I'm going to give you a little inside baseball: A few people went to Matze looking to help out with server space -- they needed literally thousands of instances to run Parler for the size of their userbase (poor engineering -- I can do their same traffic with 2 orders of magnitude less). You know what his answer was?
"It's all good -- I got this."
When I heard that, I realized Parler was done while he was still CEO, so this is a good thing for getting Parler back online now that he's out.
FYI, if you want to know why the votes happen in groups of 4,800, it's because that's the limit they train into the poll workers to switch out the compact flash. Since they use 16GB compact flashes and the file size of the image is quite big (for adjudication), the compact flash doesn't fit very many on it. It can theoretically hold something like 5,700 images, so they change them out around 4,800 to be safe.
Now when you combine that with pre-loaded temporary batches that are stored locally on a tabulator....you get fuckery.
I hesitate to put out what I personally think went on, as the data of the senate runoff shows they looked at aspects of what we put out and tried to correct it all (they didn't correct the stuff we didn't put out, which still shows that things were manipulated).
The overseas thing is them doing the Kansas City Shuffle -- the real steal is happening right here on our shores.
Just keep in mind he, along with every other senator and Mike Pence did not want to hear a single thing the Data Integrity Group had found about election fraud. We were there days before the vote and were scheduled to meet with some senators, but they all canceled (Marsha Blackburn, Ted Cruz, etc.).
I went to D.C. thinking that going with definite proof was going to help things, but these 100% corrupt senators (every...single....Republican as well) proved me naive.
We’ll have to figure out some other path forward from here.
I'll tell you straight up that when we briefed Cruz's team on election fraud, they wouldn't even push us up to talk to Ted. Everyone, and I mean everyone in the senate was just acting like they were interested, but weren't actually interested. It was a giant act. All the verifiable data, and no one from Blackburn, to Hawley, to even Pence's team (they denied a meeting with us) wanted to know what actually happened.
Don't trust a SINGLE senator in the senate and don't trust Mike Pence.
Mark Meadows blocked us at every turn as well.
There's also about 4 good congressmen.
Now that the Jan 6th vote is done, I think it’s time to take a look at Lindsey’s race, because I have the Secretary of State’s data for South Carolina. We didn’t have time to go any deeper than the presidential race, but we do now.
All you need to know is that we spoke with Ted’s chief of staff and a few others to get actual election fraud data, and Ted didn’t want to hear anything about real proof of fraud.
That's not true at all. Pollbooks have nothing to do with this.
This data is what gets sent to the secretary of state for certification. You can go to the secretary of state website and go directly to the URL I linked in another comment.
Please don't spread any misinformation in this thread. We've already outlined in a previous video where this data fits in the picture: https://rumble.com/vc5nk7-georgia-a-close-look-at-the-data-and-events-of-the-general-election-chapter.html
Definitely -- I'm working on a sort of deeper analysis. Can anyone work on getting those aligned to the timestamps? The timestamps are in EST in the files btw.
No one really knows where the servers are -- I believe they're in Tampa, FL. It's kind of neither here nor there. Let's focus on looking at the raw data.
Already caught 33,000 votes switched in real time.
Biggs and Gosar have been two staunch supporters of our group (the Data Integrity Group), and helping us to get the data to the right people. They are true patriots.
👍
We had a call with him a month ago and he was bullshitting us. He didn’t even have the machine learning algorithm developed and was presenting it like it was a done deal. Look, I build software for a living and even build a couple machine learning pieces that analyze contract terms from large contract documents, as well as lead analysis for phone call leads — I know bullshit vapor ware when I see it.
You won't find the official data on anyone else's sources, because they didn't scrape the SCYTL data.
I'm the one in the presentation (not the first guy this video links to, Dave, but Justin). Here is the rawest version of the SCYTL data for the entire state of Georgia:
If you want to verify the results of each individual entry on scytl, you would take the URL template https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/GA/${electionId}/${versionId}/json/ALL.json
So for example: https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/GA/105369/270190/json/ALL.json
Go forth and confirm, patriot.
I’m one of the ones giving this presentation, and I’ll be there on the 6th. Hopefully will be able to convince some legislators that we’re meeting with prior to the vote with the data showing Trump won the election (we have him winning Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan at the very least — need to do more analysis on other states).
Because it’s really hard to do lengthy analysis, boil points down into simple terms, and create animations.
Awesome, thanks!
Just FYI, this is actually Dave Lobue (I'm Justin Mealey).
When doing work that you deem is important, the most vital thing you can have is focus. A lot of the times that means putting to the side all of the noise that surrounds a certain path. The poll pads are the noise when it comes to the actual ability to commit fraud during this election.
If you were creating a system to enact a fraud, how many points of contact would you design for that system to interface with in the voting process? How many confederates would you need to enable in that system? One way we've discovered only requires one true confederate to enact in a county, and we've actually identified some of these actual confederates. Depending on how things go, we might have to just release that in a video in the future.
My point being, that while your intentions are good (as most everyone's on this site's are), they distract from the actual fraud. By distracting from the actual fraud, parts of which we've proved through hard data analysis, it actually detracts from the ability for us to bring that fraud to light and abolish it.
Please, for the love of God, stop talking about poll pads.
That’s between them and God. The Republican members were very happy with the presentation afterwards, though.
It’s both false and misleading. We’ve talked to Jovan’s team, and that was one of biggest wastes of times during this process.
Understand that by promoting this guy, you’re only promoting someone whose interest is not in righting the wrongs of this election (he’s not patriotic one bit), but in obtaining government contracts to work on auditing all the absentee ballots, hence his attempt to patent the process. Do some research on the guy (who changed his legal name to Jovan Pulitzer, so you’ll have to look at his previous name as well).
Yes, we’ve painstakingly mapped out the entire process, interviewed poll workers, adjudicators, IT people at the Secretary of State, and much more in trying to piece together the entire path a vote takes.
Along with that, the evidence from the certain forensic looks at the memory cards themselves show exactly what i mentioned about ballot images being destroyed and replaced by a new image and with no metadata of the previous image. It’s just how the system is designed.
Even if they weren’t prepared at all, they should still be able to migrate by now — it’s been almost a month!