4
tabularasa_556 4 points ago +4 / -0

Explain why China needs to launch a military offensive when they have the ability to purge our own military without any hardware.

What would they do afterward that they couldn't just order potato to do now?

3
tabularasa_556 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also because it's pragmatic now that it's clear the US can't be trusted

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +2 / -1

Linux is great if you don't use any niche programs or peripherals. If you do good luck finding and installing drivers and adapters for all that shit if they even exist.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know if it's "no black people in America" exactly it's just people want 1 (one) single place on earth where white people are allowed to be the majority and nobody will complain about it and try to force diversity. Every other race is allowed to be a majority in their own countries and nobody says they need diversity there (except Japan I suppose but they've been largely resistant to that bullshit)

I don't need to thinly veil anything when I say any 90%+ black area in the US is a crime-ridden shithole and nobody should want that.

4
tabularasa_556 4 points ago +4 / -0

What makes you think that? Was he known for anything other than Yugioh?

3
tabularasa_556 3 points ago +3 / -0

The issue with that is it doesn't actually apply to "highly skilled workers", pictures of mission control at SpaceX aren't full of Indians who can barely speak English. If you're working on a project where failure would mean something catastrophic either in terms of human life or finance you aren't going to be taking your chances on a budget foreigner (unless you're the government).

6
tabularasa_556 6 points ago +6 / -0

They definitely aren't trying to "preserve freedom" but they actually have the goals of improving the positions of their countries which is counter to what the global communists do which puts them in a different bloc.

by Moebius
0
tabularasa_556 0 points ago +1 / -1

No and I'm confused as to where you got that Idea. I am saying it's disappointing that people are still using it despite knowing the people who maintain it and profit from your activity there hate you.

by Moebius
0
tabularasa_556 0 points ago +2 / -2

I don't even know where to begin with this. What is "it" that you think isn't working? The top comment on this post was doing the bare minimum of investigation so something is working. It's unfortunate that the overall post was made at all but at least when it gets made here we have people calling it out for being fake.

Who is "they"? What group are you referring to "at patriots.win" that I'm not a part of?

by Moebius
4
tabularasa_556 4 points ago +7 / -3

Or, or, hear me out - rather than doubling down on believing and propagating garbage like this, they just learn how to verify the stories on their facebook feed? Like we should expect people to?

Well, I would expect people to have stopped using facebook altogether knowing they want you enslaved but much like turning off the NFL that's still too much to ask.

4
tabularasa_556 4 points ago +4 / -0

You mean like how they had every media outlet and actor supporting the vax and how it was repeated 24/7 for not just 2 weeks but months and then I - hm, that's odd. I never supported the vax. Why is it different with a draft?

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well shit that changes everything. Here I was thinking all these women who needed abortions all the time were being irresponsible but if they're just waking up pregnant all the time without having sex I'll have to reconsider my stance on the issue.

14
tabularasa_556 14 points ago +14 / -0

I saw a twitter thread on this claiming they "tried to hit the car to get him to stop."

Yeah the sensible thing to do when a violent mob is surrounding you and attacking your vehicle is to stop.

Every time I hear about a car "ramming into protestors" or whatever it's never actually what happens. Except for that one time when BLM was camping on a highway in the middle of the night around a blind turn. Those bitches went flying

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

isn't easy or cheap.

How much shit do you think they can fit in their section 8 apartment? It's one truck rental.

I bet that's what they thought in South Africa too...

Before they banned abortion in some regions, you mean? Or is that a completely different discussion with completely different circumstances?

You should be more concerned with the growth of demographics whose first instinct isn't abortion like the hispanics.

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

See I hear from everyone else how the libs fly like locusts to every red state because they don't actually want to live with the results of the policies they vote for. I guess that's just about white people? In any case blacks tend to have late term abortions (16~22yo) in the form of gang shootouts any time they start becoming too numerous. They will cull themselves.

3
tabularasa_556 3 points ago +3 / -0

What effect would a ban on abortion in Red States have on the population of future Democrat voters aka non-whites, and the future of our country as a whole?

I think it's just as likely they flee to somewhere they're free to kill their children and everything is better. We should be aiming to make life as intolerable for them as possible in red states so they will stay out.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you've described is a specific type of vaccine. I'm pretty sure any treatment that would confer immunity and disrupt transmission of a disease would be considered a vaccine for that disease. The specific mechanics of that don't necessarily need to be the inert virus thing.

That said the mRNA does none of it so yeah, it's not a vaccine.

7
tabularasa_556 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's more like whites are the only ones where supremacist is used as an epithet. It's cool to be a black supremacist. It's okay to put "pride" after any race, nationality or tribe except white.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy shit quit being dishonest. When we used to be in the office I watched some Indian lady shopping online all day, not even on her phone but on the company computer. I - or anyone else - could just as easily be focused on playing candy crush.

Just admit there's no difference in the amount of work that gets done. If someone wants to slack off they will.

0
tabularasa_556 0 points ago +1 / -1

building connections and networking.

Why the fuck does management care? Why do you care? If they're okay with that how would they not be okay with me taking online courses on the clock?

playing Monster a Hunter on Steam during work hours, you’re not contributing anything to your team or the company at all.

Let's say hypothetically, I am. My laptop is 1 foot away. If I get an email I can respond instantly. If someone needs me to do something I can do it immediately. How is that not "available to work"?

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not saying they wouldn't do any work, just less of it.

I don't really understand the dynamics of that then. What I do has specific goals that need to be completed in a set time. If the goals are completed in time, things are good. If not, things are bad. If you're working from home and the goals are still completed on time, what exactly is the issue? That you're doing 'less work' somehow?

That's exactly what I'm saying.

Really? Because that would be akin to admitting there is no difference between someone who will slack off at work and someone who will slack off at home. Making them stay in the office changes nothing.

you couldn't get away with taking a nap at work, or even flat out leaving.

Yeah but you can get away with walking in circles around the inside of the building or just going over to your buddy's cubicle and chatting. The specific activity done instead of working is all that changes. The same amount of work is done.

16
tabularasa_556 16 points ago +17 / -1

Do you think work just manifests itself for them to do if they're in the office, but not at home? Do you think if they can afford to slack off at home watching youtube, they couldn't do the exact same thing in their cubicle on their phone? Playing games? Do you have someone whose job it is in the office to helicopter around and crack a whip when they see someone without both their hands on a keyboard?

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you're suggesting simply won't happen. People aren't going to drive to places like Chicago and San Francisco where the bulk of BLM's riots happen to protect the tent cities under bridges. As far as how things would play out if it hypothetically did, say you're right about the barricades. BLM turns around and starts rioting in the opposite direction while the police make sure nobody can follow them. The riot still happens, the politicians still get their excuse.

The bully is not BLM, it is the state. BLM is operating under their orders and with their permission. When you attempt to "stand up" to them, you need to understand what you're actually doing is standing up against the state, who will then use their power against you. If you can understand that then you should also understand "showing up" isn't where it ends. We are not the police and if we attempt to do the job of the police we will be prosecuted. Rittenhouse was able to get out of it for a number of reasons but as I'm sure you're aware one of the important ones was that he had connections to Kenosha despite not actually living there. What are you going to say when the prosecution asks why you were 3 hours away from where you live in a different state protecting the homes and businesses of people you've never met?

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, if regular law abiding citizens tried to defend their cities they would have been called vigilantes and railroaded. Is Grosskreutz in jail right now, despite being on video threatening to shoot someone with a weapon he wasn't legally allowed to have? No. No, he's not, because the people who could have prosecuted wanted him to be there threatening regular law abiding citizens like Rittenhouse.

They would have arrested anyone who tried to do what you're suggesting - using the police who were told to let Antifa and BLM riot - and then used the same excuse. So unless you're advocating for us to have gone out there and shot at BLM and the police (and why stop there, really) then that wouldn't have changed anything. In red areas where we would have been allowed to do that, we didn't have to, because the police did their jobs.

view more: Next ›