you posted about one day too soon, we'll know by noon tomorrow and not one moment before
and for the other people in this thread who aren't so full of hate, greatawakening.win is a sister site to td, feel free to hop in
info:
- section 230 currently shelters websites from being liable for a user's posts/uploads as long as the website isn't curating the content
- this is a good thing because otherwise you wouldn't be allowed to host any website that lets people upload comments or data without being liable. it'd kill the internet
- the problem is section 230 is being applied to websites that are curating their content. when twitter bans all right-wing people, they are basically a left-wing publisher now and should be liable for what's said because they explicitly are allowing those words and not others
imo section 230 is fine but it needs to be applied as written and not constantly flaunted by big tech
i'm warning people against selling their 401k, not against shifting assets around within it. no need to get triggered
montana isn't deep red by any means. it's libertarian by default and getting infested by libs. libertarians have no immune system against libs so it'll turn blue in a generation.
idaho is about the same but more traditionally conservative, as is east oregon and washington.
texas would probably be your best bet overall though
if you sell your retirement before you're 59 1/2, you pay a 10% early withdrawal penalty on all of it.
also, if you sell your retirement all in one year, you'll have a much larger income, pushing most of that income to being taxed at a higher rate than if you got it normally.
if you want to fuck libs without bleeding money out of the ass, then try to shift your stocks into companies that are based.
unfortunately ANTIFA would gleefully catfish that site relentlessly and there's no non-intrusive way of making sure everyone there is MAGA. imagine a bunch of people who hate you and want to destroy your life all trying to do so via a dating site.
but an ad-hoc solution would be the equivalent of R4R personals in the *.win domain and require vetted users only (ie long-time user with only MAGA posts)
non-reddit link: https://files.catbox.moe/mwoq7j.mp4
the "big picture" moves are 1) everyone in congress was finally forced to pick a side 2) big tech finally deplatformed a sitting president without pretense. important people are now on record supporting treason that they knew about and were warned about and big tech is documented having interfered with our election and politics in a heavy-handed way.
what happens next is one of two things:
- biden becomes president and we, the country, and the world are all fucked
- OR a lot of famous politicians are arrested for treason in the next few weeks and big tech gets broken up
and no matter what, the republican party as it stands now is completely in ruins. only 6 senators sided with trump. the rest of the republican senators have 80+million voters who will never vote for them again.
So if I am a full time salary employee for an organization my options are very limited correct?
correct. the big legit ways to lower your taxes are 1) get married to someone who makes less than you 2) have kids 3) put money into retirement 4) start a business that loses money
crypto based transactions.
owning crypto is a red flag for the IRS today and it's not anonymous. every transaction ever made is stored in the blockchain. cash or barter is the best
if you and your friends all trade services with each other then those would indeed be very hard to track
if what you're thinking of is not paying taxes, then here's a few things to know:
- there are "failure to file" penalties and separate "failure to pay" penalties. if you file your taxes but never send them money, you end up owing them far less than if you skip filing your taxes, too. if you want to protest on principle, this would be the way to do it: file taxes but not pay.
- any form of being a smartass and saying the IRS doesn't have authority triggers a bunch of angry IRS shit that's not worth fucking with IE doing a wesley snipes. these are called frivolous tax arguments and you get penalized severely for taking them and they generate huge red flags for years to come. not worth it at all. don't listen to the internet.
- a much better way to avoid paying taxes is to have lots of expenses. if you are getting paid as an employee (w-2) then you don't really have any ways of lowering your taxes apart from making lots of retirement contributions. donating to charities doesn't really do anything anymore.
- the best way to avoid paying taxes is if you are a small business owner or contractor, ie you file a Sch C. the most effective way to avoid taxes is to claim a large but reasonable amount of business expenses. the best way is lots of car miles and lots of advertising expenses. you can run your business at a loss for a few years in a row before they consider you to not be having a business.
Before invoking the powers under the Act, 10 U.S.C. § 254 requires the President to first publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse
Before invoking the powers under the Act, 10 U.S.C. § 254 requires the President to first publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807
it's still on
Before invoking the powers under the Act, 10 U.S.C. § 254 requires the President to first publish a proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse
old vaccines: give you a crappy version of a disease and letting your body figure out which antibodies to make to fight it
new vaccines: inject mrna that causes your own body to manufacture a part of the virus that is and then your body gets allergic to it. supposedly you gain antibodies to that part of the virus and your body magically stops using the mrna to generate things you're allergic to. they don't actually understand why injecting the mRNA works because for 50 years they all thought it wouldn't.
the reason this is called an "OS" is because it's generalizable to pretty much every disease: inject something that makes your body recognize a small part of the disease that stimulates your immune system.
in the best case scenario this will indeed cure many diseases -- which is likely why they've been sitting on this since at least the early 90s -- in the worst case scenario a significant fraction of the population develops chronic auto-immune disorders due to their body never turning off the manufacture of the virus parts, causing nonstop inflammation and rejection.
frederick the great was a cool historical figure
he tried to avoid being king for the first 30 years of his life, studying fag stuff like music and poetry.
then he was thrust into an unwinnable war in his early 30s. basically all of europe decided to gangbang young prussia before she could become germany (the history of europe can be understood as oscillations between a proto-germany dominating the continent and germany being picked apart by everybody else until it re-forms).
anyway, he fought completely outnumbered against most of europe for nearly a decade until one of the enemies, russia, got a new ruler who was such a personal fanboy of frederick that he unilaterally gave frederick a ridiculous peace treaty and then the rest of europe had to follow suit.
after that, frederick personally visited every part of his country for the rest of his reign, stamping out corruption and caring for his populace. prussia flourished under his rule and had one of the best and most disciplined militaries of the time.
decades later, when napoleon crashed through europe, he stopped his army at frederick's gravesite and said "if this man were alive right now we wouldn't have made it this far" or something to that effect.
also, frederick completely changed battlefield tactics with something called "the oblique order". basically the idea back then was you form lines and shoot at each other. but if you are able to flank their line (ie, being the top part of T to their l part) you can destroy them. consequently nobody wanted to get flanked.
frederick's tactic was to fix part of his line of troops such that they'd fight against way more enemies, giving the rest of the line freedom to swing around and flank. so instead of 10 vs 10, frederick would set up a 5 vs 10 and then have his 5 extra troops flank the enemy's 10 from the side or back. the only reason this worked, however, was because he and the prussian army drilled constantly and had the discipline to pull this off. normally a group of troops fighting a 5v10 pussy out.
if i only ever voted for people i agree w/ on gun control then i'd never vote for anybody.
and i'm also pro medicare-for-all because we already have socialized medicine, it's called going into the emergency room with no ID and no money where they are legally required to treat you if your situation is bad enough. so unless you're willing to let poor people die on the emergency room floor when their credit card gets denied, you're also for socialized medicine. the question really is how do we implement it in the way that costs the least amount of money, and the answer is to collectivize the costs, much like public utilities and roads and infrastructure.
in other words, instead of having a bunch of poor diabetics and dialysis patients going to the emergency room every week anyway, i'd rather just go ahead and pay for their preventative medical care.
as for her 5-year term membership in the CFR (which isn't the same as being a lifetime member)
When asked about her involvement in it, she said that while many in CFR did not share her worldview, "If we only sit in rooms with people who we agree with, then we won’t be able to bring about the kind of change that we need to see."
i could easily see myself doing something like that, too
fuck it i'm just gonna say it:
i was pro tulsi long before i voted for trump in 2016. it's okay to support multiple politicians when their beliefs mostly align with yours. not everything trump is for is something i'm for and not everything tulsi is for is something i'm for.
but i see many posts on here that are basically "tulsi surprisingly does something freedom-loving that we agree with, but wait, she's totally a secret evil globalist who is trying to pied piper us away. here's proof: she was a "young leader" on the world economic forum".
that's it. that's literally all they ever say. frankly i don't give a fuck about that. what matters is what she has done. and what she's done is call out and vote against tons of evil shit that the democrats and republicans have put forth. if her "long game" is to win my trust by doing a bunch of shit i agree with in order to keep getting elected, then that's fine by me. that's what ted cruz is doing too, by the way. he is as intellectually dishonest and cynical as it comes, but his actions are enough for me to stop caring about any hidden or cynical motives he may have. same with tulsi.
based on her actions, i would vote for tulsi over the republican establishment in 2024 at this point.
that would give balls
realistically: COBOL, c, or python
remember, this discussion is about UBI. the reason people don't like UBI is because they think "somebody has to pay for it". but the answer is the robots will "pay" for it. they are all slaves making shit for us forever and we can sit around doing random bullshit because they will depress both costs and wages to zero.
the problem is that wages and costs won't go down uniformly for everyone, and UBI is the way to smooth this over. the end point is everybody is unemployed, but the middle point is half the people are unemployed. and 3 billion people aren't going to be doing songwriting and spiritual mentorship -- especially not for pay.
robots are already better than the best person at many things (chess, go, optimization in almost everything)
there's nothing magical about the human brain, and there will be a time, likely in our lifetimes, when there is literally nothing we're better than AI at.
pick any activity and then look at how humans and AI compare and you'll see that the gap is closing. i'd actually like to hear something you think humans will always be better at.
right, in literally every prior instance you'd be correct. a steam shovel that does the work of 40 men doesn't replace 40 men, it just gives 40 men steamshovels so they can do 40x more work.
but in this case it is different and has zero historical precedent. this is because strong AI doesn't augment, it replaces. like i said, i wasn't exaggerating with my 300 IQ 12 ft robot example. that really is what it will be. and humans cannot compete with the combination of 1) better and 2) free.
if there are 10 robots per person, and each robot is better than the best person at literally everything, there is no room for "more jobs". there will just be more jobs for robots.
hard disagree
imagine a person with an IQ of 300, 12 feet tall, never sleeps, never gets sick, never asks for money, and whose memories can be instantly placed into another person's brain -- a person just like him.
now imagine 100 billion of them on the planet, all working nonstop at every conceivable job, even at the factories making those people.
of course, in practice that's not going to be how it is because it's not worth it to make such a general-purpose android, but functionally it will be equivalent. there will be no room for humans in such a world.
and once that world exists, you'd better hope there's a UBI system or else we will literally all be starved to death and nobody will care and history will never write about it.
looks like he's going to go camping and happened to bring a gun
the best is yet to come