4
thegeebeebee 4 points ago +4 / -0

I really think the degree of lead poisoning matters.

Also, what are you citing about Mexico fixing their lead poisoning problem?

Pretty sure it's easier to buy leaded gas down there, they still have a ton of cookware & dishes with lead glazing, lead glazing shops go unregulated and the data I've seen shows 50% poisoning rates for Mexicans.

But Mexicans in Mexico don't have Democrats fucking with them.

All refugees are tested for lead poisoning. Not all Americans are.

I'd love to review your sources so I can be more informed. But I think you're actually speaking more to lead poisoning impact variances more than country variances.

1
thegeebeebee 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm not defending that bullshit.

I'm saying that if you can still accept deriving pleasure from institutions you've trusted in the past, without funding then after they've been guttted by commies, then DON'T LET THEM CHANGE YOUR MINDSET AND FEELINGS

it's not about the institution. It's about you. They want you demoralized. Money is fucking fake. Fuck the money. It's about you.

You're the target. Trump says it and I back him up.

5
thegeebeebee 5 points ago +6 / -1

Some of us have pregnant family and we don't want our unborn children to be denied oxygen because the mothers' placentas have been ravaged.

8
thegeebeebee 8 points ago +8 / -0

Huh?

They are pervasive.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2018/04/30/that-time-the-cdc-asked-about-defensive-gun-uses/#1d4b7f06299a

The violent crime rate would be off the fucking charts if Americans weren't armed and willing to use guns to prevent crimes. More violent crime is prevented than occurs and we still have high violent crime rates.

Obama commissioned this study by the CDC and they show the data.

https://www.nap.edu/read/18319/chapter/3

The statement you have issue with is not wrong.

10
thegeebeebee 10 points ago +12 / -2

this is why I fucking hate racism - racists focus on the people rather than the causes.

I'll never defend the people who cause violence. They own that. But having brain deformation or psychological\physiological propensities that can be impacted means we need to address what we can address before we lay full blame. Additionally, not everyone will carry the genes. Not everyone with the genes will express the behavior. Determinism is bullshit and there are no living Calvinists left.

I can show you so much data on lead poisoning in this country and around the globe. I really think it impacts these genes (epigenetics).

Also brain injuries matter. So let's say 5% have the gene, but then violence is also promoted within and without the culture those people live in. That means TBI becomes more prevalent as kids, teens and adults beat the shit out of each other.

Chicago mandated lead fucking pipes in every home and won't help the poor (tend to be minorities) pay to replace them. NYC covered up lead in public housing. Fuck Rahm. Fuck Wilhelm. Fuck the DNC for covering this up and blaming republicans for Flint.

Multiple causes. But with genetic testing, we can remove any dominance of the gene from passing on as people learn that they can adopt or use surrogacy to prevent the passing of these deadly genes. Just like how other people do for stuff. It's normal now.

But yeah you're a racist if you know any of this. You're a racist if you want to improve things because actual Nazis existed and so we're all evil right?

9
thegeebeebee 9 points ago +9 / -0

Read this https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058761/

Your answer is mapped from incarceration rates for violent crime convictions. But you have to control for lead poisoning and TBI rates. Those increase violence, too.

19
thegeebeebee 19 points ago +19 / -0

I've got more context from other studies. But that sums it up.

2
thegeebeebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

From each according to their ability to fuck, to each their need to get fucked.

Wait what

5
thegeebeebee 5 points ago +6 / -1

I just don't like victim mentalities, myself. It wasn't you being a dick. I just don't like trying to say "men have it harder than women" when communists are trying to shit on and destroy everything we love.

6
thegeebeebee 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mexico is very racist, though. Only Spanish bloodlines can run politics and the media. Minorities are treated worse than dogs down there.

13
thegeebeebee 13 points ago +13 / -0

Um how about men!?

How about body images. First to make thick women hate themselves, promoting eating disorders and self harm. Then to do the opposite and make skinny women hate themselves for not being obese.

Women's sports now have men dominating them.

The top Olympic athlete of all time is a woman and we've never heard about her. Why? She wins golds with guns.

Motherhood

Should I keep going?

2
thegeebeebee 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understood this a comment or two ago when you explained more of your thinking. And it makes sense, I get where you're coming from.

The problem you and I had was that you were sounding exactly like what I've seen communists say about self defense - that it is tantamount to capital punishment. Stemmed from the trayvon Martin attack on Zimmerman.

So I thank you for sticking with this. I'm sorry if I got under your skin, but I wasn't trying to.

3
thegeebeebee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have you seen a single ad? I'm not using ad blocker on purpose here and still don't understand.

7
thegeebeebee 7 points ago +7 / -0

They want us to hate what we used to love.

1
thegeebeebee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then what are you confused about?

In Texas, it's different. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm

Read the section on defense of property. Maybe the person you have a problem with is from Texas. Then you can't correct them about "should"

79
thegeebeebee 79 points ago +81 / -2

You've perfectly summed up communism.

18
thegeebeebee 18 points ago +18 / -0

The destruction of capitalism requires the full demoralization of the people. Everything we hold dear will be attempted to be destroyed.

1
thegeebeebee 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why I told you to go read more laws.

Threats of grievous bodily harm can be met with lawful lethal force.

That isn't capital punishment. There is no "should" when it comes to that split second of needing to react to a deadly threat. You're overlaying hypotheticals that are irrelevant. Reading the laws clears this up and defines who is legally able to do what actions when threats of grievous bodily harm are presented.

Take a CCW course. This stuff is extremely clear when you read the laws.

"They should be shot" was someone else's comment. You're having that conversation with me and I ask you to understand what we're saying vs what you're saying to others.

3
thegeebeebee 3 points ago +4 / -1

You're changing the subject.

Self defense isn't capital punishment. Who told you they were the same? They lied to you.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›