1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

Millenials weren't even able to vote when the Patriot act was signed. America was sold out by the boomers. What we're seeing now would not have been possible without decisions made before the millenials were born.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it were practical I would but until the shooting starts there's no point even talking about it. We know what populations are getting the most abortions and it's just not worth stopping 10 of them to maybe get 1 decent citizen at the cost of 9 room temp IQ gangbangers. It's a luxury to consider what the children of savages deserve, one that we under a globalist regime do not have.

0
tabularasa_556 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm not even sure what you're trying to say. Blacks are just as bad as illegals in terms of what they do to the country. Abortions (and their natural tendency to shoot each other) are the only things keeping them hovering around 13% of the population. Without them, whites would just have more welfare leeches to subsidize.

The people getting abortions are not the people you want to be a part of the country. There's not enough Rittenhouses to kill them all ourselves, why would you want to stop them from ending their own bloodlines?

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably because before Trump there were generations of Americans who didn't have an example of what America first looked like. W? Romney? McCain? These were the best the republicans had to offer, apparently. They would talk big against the dems but when it came time to act? Patriot Act, impeach for nothing, keep Obamacare.

Then Trump showed up representing the will of the people and suddenly it became a lot more difficult for the GOP to pretend to fight with the dems, as he actually pushed for legislation that would fuck with globalists and help normal Americans. They couldn't afford to push that agenda, and were exposed as the anti-American grifters they are - just like the dems.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't usually post Abbott hate and this is obviously good but but is he still letting in 200k+ illegals per month?

6
tabularasa_556 6 points ago +6 / -0

It says the HIll, but this is a Bee headline?

26
tabularasa_556 26 points ago +26 / -0

Or, hear me out here, we could just end the China Virus restrictions anyway.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, so I'm sure you would support arresting all the criminals and traitors who actually did that, as well as the officials who protected them from any charges, and anyone who made donations to them.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

The rioting thing didn't work, think we'll try the BLM peaceful protest strategy of throwing molotovs into cop cars and detonating IEDs near federal buildings next time, if any of us manage to survive the seasonal flu. It might kill .03% of us but we'll press on

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'll be searching forever. There's no reason to be scared of the disease or to get the injection so we won't. You may continue to cower in your apartment with your triple masks while you wait for your next booster shot, pretending we're the ones who are dumb and scared, we'll just continue to go about life like normal.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is it with you and needles? They could deliver the exact same thing in the form of a dime sized pill and I still wouldn't take it.

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

"You guys are weak unlike me who sought an experimental injection to protect me from a virus with a 99%+ survival rate"

Maybe we aren't fat fucks and don't need to be worried about dying of the flu.

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which means it's an aggravating factor. Defunding the police did not cause gang shootings it just increased the number. Why are there gang shootings to begin with - that's the "real problem".

5
tabularasa_556 5 points ago +5 / -0

lol what. Do you think there were no gang shootings in Chicago before the "Defund the police" movement? Chicago has been a bullet riddled shithole for some time.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'd definitely try, but it wouldn't really work out for the same reasons you couldn't fill a company with black people or H1Bs. Everything would turn to shit pretty quickly and they'd end up hiring men even if it meant paying them more just so they could get work done.

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

That and they are permitted by the feds and big tech to organize on whatever platform they want, in addition to having people who get paid to do the organizing, many get paid to "protest" as well.

The fact that they have nothing to lose factors in I'm sure but it doesn't really matter since in the areas they usually riot at they can throw molotovs at police cars and the DAs will drop any charges. Wasn't there a lawyer that did that exact thing? It's not like they're all nobodies with no career. Even the ones with specialized jobs don't need to worry about consequences.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

The idea that all power and internet will be intentionally stopped for any prolonged period of time when such a thing hasn't happened in even the most authoritarian countries on the planet right now is actually far fetched, but you're right that if you wanted to prepare for an actual doomsday scenario where the elites aren't in control but are hiding in their bunkers for fear of nuclear bombs, then yes, crypto doesn't have any value and you'd be better off investing all your money in your own fallout vault. Then again fiat money in banks would have no value either, since obviously the 1's and 0's in your account don't exist without a computer to display them.

Yeah you can't go wrong with food water and bullets, but I think most people just can't feasibly store their entire net worth in tangible goods.

0
tabularasa_556 0 points ago +1 / -1

In the same way every country that went through this socialist inflation used their wheelbarrows of trillion dollar marks to buy a loaf of bread, sure.

Even China hasn't turned off the internet but if you think the US will disable it forever then sure just hoard silver.

3
tabularasa_556 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, they don't, and they can't, it's decentralized. At most they can track transactions off of a wallet tied to your name, and they can regulate exchanges, but they can't stop someone else from accepting crypto from you for goods or services in the same way that they can't stop you from paying cash at the grocery store.

If you use Monero they can't even track the transactions.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

inflating

I don't know what crypto you're referring to but BTC is deflationary by nature. It has a fixed supply. You cannot simply print more.

downright disappearing?

And you think what, because fiat currency is a physical thing that it can't just disappear? But that's one of the regime's goals. Inflate it into worthlessness and replace it with a digital currency that they can personally control your use of (that you cannot access without sufficient social credit). You'll still be able to burn your paper money I guess, can't light your fireplace with crypto.

3
tabularasa_556 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plus the next plandemic will legit kill lots of people. Try refusing masks/shots then.

Do you have a plan to just disappear into the woods and be 100% self sufficient with no contact with anyone outside that area, or do you plan to buy a hazmat suit and install a decontamination room outside your house? If they release an actual lethal disease you won't be banking on chinese masks or more mystery juice to save you.

3
tabularasa_556 3 points ago +3 / -0

What the fuck lol. A "crowd"? It's like 5 people tops. They weren't screaming, at least not the usual hysterical, unhinged screaming leftists usually do, maybe they were speaking a bit loudly but it didn't seem threatening. She wasn't hiding either, she walked out and washed her hands in the middle of their speech.

Seriously, what the fuck is this headline? How does this video translate to the description we got? It's just a group of activists pestering her.

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

So be it. Then nobody has an excuse for not using them anymore.

Even today if there were to be an event where a some tyrant got shot """unprovoked""" (although the past 10 months have been nothing but provocations), you would see people here calling the shooter a glowie, false flag, "they'll use this as an excuse to crack down harder" type shit.

The second they start physically trying to take guns all that goes away. Every time a fed or politician gets shot it won't matter whether or not the guy that did it was a glowie, it won't matter if the feds plant CP on their computer after a shootout, the response will be "they deserved it" and "good news, who's next"

3
tabularasa_556 3 points ago +3 / -0

If the military is purged then when a civil war starts who will stop the Chinese from being invited in? If we have no missiles or aircraft under control of military Patriots, Chinese troops will offload in west coast ports en masse.

If the military isn't purged who is going to stop them? The military will be ordered to help the Chinese with whatever it is they're doing. We've got random terrorists just running off of military bases right now and nobody is doing anything about it, individual patriots going rogue and commandeering aircraft to destroy Chinese ships is a fantasy.

view more: Next ›