Sorry, but how does that make sense? If the mics were shopped in, then it would take much more effort to edit the video to have Biden's hands go over the mics. If they were just layering mics on top of the footage, his hands would go behind it with no added effort. Am I missing something?
You understand how notifications work, right? I had only just seen the notifications with your comments (just like right now). It didn't require me to remember anything at all. On the other hand, you brought me up in another thread and it wasn't in reply to anything I said.
Oh hey, turns out this site notifies you when someone links your username. But I don't get what I have to do with this post at all. Are you saying I live at a mailbox? No need, it seems I already started living rent-free in your mind since you brought me up on an unrelated thread.
People with illogical thought processes tend to get aggressive when you point out they're being illogical, so I'm not surprised by your response at all. Imagine thinking thedonald.win would be removing links to video-hosting site to take away its "clicks" when thedonald.win doesn't even host videos itself (therefore not a competitor) and doesn't remove YouTube links, either... Your original comment just attacked the mods based on your inability to think rationally (this is the best-case scenario, assuming you aren't just a shill deliberately trying to sow discord between the users and the mods), so of course someone was going to correct you when you started swinging your fists around blindfolded.
It's obvious this video was removed by Streamable and has nothing at all to do with .win mods. Streamable is what almost every video posted here uses and .win doesn't have its own video-hosting, so it's not even a competitor in any capacity, therefore it's completely illogical to think .win would be removing Streamable links...
Yeah, the person you replied to was explaining that a comma and period actually do not always have totally different meanings universally (as was claimed). He or she clearly wasn't defending it or anything like that.
The body needs carbs to survive and zero carb diets can be very dangerous and counter productive.
I'm sorry, but this is just not true. Carbs literally fall into the category of nonessential nutrients, unlike fat and protein which are both essential. Only babies need some external carbs (hence breastfeeding, in which the baby gets milk which has lots of natural carbs), but certainly not adults. The liver (except for babies) actually creates the amount of glucose your body needs without you needing to consume any carbs. There are lots of "zero carb"/carnivore individuals who have been going for 10, 15, 20+ years who not only do not have any related medical problems, but are doing exceedingly well compared to the average person. Nutrition studies over the decades have been infected by grain and sugar companies and vegan groups, and hence there is a lot of bias. But also many of the methodologies used in nutrition studies are absolute garbage for actually figuring out the effects of nutrition.
?? Did you not watch the whole debate? There is no way you actually watched the debate if you think Biden "owned" President Trump. And to watch Biden bumble around and lie throughout the debate, and also, by the way, throw out more playground insult potshots at Trump than Trump at Biden, and then act like Biden's performance was somehow better or even close to being on par with Trump's is beyond delusional. You don't have any idea what you're talking about.
But that doesnt make any sense as a response to the claim that masks are not to protect yourself, but to protect others. No one has ever said masks are to protect yourself, unless they were retarded and didn't understand the original argument since the beginning. Your response is basically, "If your mask works to protect me from your cough, then why worry about me coughing on you without a mask?" See why that doesn't make sense?
By the way, I'm not even slightly worried about getting coronavirus and so I don't personally care if other people do or don't wear masks, I just think people need to get better arguments. If what you think I'm saying is that I'm pro-mask, you're reading me completely wrong. All I'm doing is showing you why your particular argument wouldn't work unless the other person also doesn't understand the original stated purpose for masks.
Yep, I eat exclusively animal products--always meat or fish (but mostly meat), sometimes butter, sometimes cheese--and it's great, I'm the healthiest and most active I've ever been in my life. My weight is medically normal (has been for over a year now) and people thought I'd stop after I lost the weight, but honestly I just feel way, way better this way so I'm not stopping.
A vegan diet results in many more animal deaths than a carnivore diet. One cow's death is enough to feed you for months, whereas a vegan's diet results in numerous field critters dying.
Also, meat didn't make you fat, it's everything you ate with the meat. If you ate only meat, real meat, you would not get fat unless you tried very hard to. Vegans have a nutritionally deficient diet, and it's bad for their brains.
A vegan diet truly does not make sense, both nutritionally and morally.
You actually consider your suppositions as equal or greater than those who actually have knowledge on the matter and have devoted their entire lives on this...
That's a bold claim. How do you know that? No one linked the commenter above to any sources with the credentials you mentioned. He literally said, "I have never heard the claim before," so clearly he doesn't think what you're saying.
worrisome.
The only thing that's "worrisome" is the level of condescension in your reply to riverc...
logic is inferior to empirical knowledge.
This is an odd statement about logic. Logic isn't inferior even a little bit, it's just different and would be applied to different situations. And I grant you that history is an example where I would clearly expect empirical evidence to be used instead of logic. Logic and empirical study are both just tools for reasoning about things, and sometimes one tool is better-suited than another for a different task.
Sure, he thinks from a risk-management perspective that wearing a mask in certain places makes sense, but he's exhaustively discussed why "follow the science" and similar phrases are extremely dumb. Not sure if you watch his livestreams regularly, but this comic strip is completely consistent with the opinions he's expressed since day one, and a clear wink to his livestream audience.