Couldn't have said it better myself.
I like your style in this message, so I wanna see what you think about this:
I'm on the fence between a Trump-Republican stance on immigration and a hard moratorium. I hear you that immigrants, in many instances, provide value to the society they enter in a way they were unable to in their former, more corrupt country.
If you view "skilled labor force" as something to always be increased, then merit-based immigration policy makes sense. But all things in the economy require an equilibrium. Right now, skilled labor wages are going down. Increasing that supply of workers through immigration would worsen this issue. Why not protect the wages of today's Americans rather than provide a decaying wage to new Americans?
This was one of my arguments for the lie, but I worry about balancing this with the risk of demoralizing Trump voters who would only vote if they believe they have a good chance. Irrational voting strategy, but those people do exist. . . I guess there's no good answer in a broken poll to begin with.
I agree with this sentiment, but knowing that there are people in the general population who don't agree with that and are influenced by polls, I wanted to know what people thought would be a good strategy. 50% of people are dumber than the average person, so we have to cut into that vote share.
All this, and I still have to listen to anti-nationalist and anti-white rhetoric from the principal at my sister's high school GRADUATION CEREMONY. Get back to doing your job, you filthy slob. Imagine turning a graduation into a political rally.
The problem with his statement is not that it was false, but that it's Democrat racism that has caused the ideological uniformity he mentioned. The fact that blacks are (were? Source: Rasmussen) a relative monolith is well-established, but it gives up the Democratic game.
LMAO I misread the tense of your first sentence and nearly leapt over to Twitter to see the tweet where Ted Cruz calls a ChiCom shill a faggot.
I would suggest that we call someone in from Twitter to sit before Congress, but first we need to explain the Internet to like 70% of Congressional Republicans. Good for Missouri for taking the chance on the young guy.
Need more Senators like Hawley. . . Even knowing very little about his record, it's nice having someone in Congress who knows what The YouTube is and how to get the Book of Faces. . . Fucking geezers
I cringed when she said those words in that order. Knew immediately what the articles were gonna say. She clarified only 2 sentences later. . . She's gotta be more precise than that.
Exactly. I think people in those areas see the destruction, and they see the federal government. But they don't see how much their local choices affect their outcomes. Pushing federalist strategy is only effective so long as the people draw the connection between their safety and their local policies.
Thanks for giving your thoughts. I hear your argument, and I think that you are correct when it comes to people willing to hear him. But the Oval Office Address and the prepared nature of those speeches carry a certain gravity that would force opposing news media to show their audiences the full address, live.
I could be wrong that more people would listen in my proposed case. But I think a sharp address to the nation would be an utter red-pill dispensary.
Thank you, pede! Glad I could deliver memes for the war effort!
Thank you, pede! First sticky, hopefully more to come!
How submissive can a man get?
Huh. Wonder if we would hear so much about "Texas becoming competitive" if not for this kind of crap.
I joined a general meme chat at my university about 2 years ago. Your usual normie trash, but what more do you expect from college? It's been interesting over the last couple years to see the mindless memes they used to distract themselves from their mild TDS. Over the years, the left-shift of the chat was gradual, but undeniable.
However, recently, a long-time poster on this chat began showing symptoms of more severe TDS, and it was spreading to other members. The first shot of this meme battle was fired in the first image above, where she explicitly stated "not a meme" and posted a tweet by a Democratic activist. My fren then fired back with quality .win content (you-ain't-black-coffin-dance.mp4).
In the final image, I rally the troops in our College Republicans group chat. Wish us luck in our campaign. May post updates if TDS symptoms worsen.
She's got the ugly real bad.
I'm really glad OP included Drudge on this graphic. I also had NO clue that crap was so popular.
People fight for 15 because being 14 or younger is dangerous with Biden around.
The other day, I sat in wonder as an immigrant (who came here, he said, for the freedoms he would enjoy) make the argument to me against personal liberty in favor of "collective rights" with no trace of irony.
We need a serious change in our immigration and education systems.
Wuhan begins the middle of their end when President Xi Jinping began by saying their end had come to an end and welcoming a new beginning. But really, the end of the beginning of their end is upon them, showing America that while we are nearing the end of the lockdown, we are really at the end of the beginning, entering the middle, and the end is nigh.
-CNN. . .probably
Each day, President Trump gets a few paragraphs to counter hours of smokescreen coverage, and he still keeps winning.
Less and less people are caring what they say each day. We just gotta keep laughing at those who still do.
96% confidence 3% disgust 1% pity
You seem to know your stuff. Curious about your thoughts on Guilded as a Discord alternative. I've been using it, but I'd like to know if there's a good reason I shouldn't continue to do so.