You're welcome. It has worked fine, with no problems, in the last three censuses.
...gain.
...Sorry, but it didn't keep the formatting of the Response Letter template when I cut and pasted it.
From: John Quincy [Adams], in esse c/o 1776 Sovereign Way [near: CA 94602] Oakland (02), California republic, u. s. of A. Service by: CERTIFIED MAIL® _______________________ To: Foreign, for-profit, commercial entity: “United States® DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE” U.S. Census Bureau [near: DC 20233-0001] Office of the Director Washington city (33), District of Columbia March 22, A. D. 2020 Subject: Your erroneously addressed mail and contents In Re: “your invitation to respond to the 2020 Census” dated March 12, 2020 Greetings Director Steven D. Dillingham, in esse, or duly-authorized live agent, Pursuant to Article One, Section Two, Clause Three of the organic Constitution, the only information you are empowered to request is the total number of individuals living at the private domicile, commonly known as 1776 Sovereign Way, Oakland (02), which is located within the territorial Boundaries of the republic state of California (est. A. D. 1849). In good faith, to comply with any applicable constitutional requirement, there are currently six (6) people living at this private domicile. Their “name, sex, age, date of birth, race, ethnicity, telephone number, relationship and housing tenure” have absolutely nothing to do with apportioning direct taxes or determining the number of representatives in the House of Representatives. Therefore, neither Congress nor the U.S. Census Bureau has the constitutional authority to make that information request a component of the enumeration outlined in Article One, Section Two, Clause Three. In addition, one cannot be subject to a fine for basing one’s conduct on the Constitution, because that organic Instrument trumps the exclusively territorial municipal laws passed by Congress for the District of Columbia. “Neither branch of the legislative department [i.e. Congress], still less any merely administrative body [such as the U.S. Census Bureau], established by congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen. Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168, 190. We said in Boyd v. United States, 116 U. S. 616, 630, 6 Sup. Ct. 524, and it cannot be too often repeated, that the principles that embody the essence of constitutional liberty and security forbid all invasions on the part of government and its employees of the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of his life. As said by Mr. Justice Field In Re Pacific Ry. Commission, 32 Fed. 241, 250, ‘of all the rights of the Citizen, few are of greater importance or more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault, but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would lose half their value.’” Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 479 (A. D. 1894) Take Due Notice: The above United States Supreme Court case has never been overturned. Verily and truly, _________________________ , A constituent Member of the Body Sovereign of these “united states of America” living peacefully and lawfully upon the soil of California.
...definitely whoosh.
The truth is the truth, regardless who the messenger might be. FYI: I don't have a "position" I merely research the facts. If you can't be bothered to do your own due diligence, I really don't care what you think.
I thought so too. It had links to some very good background information.
...No, it was the lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald. LOL
You're welcome.
You're welcome.
"We are all born ignorant, but to stay ignorant is a choice." Chinese proverb
How about Richard Grenell and Kayleigh McEnany?