1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: 10

n+7

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: 9

n+6

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: 8

n+5

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

**aynrandysavage: 7

n+4

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

As you could see, even if I don't get back with you during the day, that night, the next day, the next week, the next month, the next year, the next decade, etc., I WILL get rebut you. Our back and forth continues until you wisely stay down.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

**aynrandysavage: 4

n+3

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: u/thebesig stay down

u/aynrandysavage You haven't even knocked me down. Not once. How about begging me to stop hammering you? That would match what's happening here. I don't back down.

The only way you could expect me to not respond to you is if you ignored me. It's that simple. This isn't rocket science.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

January 30, 2021: Since "comments can't go that deep", I have to respond to my previous post:

aynrandysavage: 3

n+2:

2
thebesig 2 points ago +2 / -0

I downloaded the paper that Anthony Fauci co authored regarding the 2018/19 Pandemic. I didn't see mention of a mask as the cause... But based on what they wrote (fall 2008), as a problem that lead to many deaths, they shouldn't even be recommending any face coverings. We're making the same mistakes in the 2020/2021 pandemic that they made just over a century ago.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: 2 I'll count your replies as well: n = your previous replies. Starting with your recent reply... 1, we have: n + 1.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: Well, given that you sound like somebody who's not that young,

That's relative. I'm 50. Judging by your behavior, I 'd put you in your teens, or early 20s. You may not see me as someone who is "not that young", someone older would see me as "young".

aynrandysavage: in poor health,

I go on distance runs six out of seven mornings, early in the morning when the stars are up. During the summer, that's followed up by yard maintenance that involves bending down from a standing position to pull weeds up. I rapidly go up the three floors of my home without being out of breath.

You're wrong in this area, just as you are wrong with everything else here and elsewhere.

aynrandysavage: and without much of a life beyond posting here, [SELF PROJECTION]

First, it doesn't take me long to generate my responses to you.

Second, I'm balancing this with other activities in my life. See physical activity above. I'm also working on doctoral courses (hammering you is one of my break activities).

Third, I'm a retired Soldier, with a quarter of a century, cumulative, of military service under my belt.

Fourth, there are other activities that I do throughout my day. Once again, you get it wrong about me.

aynrandysavage: I expected you wouldn't have anything better to do.

You're wrong. Again, it doesn't take me long to generate my rebuttals to you.

aynrandysavage: I also expect that the rage you feel from not getting the last word will make your bacon grease coated arteries pop and give you an aneurysm at some point in the near future. [SELF PROJECTION]

First, nope, no rage at all. Again, I've been debating with people online for over 17 years. One of the major reasons to why I do this is that it is fun. I take sadistic pleasure in denying people, like you, the last word, while destroying your arguments.

Let's be honest here, you're the one that has issues with not getting the last word. If it wasn't about getting the last word, you wouldn't have continued replying to me. But, you can't help it. You have anger, control, and excessive ego issues. These three, in combination, drive you to keep arguing in a thread where you're getting destroyed in.

Far fetched? A simple "Ok" response was an attempt, on your part, to have the last word. In fact, your first response to me was designed, you thought, to put me in a situation where I couldn't respond to you. That's an indication of control on your part.

However, when I rebutted you and explained my real intention, based on what I sated in my original post, you didn't take that too well. To regain control, you took me out of context, my response made you look stupid.

Second, I have you, just as I've had others before you, in an apparent psychological profile. Every word, sentence, and paragraph that I use, everything that I do in response to you, is designed to get you to react a certain way.

You've reacted exactly as I expected you to react. It's like I control your reactions on this thread, psychologically.

Your demeanor and attitude on this thread indicates that you have problems with interacting with other people... To the point that you have a harder time than your co-workers with asking for pay raises, promotions, lateral job transfers, etc. Additionally, there's a good chance that you believe that those that work with you, and those that you work for, "have it in for you". There's also a good chance that at best, you have problems remaining in a relationship, or even having problems getting into a relationship. I wouldn't be surprised if you identify as an involuntary celibate.

I knew, when I responded to your "Ok" response, saying what I said, that you'd shift gears and angrily type more in your response. That's precisely what you did.

The reality is that you're pissed at me for not letting you have the last word... For not allowing you to regain control... That's what the real issue is.

Third, nope, no "bacon greased arteries" here. See above physical activity. At my age, you have to eat right and get enough sleep to engage in the kind of physical activities that I get into.

Why would I have the reaction you claimed I had when I take sadistic pleasure subjecting people like you to my type of rebuttals, just to get the reaction that I expect from you guys?

aynrandysavage: Let's see how many posts it takes. Here we go! 1

One million? Billion? Trillion? Count away, I will keep hammering you knowing full well that it angers you when you're put in a situation that you can't control. I wouldn't be surprised if you're frustrated over the fact that you just can't set yourself up for a fight, then hit "save" like what you could do on your video games.

6
thebesig 6 points ago +6 / -0

A Duck Duck Go search for his information shows that he was born on April Fools' Day.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: Ok

Glad you acknowledged the reality of a response to you.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

The majority of the military is conservative, and are Trump supporters. If the standards they ultimately come up with gets rid of people who support Trump, we will no longer have the strongest military in the world.

The nature of military service creates a philosophy that makes the majority of us go conservative. The combat/operational environment requires conservative thinking... Like basing your decision on fact, reason, and logic as well as promoting people, or assigning them, based on merit.

What Obama did, and what Biden is continuing, will simply destroy the human willingness to prevail in the battlefield. Additionally, it builds a military that's chock full of corruption.

His policies, Biden's, and the "Woke Brigade" wanting to push changes on the military is going tank retention, encourage people to retire if eligible, drive up disciplinary problems, etc. It's going to be a mess.

I'm glad that I'm retired.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: You don't have to do anything.

And neither do you. You have no control over what I do, but you have control over what you do. I have every intention of rebutting you.

aynrandysavage: but if the voices in your head tell you it's important to ramble at people who aren't listening to you, it's way easier to just wander out on the street and scream at people [SELF PROJECTION]

You, having control, anger, and ego issues, are having problems with the fact that I keep responding to you. Your assumptions about what's going on with me are incorrect. Let me simplify this for you.

Let "X" by your rebuttal to me.

Let "Y" be my counter rebuttal to you.

So far, our argument can be summed as follows: If X, then Y, ad infinitum.

You want me to stop, but you "advance X", which results in my advancing Y. You, complaining about my "continuing to ramble", are like that person that demands that the "red" stove burner quits burning you every time you touch it.

Want this to stop? Then YOU don't do anything. Move on and stop bitching, whining, moaning, and groaning about my responding to you.

Until then, expect me to rebut you every time you respond to me.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage: What happened to your rambling walls of text?

The length of my posts depends on how much of your BS I have to debunk. The more BS you post, the more I have to debunk, the longer my resulting post.

2
thebesig 2 points ago +2 / -0

And I was supporting your statement by bringing knowledge to bear from reading the entire Bible more than once, from the beginning of Genesis to the end of Revelation. :D

2
thebesig 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just someone trying to get attention.

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mentioned God to let folk know that I don't need others to cheer me up or to motivate me. :D Just trust in God's intent.

Yup, some of his teaching methods are severe, but people are stubborn. There is a purpose behind God's methods too. In the Old Testament, one way God's methods are described is as a furnace fire, and those being punished as silver/valuable metal being melted to have the impurities removed in order to have a better product in the end. It's a purification process. :D

1
thebesig 1 point ago +1 / -0

aynrandysavage (proving himself wrong about how much he reads): doubtful

Not doubtful but factual based on historic trend.

11
thebesig 11 points ago +11 / -0

"They scared the shit out of him and the district manager."

That group came with a Karen! :o

2
thebesig 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're "not" military? Angry Cop disagrees.

2
thebesig 2 points ago +2 / -0

They'll be eating their own. Without the conservative base to pose a threat against their agenda, the left wouldn't have a major excuse to close ranks the way they are now. They'd find the next group to treat the way this site and others are being treated. There are a lot of useful idiots on the other side who are going to be in for a rude awakening.

view more: Next ›