^ This person gets it.
Correct. The jury is far from impartial. They know that if they decide a certain way they will be doxxed.
Nothing will happen.
Justice is dead. The jury will vote how they see fit to save their own skins. They know what's at stake if they vote a certain way.
The rule of law is non-existent. It's mob justice now.
Trust the science! No, not that science.
There is zero chance a not guilty verdict will happen. The jury members will vote to save their own skins. This trial will not be decided on the facts of the case or the law.
I second this recommendation. Just watched the complete series last year and find the parallels to today uncanny.
In my house when we watch any media, it's tv and movies from the 70s, 80s, and 90s. It's sad to see how far we've fallen so quickly...
The current governor of Virginia.
I'm actually impressed at the amount of extra work OP went through to get "their" wrong. I mean, it's not like they took the lazy route and just went with "there". An apostrophe was used!
"COMMON SENSE"
Delete Facebook
Now, this might be tinfoil hat territory, but what if the mRNA instructions to make these new antibodies do harm to your natural antibody process, meaning that to even fight other mundane disease you'll need a constant update in the form of new mRNA instruction gene therapy vaccines? The subscription model of constant OS updates comes to your immune system. If you stop the updates, you'll be left with a subpar immune system.
But I'm sure this is just crazy talk. Ignore me.
Should be a Glock not a SIG. But still, nice one.
It's almost like they have no principles or moral compass.
Trials are pointless and justice is dead if the fate of the accused is determined by the court of public opinion...
Uh, sorry to break it to you. But we are already there, my fren.
This has the potential to displace and impoverish people who refuse the vaccine.
This is the entire goal.
The time to stand up is now. We won't change it once it is deeply imbedded.
It's too late.
that verdict
Which verdict is that? And are you basing this on the merits of the case as presented in court, or the reality of the jurists afraid to vote a certain way to protect themselves?
Regardless of the merits of the case, the jury will vote to protect their own skins. They know that if a certain verdict is passed, their names and addresses will be leaked immediately. It is certainly not an impartial jury.
Sorry, no standing.
Sounds like you've had too much to think, citizen.
Someone who has been streaming media fear mongering into their brains 24/7.
Correct. And this is all the jury members will be thinking about when they are supposed to be deliberating.