She said it during one of the debates. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/donald-trump-slams-tulsi-gabbard-for-claim-that-he-supports-al-qaeda-2079369

He had plenty of pro-white messages too. Pro hispanic. Pro American. I happen to think he was able to form the most diverse movement behind a republican probably ever. And that's why he won by such a huge margin that they had to rig the election to stop him. Yes, We DID win. The fact that it was rigged doesn't have to do with the diversity of Trump supporters. They wouldn't have rigged it if it was less diverse?

It was all about black unemployment? I don't think it was. There was so much more to Trump's message.

I didn't even give my opinion on the question. I was just honestly asking a question. I tried to word it as neutral as possible. Is there a way I could have worded it better without coming across as a shill? Or is asking a question just being a shill period?

No, she's positioning for a job in media. Most likely with Fox News. There is absolutely zero chance she comes close to even sniffing a candidacy as a republican at a state or local level. Let alone as a republican presidential candidate.

She's not in congress any more. I'm guessing she was told behind the scenes she was told she was persona non grata after her feud with the "queen of warmongers" so she decided not to run for re-election.

Is this the same Tulsi Gabbard who said Trump was a terrorist and defender of Al-Quada? She should practice what she preaches.

So would the MAGA movement be stronger if it were less diverse or more diverse?

McConnell made 2 back to back presidents his bitches. He stonewalled Obama and refused to even acknowledge his SCOTUS pick. Then he barreled through 3 of his own SCOTUS picks during Trump's presidency. The final one at the 11th hour. Say what you will about Mitch but he is effective at what he does. Pelosi and Schumer could only dream of pulling the moves McConnell does.