1
sureyeahokay 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, it's worth noting that on some rulings by judges the judges did in fact mention the substantial evidence of fraud but that their ruling did not take that into account because chances are their ruling wasn't over the fraud but over some other legal issue.

In fact, a John Hopkins analysis showed there hasn't even been any significant deaths related to age,

sounds promising. do you have a link to those?

2
sureyeahokay 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was hard enough to pull off the presidential steal.

how? i mean if they can just change the votes on the machines what's the difference? i don't get it.

Some things were just clear constitutional violations.

what do you think would be the strongest example

Trump gained over 14 million votes since 2016. How did Biden go from a two time losing presidential candidate to get more votes than anyone in history?

eh, i dunno, dems would've voted for literally anyone that wasn't trump

1
sureyeahokay 1 point ago +1 / -0

he's a really good dude, super smart, and we have a lot of time to talk about stuff.