That's not fascism. You just changed the definition to weaponize it against your political opponents. Most of those you listed apply to every poltiical party if you remove "undermining democracy" which i'm not sure how you can argue leftists arent doing (selective censorship, mail-in voting, etc, illegals campaigning and voting, etc, illegals on census)
This article is garbage. We don't have to prove each case of fraud (impossible since they won't let anyone examine the evidence), we have to prove that there are no controls to prevent fraud which is true. A good video outlining all the indications of fraud:
it'd be impossible to prove wrong, except you'd have even less evidence.
you know you can just test masks, which has already been done as I pointed out in my comment?
That's easier than going back in time and removing all restrictions and comparing the results.
world would have been infected in only a few months
The projections have been way off so I think this a fallacy. You can just continue saying it would've been worse without it and it's not possible to prove it wrong.
The studies would show strong evidence to support masks, but the largest study was inconclusive and that's with proper masks. Lots of people wear shitty cloth and they force kids to wear masks because it gives them a false sense of security. They will mess up kids faces to virtue signal.
No evidence that the vaccines stop transmission