That's part of the brainwashing. There are more of us than it seems in the media. A LOT more.
And if you're letting something like a soft-drink company get you down, then the brainwashing is working. Step back and take a new look.
I didn't look at every single product on the list, but I did a quick scan and I venture that there is nothing on that list that I need. In fact, I'm better off not using any of it. This is good news.
"Fiberglass is not tobacco."
What is that in reference to?
I'll bet more of the people in this thread think that exact thing of you than me.
"How you see the outside is to some extent a reflection of how you see yourself."
What do you think, if we were to take a poll, would they think you have said much? Have you, in this whole thread, said anything of substance? More of your comments have been deleted btw, so at this rate we may never know.
And plasticizers in the bottles themselves leach into the drink and act as endocrine disruptors. Often mimicking estrogen. Most well known is BPA.
Xenoestrogens. Learn about them. Might explain where all this gender bender stuff is coming from.
You think this qualifies as political discourse? It doesn't. You've already said that "People do not respond to reasoned discourse." You have avoided all discussion about the topic that you brought up.
No one is shitting this thread up more than you. Does that make you a woman? Well either I am or I'm not. But you're just taking us in circles now. And proving my point with nearly every reply.
It's interesting how your brain will do anything but talk about the very thing that you brought up or anything pertaining to that. Always straight to namecalling of some sort.
And maybe mommy issues. It would explain a lot.
It's the internet - we're all abrasive assholes. But some of us have something to support the ideas we put forth and some of us just call everyone names. So, you've established that you think women should not take part in what you call "political discourse". Of the set of people who should avoid what you think is "political discourse", do you think boys with mommy issues should be included?
Well not exactly, but close. And I also said that you didn't make any good points (they were either exaggerated, incorrect, or unconvincing).
I have to give you credit for one thing tho, "People do not respond to reasoned discourse." On this, I see your point. You have clearly proven that some people don't.
Well it's either that, or you're not bright enough to see my point. And as the insults are your basic message and you don't have much beyond that, I'm leaning towards the latter.
Either way, don't think too much about it. Your perspectives are clearly either too shallow or too fragile to discuss.
It's deleted.
You make some points here that might be worth discussing, but you're just such an insufferable cunt. (See what I did there? See how it you just forgot the first part of the sentence? That's what you did all over this thread.)
"People do not respond to reasoned discourse. They need to be ridiculed." No, you're wrong. And as I try to frame an argument to convince you, I realize you won't listen so maybe you're right - fuck it. How you see the outside is to some extent a reflection of how you see yourself. It's true that many people (maybe you) don't respond to reasoned discourse, but some people do. Sometimes. But they won't ever if you are rude. Well, maybe you can be rude, but direct insults just puts a wall up. If you want to change people's minds you have to persuade them or at least make them curious. You are really bad at that. Here in this thread anyways. Phenomenally bad.
Even your points aren't that good - "puppet state" is a bit of an overstatement (at least right now), the US is still the most powerful empire (at least measured militarily), it has projected power in last decades, the US is being sucked dry most directly by a parasitic class (not the world at large)... And tho it would be good to discuss Chinese influence, and the loss of US influence and power, and how we are being sucked dry, there's no point trying to discuss any of of it with you because "any person who believes" that" is an irredeemable moron who will never understand blah blah blah - bored now.
And you've mentioned some authors (or something I dunno) who might be really smart and interesting and I might have done a websearch for if I was curious, but you made me uncurious.
No persuasion. No discussion. So no further thought on my end. And that's all on you and your insults. And maybe the worst part is, they aren't even good insults. You make fascism look bad.
But why? If the mods deleted it once, they'll likely delete it again. Besides, any point that you're trying to make is overshadowed by the insult. Almost no one will hear anything but the insult.
You made a post to make a point. It was kind of low energy meh, but whatever. You got a little bit of pushback and you crapped all over your own thread with insults. That's not a good way to win people over to your thinking.
It's not very often these days that anyone gets a chance to say this, but you make fascism look bad.
And THAT is how you do a burn. Well done. You can see by their reply that you got under their skin. - spez: so much so that it got deleted. Ha!
And not to crap on your post, but I can't find anywhere else to put this.
https://i.maga.host/SI42H1w.png
What's hanging on the wall on either side of the flag?
I don't mention this to make a point. I have no point. I just find it interesting that people decided to put that on the wall of Congress. I have no clue why but always wondered.
Send a message for a month,
and then keep going because that company will still suck, and their stuff is garbage, and it's bad for you.
Coke doesn't like you. Stop giving them your money.
Stop drinking soda. It's not good for you.
And likely after she whined about being overweight.
Needs more bald. But yeah, I see it.
Akchually.... That does look like a toupee... So yeah it works.
"Who would do such a thing?"
In the early days I give people a pass because it's a new thing and there will be fuckups. But as time goes by you expect people to correct the fuckups. So if the fuckups continue, people in charge are either stupid/incompetent or malicious. Based on the timeline I'm leaning towards malicious.
"How can they get away with it?"
Because the media protects them. It has to be highly organized with widespread (monopoly) control. From March to very late April 2020, almost no one in the media asked anything about putting infected people into nursing homes. With signs on overpasses and nursing home workers screaming about it, he was finally asked about the policy in late April, and he said about nursing homes "They don't have the right to object!" That video went viral and finally shamed him into acting, so changed the policy on May 10th. But still the media was campaigning for him, telling us how smart and great he was.
There are many nursing homes. Cuomo could have put infected patient into separate nursing homes but he didn't, he kept them mixed. Trump gave Cuomo a giant hospital ship, it went largely unused. Trump gave Cuomo a field hospital on Central Park, largely unused. Trump gave Cuomo a giant field hospital at the Javits Center, largely unused. Trump gave Cuomo a giant $23million hospital in Brooklyn, completely unused - not one single patient. All while stuffing infected elderly people into nursing homes. This went on for quite some time, and the media was silent.
In January we knew that there was a highly infectious respiratory virus that targeted old people coming out of China. Trump understood the risks and acted to close some travel in late January. The Left called him racist and told people to go out all thru February. By early March some hospitals in Italy were beyond capacity, so by then it was clear to everyone that there was some risk of a catastrophe. On March 25th Cuomo implemented a policy that forced nursing homes to accept patients infected with a highly infectious respiratory virus that targets old people. At this point, there is a huge opportunity for an honest journalist to ask pertinent questions. There are thousands of (so-called) journalists. No one asked the right questions. For weeks. They did the opposite, they protected Cuomo. All of them. All thru late March, into April, thru all of April. The policy wasn't changed until May 10th. Look at the chart at the bottom of this page for when people died in New York:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/usa/new-york/
Look at that spike in April.
Someone or something must have total or near-total control over the media. Where are the real journalists? The media bent over backwards to blame Trump for the deaths and hold Cuomo up as the model of what to do. They are working together, treating people worse than livestock. They are working together. Nationwide. Worldwide. The story was only allowed to break mainstream after Trump was out. There must be total control of the media. No other explanation.
They mean anyone on the right not in the Uniparty. Anyone not part of the corruption.
Populist movements threaten to unseat the corruption in many countries across the world. I think there's A LOT more of us than we're led to believe.
Strawman - an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the proper idea of argument under discussion was not addressed or properly refuted.
An informal fallacy is all you've got. After all this, your only point is that he might be lying.
Are people linking to his youtube channel?
Dipshit.
After all that's been said, this is all you have. This one little fake argument. You stick to this and only this because everything else is embarrassing. Example: You've been all over this thread crying about "people linking to his youtube channel" all while calling everyone else stupid and moron and everything else, when they actually linked to a completely different person's channel. Absolute dipshit. And after being shown how stupid you are, here you are calling me moron and other names. Total hypocrite. That is just embarrassing. And that's just one example. So you ignore everything else and stick to this. This one little fake argument that you expand into a ridiculous strawman.
My point, dipshit, is that you don't know that he's a lying sociopath. You don't know either. You don't know that he's a liar. You don't know that he's a sociopath. You assume that he is, but you don't know. And all the arguments that you've made about it have fallen flat. You probably don't even know the definition of sociopath. Quick, go look it up on wikipedia.
I get that he could be lying, everyone sees that. He could also be a sociopath. But you have no idea. You don't even know who he is. You can't even tell him apart from the youtuber. My point is that you don't know. You think you do because you've convinced yourself that you have a bigbrain, but it's all your imagination.
Yes, he killed someone so he could also be a liar, but you don't know. You have no idea. You've speculated a reason about why he might have done it. But you didn't base that on any evidence. And you've speculated another reason about why he might have done it that is different from the first speculation, but also no evidence. And you've speculated that there may be some other reason, but you don't know what that might be, and of course, no evidence. Now, Watson may be lying, he may be full of shit but we'll never know. What we do know is that you are full of shit.
Do you still think people are linking to his youtube channel? You do, don't you? Dipshit.
Here's another perfect example. You say that there "are people literally linking to his YouTube channel". They are not. They are linking to the youtube channel of Mitch Smiley, a completely different person. You are, again, wrong and stupid.
And when shown that you are wrong and stupid, you deflect. Your brain can't handle the truth. Cognitive dissonance.
It's a different person, dipshit.
Everything you said was proved wrong and/or stupid. You pulled every single thing out of your ass. You can't see that because you have cognitive dissonance. You say he's a lying sociopath, but you don't actually know that. You don't actually know anything about him, you just made it all up.
You can't even tell the difference between him and Mitch Smiley. Dipshit.
You find my comments tedious because your brain simply cannot deal with it. You have cognitive dissonance. Your brain is protecting you from the truth. It must be exhausting.
Oh, right there. See? Deflection. Your brain just cannot focus on any one thing, because every time it does you get proven wrong or stupid. Your brain just flips off into random imaginings about what the murderer might be thinking or what I might be thinking. Because cognitive dissonance. You can't even tell the difference between Jonathan Watson and Mitch Smiley but you know what the guy is thinking? Dipshit. Does it comfort you to think that I watch FOX or support GOPe? You're comforting yourself because you're weak. Because your brain is weak.
You can't address any of my points about your imaginings, you can't back up anything you've said with anything resembling reality, you can't tell us why we lose because sociopaths but you lose because truth (LOL). Your brain won't let you. Cognitive Dissonance.
No fair. Your comments came after.
Anyway are you getting the tattoo? Because if you don't have a Jonathan Watson tattoo, you're not glorifying him enough.
That's a totally different person, dipshit.
The guy in the top post that killed the child molesters is Jonathan Watson. The youtuber is Mitch Smiley. One is in prison, the other served his time and is out. Watson is late 30s maybe 40 in the pic, Smiley is 56. Watson has brown hair, Smiley has white hair. They don't look the same. They're obviously different people.
But not to you. They're all the same to you. All motivated by whatever you imagine. Dipshit.
This is Mitch acting as the employee that he is, simply saying that he intends to vote to confirm another employee.
Uniparty employees don't work for us.