2
TippyTop1987 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey a rational person! Good to see that some of us see the value in not alienating like minded people and attempting to censor them. Keep on keeping on.

3
TippyTop1987 3 points ago +3 / -0

We did everything short of a civil war and that may still be on the table. If GEOTUS couldn't stop it, what makes you think that our collective effort could?

Man up, make plan for going forward.

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +2 / -1

Also, account less than 30 minutes old and all post are downvoted and checked full of ad hominem attacks.

You also spell labor with a 'u', you either Canadian, British, or European but unquestionably a faggot.

-1
TippyTop1987 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Complacent huh. Weird, it is almost as if there were globs of Q folks with YouTube channels that had large followings which are extremely valuable on many fronts. They were so complacent that they went to protest, organized protest, and went to tons of Trump rallies. What have you done?

Commies? Now you have exposed yourself as either incredibly retarded or a shill, probably the latter. How do you even reconcile that statement, that is gold medal level of mental gymnastics.

Apparently you don't understand the meaning and use of the word ideology if you believe that qanon supporters don't share your politics.

0
TippyTop1987 0 points ago +1 / -1

Now this is the proper way to throw shade at Qanon without accusing all of your like-minded frens of ruining everything. Every anti Q person should take note, doesn't make sense to alienate and divide people who share the same political philosophy.

2
TippyTop1987 2 points ago +2 / -0

It seems more likely that someone made this and just put those hashtags on there. It doesn't even make sense to have pedogate there unless you are trying to associate something subtly. Pedogate and Q only had a minor overlap as pedogate has been around for decades.

The first obvious thing is the timeline, easily proves this is BS. Now take something that is so retarded and easily disproven and then put your enemies hashtags on it to associate them with this.

Literally an example of controlled opposition

3
TippyTop1987 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have no clue but I would assume that his lawyers would handle that, GEOTUS testimony wouldn't be necessary as the lawyers speak in your place as you exercise your 5th amendment

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually did go to bed right after that. Everyone who says this isn't a Fed lol there is an old quote about the government in regards to liberty:

'It is too late to negotiate with them and to early to shoot them in the face'

A pretty fitting sentiment and it appears that we are rapidly approaching the face shooty part.

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shoot 'em in their fucking faces? I am usually full of ideas but on this subject, this is the only one I can think of.

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think we should reduce the viscosity of their brain matter

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

It just seems that if this were correct, these two people would be in jail already. I mean certain people were spending a lot of energy decrying it in the media and politicians introduced bills against it. There is absolutely 0% chance that our government could not trace and track whoever is behind Qanon. Honestly these point make it more likely that it was either somewhat real or a psyop by either foreigners or our own Intelligence Community.

Obama administration arrested a guy for making a video about Islam. Biden just arrested a guy for a meme. They would certainly hunt down and capture Qanon, unless qanon is an Intel Op.

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

Demoralize people to completely give up on elections and politics all together. Do play dumb boy, you know exactly what I mean or you are willfully ignorant.

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will run out of bombs before we run out of bodies. Also, a lot of regular folks who got out know the layouts of these bases and whatnot, got to be good for something.

0
TippyTop1987 0 points ago +1 / -1

It is right on par with "Probably by sucking more dick cause you're a fag".

You face stupid with even more stupid, that is how these things are done.

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can mental gymnastics this as much as you want, it doesn't change the fact that the words are synonyms. Your example is called 'circumstantial evidence'.

Everyone can see your troll method. Anyone who produces anything and you will just say it isn't proof.

Demoralize and get people to waste time proving something to someone who:

A) just won't look these things up themselves

B) doesn't really want to know and likely has ulterior motives aka shilling.

6
TippyTop1987 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fake and it is a Star of David not a pentagram

1
TippyTop1987 1 point ago +1 / -0

Evidence: noun the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Proof: noun: proof; plural noun: proofs 1.evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement. "you will be asked to give proof of your identity" Similar: evidence

LAW the spoken or written evidence in a trial. the action or process of establishing the truth of a statement. "it shifts the onus of proof in convictions from the police to the public" a series of stages in the resolution of a mathematical or philosophical problem.

Evidence is literally a synonym of proof. Source? Thesaurus.

Reality disagrees with you.

No one gives a fuck what Dominion says, the Edison data says different.

2
TippyTop1987 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about the analysis of the raw election data that shows dozens of precincts reporting in at the same time(down to the millisecond) that shows the exact same ratio of Trump:Biden votes, not humanly possible without an algorithm at play. How about the vote data that was in decimal form, i.e. 46.5 votes for Biden.

Massive vote injections when supposedly shut down for the night.

Georgia destroyed ballots and wiped machine hard drives.

PA SoS website says they received more mail in ballots than they originally sent.

How about the internet packet capture from the machines that aren't supposed to be online? What about the eye witness testimony to wrongful adjudication?

The fucking evidence is plentiful and no one here has to prove it to you. Just go back and watch all of the testimony to the State Legislators that happened in Nov/Dec.

7
TippyTop1987 7 points ago +11 / -4

So even when they aren't here you feel the need to create division? What logic is this?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›