Well Mark Levin is not hopeful, he just said this
Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow · 11m
Sadly, SCOTUS could not or would not cobble together 4 members to stop the lawlessness that took place by PA officials. It was a very solid case with clear federal ramifications but they denied relief. I’ll discuss at length on my radio show this evening.
yes I know but the belief was they moved the date to not fall on the 9th so they could issue injunctive relief, the fact they denied it immediately is not a good sign. Means they'll consider the case but don't expect relief that fixes anything.
?
It is written in the Constitution:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.
Those states violated the Constitution when they made laws outside of their legislatures
Where does the article say not?
I'm trying to follow your post but your posts are rather scattershot, sorry if I misunderstand.
I don't think that's the angle they are using, they are saying if these states don't abide by the Constitution, then it becomes meaningless. How they didn't abide by it isn't the point because yeh Texas has no say in how PA runs their elections, but if PA ignores the Constitution itself, then those states that don't have a right to ask scotus to enforce the Constitution for it they don't, then what's the point of the union in the first place...
Isn't it right here?
casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
and make the same point I did
but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.
Not sure I agree, the suit is not attacking the jurisdiction each state has over how they run elections, it's pointing out they violated the Constitution (which all States abide by) which if allowed to stand overturns the Constitution itself for all states. If each state can literally ignore the Constitution when they wish, then we're no longer a union.
He's started a couple of good legal cases but overall he's a q tard making us look bad, I don't think Powell is too good either, they really need to shut up with the conspiracy shit and just keep hammering them legally with proper cases.
PA was our best case so it could a strong hint cuck scotus don’t want to touch this at all