2
teleomorph 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. The guy was just in the midst of psychotic episode (perhaps drug-induced), which explains most of the weird aspects of this whole incident.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a rough recollection of stats I've previously seen. Shouldn't be too hard to look up and verify.

As I recall, around 75% of males are net tax contributors and 25% of women are. (Those who are not contributors take more money than they give (via welfare and other programs)).

4
teleomorph 4 points ago +6 / -2

I used to love Owens, until I realized what a conniving psycho-bitch she is.

Watch Nicole Arbour's recent video about her (link below), and also 1st half of her appearance on Timcast and you'll see what a venomous snake she really is.

Broke my heart almost because I used to be such a fan.

Horrendous: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkaVplNlRPQ

0
teleomorph 0 points ago +1 / -1

Watch Nicole Arbour's recent video about her. She is horrendous.

(Sadly. I used to love her.)

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +3 / -1

I used to love and promote the idea of Owens candidacy someday, until I realized what a conniving psycho-bitch she is.

Watch Nicole Arbour's recent video about her, and also 1st half of her appearance on Timcast and you'll see what a venomous snake she really is.

Broke my heart almost because I used to be such a fan.

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +3 / -1

Making enfranchisement based on whether one is a net tax-payer would mean 75% of men could vote (the 25% excluded being net tax-drains and therefore 90% Dem), and only 25% of women could vote (meaning no more single mother welfare queens aka Dem voters).

This would shift the voting outcome just as much if not more-so to the Right than making enfranchisement for males only, and it can be much more easily and logically argued for than disallowing voting based on sex, especially when we have so many successful female business owners and professionals these days who contribute lots of taxes.

9
teleomorph 9 points ago +10 / -1

Less stake in the outcome. (They aren't drafted.)

6
teleomorph 6 points ago +7 / -1

Making enfranchisement based on whether one is a net tax-payer would mean 75% of men could vote (the 25% excluded being net tax-drains and therefore 90% Dem), and only 25% of women could vote (meaning no more single mother welfare queens aka Dem voters).

This would shift the voting outcome just as much if not more-so to the Right than making enfranchisement for males only, and it can be much more easily and logically argued for than disallowing voting based on sex, especially when we have so many successful female business owners and professionals these days who contribute lots of taxes.

11
teleomorph 11 points ago +11 / -0

What role, if any, would you recommend Flynn for in the next Republican administration? National Security Advisor again?

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can mods delete posts like this that are blatantly false information?

3
teleomorph 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump tweeted this video himself before he got kicked off of Twitter.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wat? No. That's Dan Crenshaw. A war-mongering neo-con RINO politician (elected congressman) who wears an eye-patch because he lost an eye in combat in Iraq or some shit.

Ben Shapiro is right-wing media pundit, perhaps the most influential and popular right-wing/conservative media personality after Tucker Carlson. One who is also often criticized as being a neocon and more friendly with establishment Republican views than populist (MAGA) ones.

Are you new to politics? Or under legal voting age?

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trust Sessions. Trust Wray. Trust the Plan. Just 2 more decades.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were many, but making Rinsed Penis his first CoS was his biggest mistake. He's the one who convinced him to fire AF patriots and hire a bunch swamp RINOs.

4
teleomorph 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you click on your profile name you will be taken to all the comments you have made, and be able to see the scores. When all of a sudden, overnight, every single one has downvotes, even all the ones that are not at all controversial, you can tell that someone went to your profile and took the time to go through and downvote every single one. Sometimes they have multiple accounts (or maybe use bots) and every single one of your comments will suddenly have -2 or -3 or more downvotes.

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some of the entities are imagined (like a schizophrenic does), but some are real.

Some of the real ones are various types of spirits (angels or demons in biblical terms, or "Gods" in pantheistic/pagan terms), some are aliens (with telepathic and/or transdimensional capacities), and sometimes one actually does encounter the one true God (sometimes Jeshua too). So just because shamans and early man were able to experience God (or Gods) on mushrooms, doesn't mean God (or angels and demons and aliens) are not actually real.

But yes, psychedelics encountered in the natural environment early on certainly helped lead to development of culture, art, language, technology and religions/spirituality.

It's also possible that hominids born with mutations that allowed them to better tolerate psychedelics had better survival rates (mushrooms can encourage more mating, better hunting skills, and better group cohesion), and therefore played a role in evolution of humans themselves, not just the cultures/religions than came more recently.

3
teleomorph 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's kinda annoying because it affects whether your comments are seen or not. Most people only read the top few comments in a thread, not all. So if your good points are arbitrarily downvoted, less people will see them.

0
teleomorph 0 points ago +6 / -6

His grandchildren are. Why do you hate Trump's grandchildren? They're so cute.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh I didn't know that. Do you know anything about the current LG? Where do they fall on a scale from Dem/RINO to based? Curious.

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even monkeys can recognize patterns. It's deciphering and understanding those patterns that signifies intelligence. Something the Jew-obsessed bigots are incapable of.

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +3 / -2

Freedom of speech is what this forum was made for.

Not exactly. Freedom of pro-Trump/pro-MAGA speech is what this forum was made for, after we were kicked off Reddit for that kind of speech. This is not a public platform/utility but rather a community forum and privately run website with speech rules listed on the sidebar.

If you want a site that is purely made for pure free speech then use Gab.

5
teleomorph 5 points ago +11 / -6

Please stop conflating criticism of Israel or funding for Israel with blatant and infantile anti-Jewish-people sentiment that has sadly become so common here. That's a tactic of both the establishment Left and establishment Right.

4
teleomorph 4 points ago +4 / -0

I like our mods. The /pol/ jannies are censorious cock-gobblers however.

13
teleomorph 13 points ago +14 / -1

Someone actually took the time to downvote every one of my comments going back 7 full pages yesterday. (Probably because I told them slavery was actually a bad thing.) So fucking pathetic, but also kinda annoying (of course this has happened before too, and to many of us.)

I don't know if me knowing exactly who did it would benefit me in any way (I don't want to waste 10 minutes downvoting them in 'retaliation' LOL), but if mods are able to see this behavior on their end, and then give user a warning and then a ban if they repeat the behavior, that would be super cool.

18
teleomorph 18 points ago +19 / -1

YES! Please!!!! I want to be able to see sidebar memes and occasionally have Trump wink at me and still be able to downvote disinfo and other garbage.

view more: Next ›