We owe CBF an apology. She tried to warn us and we called her a liar. He and his gang of activists raped an entire country. I'd be impressed, if I weren't one of the affected parties.

...out of inconceivably many, is that Team Trump (or anyone contesting suspicious results) has this arbitrary time window of about two months to prove that a coordinated effort to steal the election was carried out by people by people who likely have taken great efforts to cover their tracks and have allies in positions of authority. The justice system is a slow-moving beast, and such a case often takes years to build. The system is broken and actively encourages such fraud if the people who commit it have time on their side and merely have to stall until the fraudulent result is enforced. This idea of "so maybe he cheated but we have to respect the results because you couldn't finish a marathon in an hour" is completely antithetical to democracy.

Not my best formulated rant, but I needed to vent. -End transmission-

There is no wrong answer here, as I'm pretty much on the fence about it, but it has occurred to me that this site has been receiving increasing levels of mainstream attention. This presents a unique challenge, because while it is good for us to be able to spread our message to normies, it may entail us self-censoring and making this site more bland and milquetoast overall. On one hand, I wouldn't like this place as much if we can't freely exchange our unapologetically dank memes, but on the other hand, screen grabs of the use of the word "faggot" or jokes about throwing communists out of helicopters could easily go viral. Again, I'm not here to lecture anyone, but I think a discussion is in order.

Trump will likely turn the electoral college back in his favor through litigation and audits, but once he does it's hard to justify spending more time and money trying to win back the popular vote.

That sucks immensely, not only because his numbers put 0bama's 2008 numbers to shame, but also because the version of events that every normie will believe is that the most popular candidate in history was a dimented, racist, warmongering, pedophilic, career politician with zero accomplishments but encyclopediae of corruption to his name. They'll forever believe this candidate who draws ZERO enthusiasm from his own supporters and infuriates a substantial portion of his own party beat a mold-breaking populist who enjoyed the support 95+% of his own party and legions of grassroots Democratic defectors, one who was elected in 2016 on a nationwide gamble against the same elitist, corporatist neoliberal wing of the DNC that Biden represents and has since accrued tons of achievements at home and abroad.

Then there's another four years of non-stop whinging about "electoral college bad!" and "drumpf cheated! [by investigating our cheating]"

Trump smashed it and the world may never know the full extent. It's like he time-travelled to save the world in the past but now he has to live in the timeline where no one knows what he did. It's reminds me of the ending of Ocarina of Time: sad and frustrating. Rant over. Need sleep.

Granted, it was a while ago, but GamerGate was a pivotal moment in the culture war, and arguably the precursor to Trump's 2016 upset victory. Essentially, GG was a consumer revolt by gamers against the corrupt, nepotistic gaming "journalism" industry and the incursion of intersectional politics into their hobby. Rather than report the issue fairly, the MSM (notably Soyboy-in-Chief Stephen Colbert) took the opportunity to bludgeon the (sic) "fragile white male gamers" with feminist identity politics and accuse anyone sympathetic to their grievances of the tired "muh soggy knees" canard. It red-pilled masses of apolitical gamers of all ages, races, backgrounds and sexes. It was the first time that these detached dopamine-seekers were intimately aware of the details of a controversy and got to see first-hand the deliberate misrepresentation and agenda-pushing of the legacy media in a coordinated full-frontal assault. No one who was paying attention and honest about the issue could pretend that there wasn't something deeply worrying about the current state of corporate media. While it's difficult to prove, it can inferred that our current president would be the Butcher of Benghazi if not for the misplaced hubris of Left-Coast media elites.

Question: what do high-profile cases like Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd have in common?

Among others, these are the BLM movements' most high-profile causes. They were blasted across the global media for weeks and months and shamelessly presented with myriad omissions and twisted facts. Unfailingly, the narrative in each case is that an unarmed black person, who through absolutely no fault of their own, was assassinated by sadistic racists. The cops (or security guard) in each case were then overcharged, seemingly on the strength of public opinion, only to be acquitted when facts that were public record from the very beginning were presented in court.

On the surface, this may seem like a simple matter of rushing to judgment, but there are clues that BLM and their media accomplices are acting in bad faith rather than merely out of incompetence. Mainly, there are a documented cases of bad shootings that are factually consistent with the narrative BLM is trying to push. So the question is, why did't those cases receive any attention? The most likely answer is that putting forth their best argument was never the point.

First, a solid case for BLM wouldn't be politically polarizing in the way that their narrative-pushing is, since the vast majority of right-wing people would agree that the shooting was bad and the victim deserves justice. Instead, BLM supporters get to distinguish themselves as the champions of justice, while telling black people "those evil conservatives want you to die!" as evidenced by conservatives disagreeing with their version of events.

Second, and really the main reason, is the century-old Marxist tactic of dividing the country along racial lines. Essentially, they're trying to radicalize black people and keep them trapped in a cycle of confirmation bias:

1. "Cops are racist murderers."
2. Unarmed black person gets killed by the cops.
3. Don't wait for facts to come in before reinforcing #1.
4. Cops(s) get charged, usually overcharged by activist DA or cowardly DA trying to appease the mob.
5. Cop(s) get acquitted or convicted of significantly lesser crime.
6. "Cops are racist murderers, and the System protects them."
7. "There is no political solution."

No one likes ads, but hear me out. If the mods sold some ad space and then donated the proceeds to Trump's campaign, Judicial Watch, pro-life groups, etc. and accompanied each ad with "All ad revenue goes towards..." that would take care of the shill problem real quick.

Any legal pedes know if doing so would allow TD to operate as a non-profit, or is it not worth the IRS hassle?

It's not like it isn't public knowledge at this point.

https://wikileaks.org/wiki/FBI_pedophile_symbols

I don't understand the benefit of potentially outing yourself. Even if it's to network with other pedophiles, they're opening themselves to being infiltrated by undercover law enforcement (although I don't doubt that LE is often complicit). Is it just to rub it in our faces, because they know they're untouchable? I don't see other criminals alluding to their nefarious deeds in their Twitter bios.