingnew 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck that bitch. Who cares what she thinks?

She is as irrelevant as it gets.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why even invite these scum if the house is saying the president is illegitimate.

Fuck taking the high road, if these POS want to impeach, there should be no social gatherings and niceties between them and the white house.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Media blackout incoming because MUH out of limits.

Can you imagine if a Trump kid was being sued by a stripper baby mama for an illegitimate child, in 2015?

It would have been the lead story in every news outlet in the world. But Hunter is off limits.

9
somethingnew 9 points ago +9 / -0

Great news, but can we not link to the guardian please.

It is a left wing propaganda rag, and we should starve it out of clicks as much as we can.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

For me the arrow turns grey after ~5 minutes.

20
somethingnew 20 points ago +20 / -0

When Cruz pressed him on this later in this same exchange, he said that it was for someone else to determine whether it is prosecutable.

e: I think that specific employee has been referred for prosecution and is why Durham's investigation became criminal.

5
somethingnew 5 points ago +7 / -2

Barr hasn't been AG for 2 years let alone 3 and Durham was appointed less than a year ago. What are you on about?

I have seen you write this comment multiple times. Is this like an automatic response or something?

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Per this linked excerpt from the NYT, there is evidence that Durham has collected that calls into question Horowitz's finding that there was "enough evidence to launch an investigation into the Trump campaign".

Basically if true, then Barr should intervene and remove that line from the IG report.

Otherwise, it will be spun by the media to exonerate the FBI spying on the Trump campaign.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know that TD mods started this place, right?

e: if you don't trust them, this is probably the wrong place for you

26
somethingnew 26 points ago +26 / -0

"Had enough evidence to launch an investigation" my ass.

I fully expect this to be the leading headline in all MSM.

9
somethingnew 9 points ago +9 / -0

The picture shows non-white support at 33%. How can anyone say if that is from black people or not?

If the poll counts Hispanics as non-white, then 33% is not that surprising.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

That seems unnecessarily risky. what is the given reason that they don't give the rabies shot? As far as I know it does not have much side effects and rabies is still very lethal.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we have multiple subs now that we have our own site?

Something like:

Memes

News

Campaign Strategy

Investigations

etc.

11
somethingnew 11 points ago +12 / -1

The person you replied to seems to be more interested in identity politics than the person's actual record.

Notice he is asking for a "protestant man from middle America" to contrast with Judge Barrett (a catholic woman). He does not have anything to criticize about her record.

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +2 / -0

don't post google drive links.

Don't click on google drive links. If you are logged into your gmail account you might get doxed.

4
somethingnew 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not sure if you have any kind of backup system, but I suggest having a daily backup of your database in case cloudflare decide to be assholes.

view more: ‹ Prev