1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. I agree with that. His evidence will be outstanding but they won’t do shit.

2
tellittothedead1 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s done a lot more due diligence than people realize. He’s putting 5 million bucks up and he’s invited everyone who’s qualified to examine the evidence.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

So did others. They were wrong. Doesn’t mean this will be wrong.

by jda70
1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +2 / -1

CODEMONKEY is a larper for sure but judge based on evidence. More stuff came out in addition to video

by jda70
1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

We shall see. He put his money where his mouth is.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Umm the Australians not us. Regardless of whether anyone does anything, the government knows it always has the potential to be on shaky ground. Look up the gun grab in cuckstralia

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone who give up the right to protect themselves has already lost In my opinion

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the outcome would have been much different if they didn’t allow themselves to be disarmed.

5
tellittothedead1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't worry, just like DACA Democrats just make up the rules as they go.

1
tellittothedead1 1 point ago +1 / -0

This problem is multi-factorial. Not one thing only

11
tellittothedead1 11 points ago +11 / -0

Bunch of lefty faggots. It used to mean something now they are the mainstream

2
tellittothedead1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, it's reacted very quickly because of the chemistry of RNA, so it is degraded quickly. I think 'spoilage' is the wrong word, unless it implying the vaccine has been mishandled according to the manufacturers guidelines. mRNA degrades quickly to other stable compounds.

view more: Next ›