5
tommichael522 5 points ago +5 / -0

For the first time in DECADES the GOP had a higher new Republican registration in PA than the Democrats yet Trump magically "lost." Total and complete bullshit.

3
tommichael522 3 points ago +3 / -0

Totally worth the listen!!! Do it!!

BuT tHaT wAsNT ReAL SoCiALisMssss

4
tommichael522 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sidney Powell said it would be Biblical.....

1
tommichael522 1 point ago +1 / -0

The concern was about how POTUS would "throw conspiracy theories" about how fucked their process is, unsecure their voting machines are and that would undermine the credibility of an election that was NO doubt to be rigged.

THAT was their concern. NOT any of the actual election security concerns they SHOULD be worried about. How POTUS would raise the alarm on their ineptitude and corruption.....that should set off alarm bells to ANYONE.

2
tommichael522 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like the request the demands Gov Kemp announce POTUS won the election in GA

4
tommichael522 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was thinking the same thing...people can attack all they want.....the statistical data HAS been used to strengthen cases of fraud (preponderance of evidence, NOT just beyond a reasonable doubt) such as Enron or other massive fraud cases....hell they even used Benford's law when prosecuting the case....

22
tommichael522 22 points ago +22 / -0

The relief section is INSANE.....here are the first 9 requests....it goes on to request seizure of the vote machines, surveillance video, etc....

For these reasons, Plaintiff asks this Court to enter a judgment in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:

  1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
  2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
  3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
  4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
  5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
  6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4;
  7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
  8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
  9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
25
tommichael522 25 points ago +25 / -0

I mean, I skimmed that initially and went right to the juicy details, I didn't even notice the title etc

1
tommichael522 1 point ago +1 / -0

The post is very cryptic....

20/20 - Hindsight? or Year 2020?

They knew they would be caught and were....purposely? Wasn't 3rd party, meaning Democrats? FBI? CIA?

Odd wording, he's usually much more articulate

1
tommichael522 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, that's unusual for POTUS to actually attend with his attorney. It's not listed on his public calendar either.....this is unprecedented I believe....

1
tommichael522 1 point ago +1 / -0

The initial computer count was not correct. They found 3 other flash drives (compact memory cards) that weren't tallied. They found this error during the hand recount. This was only found during a hand recount there was no safe guard to alert them to this. So no, the hand recount didn't line-up exactly with the machine tabulation initially. And worse, wouldn't you expect the hand recount to line up EXACTLY to the computer tally? Why wouldn't this be exactly accurate?

1
tommichael522 1 point ago +1 / -0

IMO either forged ballots or ballots which should have been DQ'd being tabulated (ie no signature, fake address, etc).

Their handcount actually located several thousand ballots they initially missed and wouldn't have found otherwise.

2
tommichael522 2 points ago +2 / -0

the significance of this is it was a leak from 2008 where states/gov were made aware of how easy these systems which were largely in PA and other states were easily exploited.

The cable leak has a 158 page file documented which also details how the server which tabulated the vote could also be easily compromised.

None of this is new it just confirms what the Trump lawyers have been saying with solid sources.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›