Never knew straight women found nipples attractive.
1.) They experience body dysphoria, similar to someone who want's to amputate an arm. It's a matter of feeling uncomfortable with their genitals.
2.) It's simply easier to perform a mastectomy without preserving the nipples.
The surgeons who specialize 'gender reassignments' usually aren't very good at what they do. Surgeons are fully aware of the permanent harm they are causing, so gender reassignment attracts less scrupulous doctors. Even just comparing the surgical technique between gender surgeries and most other surgeries, they are just sloppy.
In the NHS, surgical oncologists are REQUIRED to perform mastectomies while breast cancer patients have their surgeries delayed, so they use the most time efficient technique so their cancer patients don't die on a wait-list, hence the nipple goes.
The mastectomy procedure was initially developed to treat cancer (in which case all breast tissue must go), they just repurposed the same procedure.
If the nipples were left, they would be much larger and more sensitive than a mans; though for the most part it's just a matter of expedience.
It's sort of like how in mtf procedures, all but the head of the penis is removed; however, erectile tissue within the clitoris plays a huge role in female sexual function, so they lack both male and female parts.
edit: it is possible perform a nipple sparing mastectomy, as well as reducing the size of the areola (tinted skin around the nipple) but the nipples will still be much larger and more sensitive, unless if feeling is lost in the nipples from nerve damage.
Please list them here so more people can see.
Perhaps that is why people were dropping dead...
Maybe those videos were propaganda to get Western countries to lockdown once it was already too late.
They broke the law by ising office in the military to engage in politics.
They actually did report a nothingburger conclusion to the Las Vegas investigation.
I'm sorry, I think I initially misunderstood your comment. I thought you were implying that it wasn't possible to destroy Germany's identity twice.
Too bad it's only propaganda and that Germany never truly was denazified.
Not sure about the validity of this.
Just want to point out that the nazis were horrible and evil etc. And destroying them was entirely sensible. I think that the 'mixed allegiances' here you speak of are simply trolls.
Why do you agree with the message of eliminating Germany's culture from before the World Wars, which has nothing to do with nazism?
Germany was humiliated after WWI and their economy was destroyed; however, to say that Germany lost it's history, traditions, etc. is wrong.
Take a look at Marshall era propaganda regarding ridding German's of their 'history and traditions." (Fredrick, Bismark, and the Kaiser) "until he does he is still a potential enemy of civilization."
https://mega.nz/file/lMxlUCab#KG2fkJI1DNjBj3pH-Vt7EYsZCvvgGf1AHDTFSKzlXII
They wen't beyond simply denazifying Germany. They wanted to ensure that the rivalry that existed for 200 years prior to WW1 never resurfaced again.
It's more about how they destroyed West Germany's national identity so that they would become the vanguard of socialism in Europe after the fall of the USSR.
But it also sowed the seeds for Western Europe to fall into 'democratic' Socialism.
Monero (xmr)
Bitcoin has no privacy at all. Monero (XMR) is where it's at.
MIT licence go brrrrr
He isn't a god.
You need to get out of the closet
This actually benefits tall people by preventing back problems and poses a risk of serious injury to short people due to the fall risk.
It was confirmed by a Berkley Professor. Atrazine.
Removing 60% of biden's votes wouldn't have changed the 2020 vote totals....
If only the humanities departments actually taught humanities.
Veritas' video confirmed it is Benny Thomas