1
sply1 1 point ago +1 / -0

People think everything on .win is also on the evening news. I don't watch MSM but when I catch a glimpse it's always about "Trump polls crashing after debate" and such like. I think OP is spot on.

"It matters not who votes, it only matters who counts" -Stalin or someone

1
sply1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd prefer prosecute. Obstruction of Justice?

3
sply1 3 points ago +3 / -0

For sure, I was thinking the BBC Business News division. It's all I'm familiar with, and it used to be non-leftist. But no longer.

7
sply1 7 points ago +7 / -0

All true but there's been a quite noticeable shift in the BBC's coverage of American politics. They now seemingly require at least one predictable liberal NPR mouth piece type to weigh in on any issues. At least with the Biz division which used to be devoid of such people. Now there's always at least one 'orange man bad' in their news coverage, regurgitating the usual DNC talking points.

4
sply1 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm starting to love 'hot mics.' So much I might even change my name to that...

1
sply1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not saying for sure, but could it be to catch copy/paste reposting on other sites? I've seen similar things on breitbart.

140
sply1 140 points ago +140 / -0

"Let's get back to the *narrative,*shall we, you're bad, we're good."

1
sply1 1 point ago +1 / -0

It effectively means the fed can never raise rates again, or we'd be unable to service the debt. ALMOST seems like a plot to weaken America with the full backing of all of DC. And the public lets out barely a whimper....

2
sply1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have to tell you that I was seeing lots of twitter errors yesterday that would not conform to the JS throttling theory and behavior I experienced in the past.

4
sply1 4 points ago +4 / -0

FFS anyone for head of FBI but the people Trump has picked so far.

8
sply1 8 points ago +8 / -0

No shit, we might've already 'stimulated' ourselves out of a fiscal future. Why would anyone hope they throw another couple TRILLION dollars down the drain? I can't figure it..

2
sply1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was just thinking that a non-focused tab would throttle the JS engine. Progressive enhancement is, well, trendy, but you start with an error page and build it up as the JS runs. Not sure that's what's going on, but I was applying occams razor. It happens when I Ctrl click on twitter links. But my testing wouldn't have uncovered legit throttling if you see the effect go away for a bit. That's how I tested. I'm not in QA :)

1
sply1 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I think they're setting up the possibility to claim the results are fraudulent. Remember the stories about the USPS being used by President Trump as a tool to suppress the vote? This is more of that same narrative.

5
sply1 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm pretty sure this is just a Javascript thing, at least in the case of opening a new tab with the link. Then the needed scripts don't run and you see a generic message. Not sure, but I puzzled on it a while ago when seeing similar behavior.

4
sply1 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's just my best guess, but I bet she promised certain state governors a federal bailout in exchange for tough lockdowns. She won't take any deal without that.

6
sply1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes. They've been a known problem going back many years.

3
sply1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because a lot of older folks, who're likely to be financially better off than the youth, had a hard time relating to the need for Trump to curtail immigration and globalism. That'd be my guess.

2
sply1 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's worse than a cackling laugh? A strained and fake-ass cackling laugh. smh

2
sply1 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a de-gendered version of Spanish. Latino/Latina => Latinx. In line with the whole pronoun craze. I dare anyone to speak whole sentences with all degendered nouns though, that's take a lot of practice I bet.

4
sply1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks, I was trying to understand this connection. I will direct my attentions elsewhere now.

5
sply1 5 points ago +5 / -0

What do they think is going to happen to them?

Absolutely nothing. Maybe they'll get 'slammed' in a statement from a senator.

2
sply1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly my sentiments, they figure running for office is also a shield for any criticism as it's 'not fair' to bring it up or something. They're trying to preserve the brand.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›