2
thxpk 2 points ago +2 / -0

He made the mistake of thinking there were good people still in the system, that the system was sound but needed to be repaired.

That was a mistake, the system is broken, they're are no good people in it, it needed to be purged completely.

7
thxpk 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why the fuck do these companies feel the need to bring politics into everything, you're a fucking email provider, that's all.

4
thxpk 4 points ago +4 / -0

The difference between a photoshopped parody is a day or two, about the time it takes to become real

4
thxpk 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is that restaurant in Canada I think, not pro maskers but nazi health enforcers

2
thxpk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sorry enough to not take the 4 million dollars.

2
thxpk 2 points ago +2 / -0

get covid at all in high enough viral loads that I can pass it to my kids.

Your kids are not at risk even if you do pass it to them which is unlikely

What are the long term effects of having covid? Nobody knows!

There are none, no more than influenza. Already proven recently majority are psychosomatic.

They are a decades in development concept

Yet somehow never been approved...

34
thxpk 34 points ago +35 / -1

How fucking stupid are these people...

look at ragan who says "Not sure if related, just an observation"

Are you fucking kidding me? you're in a thread full of women saying the same thing who all had the vaccine days earlier but you don't know if it's related!!?

Liberalism is a mental illness. Where's the vaccine for that?

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

Where is your argument?

All your ranting and raving consists of screaming terms of service. It's already been pointed out to you that tos are routinely overruled in court so that leaves you with zero, zilch, no argument whatsoever.

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have not provided an argument, at all. Where is it? A Supreme Court Justice just provided a clear concise view on the danger big techs power poses, how they control speech and possible ways to fix it.

You've done nothing, no argument, just paragraph after paragraph of ranting and raving, and still no argument.

So yes; you're a moron. You've provided no argument to attack here, so no ad hominem.

Run along back to /r/politics.

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

Right now, Google/Twitter/Facebook and could be argued Amazon as a backend provider has immense power over the ability for platforms to even exist.

Are you able to bolster your argument without ad hominem attacks?

Nothing ad hominem about it, you really are a moron, you have provided not a single argument here.

11
thxpk 11 points ago +12 / -1

It's still a message sent, remove these idiotic restrictions and people will turn up, keep them and fuck you

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's basically Thomas took it as an opportunity to get his opinion out there with some ideas on how to fix it so we all know where he stands. Still requires a case or legislative change for it to mean anything

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

A company completely controlling the public square and preventing free speech is not relevant to a few companies doing the same with the internet version of the public square?

Are you a moron or are you just here to troll?

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501

Now take your ranting idiocy somewhere else

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

Except they are the public square, and there's precedent to call them as such.

All your ranting doesn't change this fact, the monopoly power big tech has over the 21st century version of the public square must be stopped and useful idiots such as yourself are only aiding their authoritarianism.

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're the one who doesn't seem to understand.

When the public square falls under the control of private enterprise, then the 1st applies and that is exactly what these platforms are nowadays: the public square.

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

You fucking communist.

You're really not too bright are you, you're the one defending the current involvement of government in big tech and want to protect it.

Letting the government control your life...that's literally communism.

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

You really need help.

No one is going to take them over, but to think they are not heavily involved and protected by the government is idiotic.

Now run along fascist

1
thxpk 1 point ago +2 / -1

In-Q-Tel is a venture capital firm funded by the CIA.

At Google, the Keyhole EarthViewer technology that was born from CIA/In-Q-Tel funding was renamed Google Earth.

Peter Thiel — Took In-Q-Tel funding for his startup firm Palantir somewhere around 2004.

1
thxpk 1 point ago +2 / -1

Do you?

It's not exactly secret:

https://qz.com/1145669/googles-true-origin-partly-lies-in-cia-and-nsa-research-grants-for-mass-surveillance/

The CIA and NSA funded an unclassified, compartmentalized program designed from its inception to spur something that looks almost exactly like Google.

0
thxpk 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wrong, big tech was birthed by government. As public companies now you might own shares in them through your IRA etc but their birth and their size were directly helped by government and now protected by government

2
thxpk 2 points ago +3 / -1

I've read this twice and still have no idea wtf you're talking about

view more: Next ›