Sounds like the shills have gotten their latest talking point about “mRNA vaccines don’t alter your DNA”. That probably means the globohomo elite pedophiles have done some polls and realized that this “altering your DNA” thing is spooking the normies. I notice these newbies making this argument are super aggressive too.
They have trusted the TV their entire life so they don’t really know how to stop trusting it. Even when they know, intellectually, that it is all lies, they cannot quite make that paradigm shift and truly believe it. Part of it, I think, is an inability to fully process how evil the elites are, or that they see as subhuman cattle. It’s such a foreign concept to people that other human beings could view the world that way that they kind of cannot believe it.
The end of WW2 is sort of an arbitrary date and I’m sure history before that is completely grabbled too. However, it seems like the end of WW2 is when the Communist Infiltration of the West really got started, and that’s when the Clown World nonsense really started to get going. At this point we are like three layers deep into Clown World, so the latest Clown World lie is now built on two previous lies, which is why debunking the nonsense is sometimes difficult.
Before WW2, just based on the media I have seen from that period, there seemed to be less overtly clownish Clown World nonsense. Like I don’t think you could have sold men in 1942 the idea that sucking on a woman’s ladydick didn’t make you gay, or that yes, obviously men can get pregnant. So I feel like the people of that time were more based in truth and when I listen to them, I don’t feel as intensely manipulated by the grabbled nonsense as nowadays.
The problem with your argument is it’s not 1965 anymore. Yeah, MLK’s dream sounded nice fifty years ago, but it might be time to actually consider some empirical data here. Or is fifty years of a social experiment not enough to determine the degree of success or failure of the experiment.
Here is what I believe the fundamental flaw in MLK’s dream is: it only works if everyone agrees to it. If ALL the races agree to judge by content of character and not color of skin, then perhaps a true meritocracy could exist. But we have fifty years of data showing that the non-white races are NOT interested in this. So now we have a situation where one race is playing by the rules of MLK’s dream, and none of the others are. This is not sustainable. Nor is it even truly MLK’s dream, but a twisted, hobbled, misconceived version of it. And yet, this might be inevitable, as human beings might be biologically wired towards tribe-based thinking and in-group preference. And if that is true, then thousands of years of evolved instinct cannot just be wiped out because some dude made a speech, and we should be honest about that.
Except then 2020 happened and all the trust in the medical community has been destroyed. They did to themselves. We watched them falsify a peer-reviewed study to ban a cheap cure to a virus in the middle of a worldwide pandemic. Once you accept that is how far doctors and scientists are willing to go to serve their masters and push an agenda, then what else is possible?
You cannot expect the old bullshit about doctors and the Hippocratic Oath and the sanctity of science to hold true once that happens. Otherwise you’re just living in denial of the new information. I know this triggers a lot doctors who feel they are owed our respect. Doesn’t work that way, doctors. You guys did this to yourselves and the mask is now off. We see who and what you people are. We see you have been in the pocket of Big Pharma this whole time. 2020 was just the year that finally proved it.
And this point ALL medical and scientific research from AT LEAST 1945 until today should be considered suspect and unreliable. We no longer know what documents were forged, who was blackmailed, who paid off who, what was suppressed, and what was faked. To get out of this mess, huge volumes of “established research” will need to be thrown out and done over by non-corrupted people and organizations.
I start by framing their position and boxing them in. Opening salvo in a debate against a liberal: “I just don’t trust these huge corporations. I think they don’t really care about us. I think they’re all about profit and we’re all just numbers on a spreadsheet to them.”
Liberals think this is their position (it isn’t) so when you start by taking what they believe to be one of their fundamental beliefs away from them, it totally disorients them. They sense you disagree with them and want to kneejerk argue, but what are they going to say? They DO trust the big corporations? It’s NOT just about profit. So they are trapped.
From here, just keep tying your positions on every issue back to your fundamental distrust of these huge international mega-conglomerates. Bonus points if you know the names of the six corporations that control all media and are able to list them. This really shuts a liberal up because they are usually shooting their mouth off about shit they haven’t researched so when you are able to name specific corporations like that, they get worried. Their energy shifts from wanting to win the debate to wanting to not look stupid or be exposed as a politically shallow person.
Now the liberal might try to challenge you and claim that they ALSO don’t trust the big corporations. That is fine. Let them make that statement. But then challenge them to name ONE political opinion or public policy they support that runs counter to the big corporate media?
At this point they will likely draw a blank because they either don’t have any opinions outside the corporate media’s approved opinions, or they DO secretly disagree with some things but will be too scared to state those publicly. Either way you have essentially proved the point.
If on the other hand they do offer some opinions and beliefs that run counter the corporate media, then that’s fine too. Use that as common ground. Now they are boxed in to emphasizing their independent thinking, and from there, you should be able to gradually talk them out of their kneejerk brainwashing responses. The trick those is to not be cruel to them or shame them too much during this process. If you do that, they will be more inclined to retreat into their position and double down on the aggression and the corporate nonsense. That’s when you get some construction worker telling you yes, he would totally suck on a man’s ladydick and no, that is not gay, are you crazy? You know the dude wouldn’t actually suck the ladydick but he is just being stubborn. He just wants to win and feel like his side is right.
Honestly it’s almost like being a hostage negotiator or something. You have to delicately walk these people back into some kind of normalcy and the spirit of polite debate. You have to show them disagreement is okay. And you have to control your own emotions so they do not have a threat response, which is how they have been trained. You just have to be calm and reasonable and kind long enough that their fear response starts to gradually subside.
Often times, after a few hours, these people will start to loosen up and tell you all sorts of secret conservative positions they have. They almost get giddy and attached like you have shown them a way to think for themselves without giving up their self-image as a “good liberal”.
They also seem to try to make their insults and arguments match ours. Like when they responded to the Clinton Foundation scandal by inventing a Trump Foundation scandal, or when Karen meant a white woman who demands to speak to the manager to exert control over others and then they changed it to white women who don’t wear a mask, or when they mirrored snowflake, or when they responded to the Flynn unmasking scandal by inventing this term “anti-masker” and assigning themselves the role of mask enforcement. This shit is constant with them.
David Berlinski explains how the Darwinian theory of evolution doesn’t meet the requirements of the hard sciences (5 minutes): https://youtu.be/SOtGb8hKyWE
A longer conversation on the subject: https://youtu.be/noj4phMT9OE
The problems are mathematical (lack of time), the fossil record not corresponding to the theory, lack of observed species change in the lab (which should be observable with certain forms of bacteria with a life cycle that only lasts seconds), and public confusion around the difference between adaptation and evolution.
Nick is shit too. He’s like a mini Ben Shapiro. There are even clips of him with the Never Trumpers saying Never Trumper type shit back in 2015/2016. I also suspect he might be a MtFtM tranny, meaning he went on the hormones for awhile to try to change his gender, but then tried to go back. Just my theory. But there is something very off about him, like his body didn’t develop properly during puberty or something. I think he is controlled opposition. And Charlie Kirk is a cuck.
The people scared, locked away at home, sleeping in a mask and sanitizing everything are under a total illusion. They are able to look out the window and see streets filled with invisible virus. Meanwhile a bunch of people have been living perfectly normally, acting as if the virus does not even exist (it doesn’t), and yet - no problems for them. And when they look out the window at the streets, they just see normal streets. They don’t see millions of invisible deadly germ particles.
You wanna go where people are all the same. You wanna go where nobody knows your name.
Doo doo doo doo doot doo. Doo.
Yeah I don’t really buy this idea that women raping men is a big problem in society. And I mean, unless the chick has a gun, I don’t even see how it is physically possible. Just push her off you. She’s a woman. She isn’t strong. Even if she has a knife, just catch her wrist and twist her arm back. Who are all these weak ass dudes out there getting raped by women? The whole thing feels like a media creation to emasculate men and make them think they are weak victims.
Now a man being raped by another man, that is something I am actually able to picture, and I think that DOES happen. When 6’7” 300 pound Tyrone comes at you with a hard-on, that wouldn’t be a joke.
This video excerpt gets the point across in about five minutes.
The problem is you’re just repeating old bullshit from the past. Stuff from textbooks. Stuff from the media. Stuff from these same globohomo elites. But we now know it is all a big scam. We know they see us as cattle and feed us all lies. We know they forge peer-reviewed studies to suppress cures to diseases.
Just step out of everything we’ve ever been taught by the elites (it is all lies), and just think about it with common sense. Obviously injecting babies with fetal tissue and heavy metals is not a good thing. You could write another 500 paragraphs of text trying to justify it and it wouldn’t change that obvious fact.
I think anyone who immigrated - even legally - to a western nation in the past fifty years should be forcibly deported back to their home country. Unless your ancestry to the land goes back three generations, I don’t even consider you a real citizen. Is that not enough for you? How would you go further? Is there a step beyond forcibly deporting someone who legally moved here fifty years ago?
I am saying that we are better off trying to unite the races against the Covid tyrants for now. The whole world is walking around with muzzles strapped to their face. Anyone who pushes back against that is good, no matter what their race.
People forget that the media did a “Russian Collusion” narrative every day for two years. Does anyone remember this?
Every day, for two years, the media was in a state of total hysteria for something called “Russian Collusion”. The story was that Putin had hacked the election of 2016 and had now installed his puppet, the new Literally Hitler, to turn America into a tyrannical dictatorship. This was just presented as a given fact and we were all told, every day, for two years, that the country was in crisis. Does anyone remember this at all? Russian Collusion?
And the entire time we said, “It’s all a media hoax. They are making it up out of thin air.” And the true believers in Russian Collusion, who could feel and see the Russian Collusion all around them, and the devastation and fall out from the Russian Collusion was hurting them every day, and we said no, no, that is just media fear and panic. It’s not real. There is no Russian Collusion. The Russian Collusion is not coming to get you. And they told us to shut up, the intelligence experts were all agreed, the media couldn’t make all this up, and Mueller was going to prove it all, and then they would be vindicated.
After two years of this, Mueller finished his investigation and said, “No Russian Collusion”. We thought, “All right, well at least now they will see that the media has been selling them nonsense for two years straight now. Mueller was their metric, not ours, and he still failed, so surely they will open their eyes to the truth.”
But it didn’t work out that way. They just dropped it and went straight into the next media hysteria. People don’t even remember “Russian Collusion” anymore. They might have some dim memory of it, but they forget this was a daily hysteria for two years. If you turned on the TV for two years, that would be the headline: “Breaking News: More Russian Collusion!”
You are too trusting of authority.