I understand your frustration level. I'd suggest putting as much excess stress and anger into noise before escalating to violence, but absolutely people should have their head on a swivel and be prepared to defend themselves - https://thedonald.win/p/11ROGp2syr/a-suggestion-was-to-bring-trumpe/
I appreciate you sharing the information and the risks. I agree that is important to know. NY has a bill in progress to allow them to separate you from your family for pretty wide-open reasons. Those people also don't care about law and order.
I think giving your family input to the risks being faced is realistic.
Do you want to attend possibly the biggest rally of all time for the continued success of America, with the risk of being hurt by bad actors because there are evil powers that want to take away our freedom?
Or, do you want to stand back and see what happens, and possibly wake up one morning and find out you'll never need to share the xbox with your sibling again? (Keep in mind your social credit score might not be high enough to allow you to actually play the xbox.)
However, if there is evil and violence against ANYONE, the police should still do their job to the best of their ability, and it should DEFINITELY be posted about because there is no world where that should be expected or acceptable.
Yes, need to redirect pedes to music and noise. https://thedonald.win/p/11ROGp2syr/a-suggestion-was-to-bring-trumpe/
Bring a horn or kazoo or something :) https://thedonald.win/p/11ROGp2syr/a-suggestion-was-to-bring-trumpe/c/
Great call, this is exactly what is needed.
It looks like he read that?
He lit the prairie fires of freedom, with thousands showing up to his events.
So what what I've heard is that the case was not actually ruled on, it was simply determined as not having "standing", possibly because the electors have not actually been assigned yet?
This could leave it open to be resubmitted later if electors are assigned.
The other thing is that this case came from nowhere in a very short time, and it at least got some media attention somehow because my coworkers were bashing on Texas about it :(.
Since even the "Trump appointed" justices took this particular action, it makes it clear they are not "Trump controlled judges". When a case with "standing" comes in (Sidney says there are some) and they decide on that cases merits, there will be history to show that these new "trump appointed" justices are not just going to side with just "anything republican", that they are doing their job and following the law.
It's a long shot, but I'm hoping it helps people on all sides trust upcoming Supreme Court decisions that are yet to come.
Wow, you are SO correct that those three justices in particular voting against this is VERY important because it proves those justices are unbiased as judges should be, and that is what I WANT the Supreme Court to be.
I'm spamming Lin Woods tweet on these because I think it is relevant. https://thedonald.win/p/11QlYR0ZpZ/holy-lin-wood--hes-speaking-on-a/c/
I suspect this lady isn't just crazy and this is much more than just TDS, she is pushing us hoping to divide us, hoping for us to start fighting with each other.
As hard as it is, let your TDS friends and family know you love them and care for them even through all of this, as your relationship CAN be stronger than the brainwashing, and we will need them to see past the violence if it happens to realize that isn't what we want for each other.
We need to keep our head on a swivel, and we still need to keep what Lin Wood shared earlier in mind. https://thedonald.win/p/11QlYR0ZpZ/holy-lin-wood--hes-speaking-on-a/c/
So THAT is what Lin Wood is talking about: https://thedonald.win/p/11QlYR0ZpZ/holy-lin-wood--hes-speaking-on-a/c/
It's her twin /s No, it's her clone /s No, it's just that no one bothers to change clothes anymore because they never leave the house /s No, she was the first, and just still IS the first too /s Obviously it is just a timezone difference since one of those clearly says UK on it /s They are both true as written, and this is just evidence of a mandela effect /s
Why does the one picture make it look like the nurse is about to backhand the lady?
My guess is jet fuel must have been involved /s
Hmm, well if you think of it that way, Warnock probably internally believes or outright knows Trump won, but there is a big difference between believing it, and supporting the fight to make it happen.
Which one of them is most likely to contribute to a "legal avenue" for Trump to win. I respect that she didn't say "he won", because after all she isn't the media, and the media told me that they declare the winner /s.
There is Q, and there are anons (who scam, grift, and sometimes research).
I agree there have been plenty of scammers around Q.
When I look at Q now, I believe nothing directly at face value because I now recognize that I don't have the context or purpose for the message. As an example "Trust Sessions". I could assume that message is meant for me so I'll 'feel better' that Sessions hasn't taken any actions yet and I can trust he will, but that doesn't accomplish much. What purpose might that message serve if you wanted to flush out bad actors working with Sessions? Would it cause similar confusion for bad actors too?
As a follow-on to the above, I have the belief that Epstein would have never been arrested if Trump had not been in office.
None of us can prove that directly, but there are snippets of media where 'truth' leaks out that support that view. One is Trump himself talking about Clinton saying something like 'I think he has some really big problems with that island coming up'. Another one is a video of Cindy McCain saying 'We all knew about Epstein'. However, it is clear that they KNEW, but did NOTHING to stop him, enabling the corruption.
Those are the types of things that never would have been surfaced without additional research, that the mainstream media is never going to focus on. That is why I find value in reading the Q drops, but they aren't there for you to 'believe', they are there for you to do your own research and think for yourself.
It seems like most/much of it isn't to be taken literally, but gives you context to research and gives you enough information that you can ask better questions and be more informed.
As an example, I may have heard about Epstein Island in the past in other places before Q came about, but seeing Q post about it and then seeing him actually/eventually get arrested was a really big happening. Epstein's eventual arrest probably would have happened either way, but I wouldn't have recognized it as important or understood how it is connected to something much bigger. When I shared Epstein's arrest with family who consume mainstream media, they barely knew anything about it, and I would have been in that same boat.
It is easy to get sucked in to predicting things based on what Q has posted, where people doing their own research think they have figured out something that is about to happen. I've believed in those predictions that a few times now and they've consistently not panned out, so I have learned to keep other peoples predictions very separate from the information that is actually shared.
I've been listening to him quite a bit lately. I can't really tell when he is "pacing and leading" for some ulterior persuasion purpose and when he legitimately believes something.
I like that he is willing to present the alternate view/spin. He described watching the events on video and having a different "movie" playing in your head about what is actually happening.
So many of us can't understand how people don't see Trump the way that we see Trump, but Scott showing the other "movie" lets me see what they see a bit, giving me a slightly better understanding of what we are up against.
After listening to him, I almost started to doubt the video myself. The good thing about this is it got me to pay even closer attention to additional information around the video. The biggest one being the media actually stating that people were sent home and mentioning the water pipe burst that doesn't appear to have happened.
We are up against masters of persuasion and Scott is giving us insight into that.
One of the witnesses on one of these videos mentioned someone with white-out tape they appeared to be applying to the machine, possibly over a sensor?
Unity in this context means slavery, so the choice offered is really slavery or war. However, even that isn't accurate. They aren't really offering a choice of 'war'. Who are "they" that we would go to war with? What they are really offering for choices seem to be "slavery" or "chaos".
We have many better options than "chaos".
The thing is we are already free so of course we don't choose slavery. We are already capable of protecting our freedom, and we are currently doing so in an organized and persistent manner throughout our systems of government.
hmm, what could they offer Hunter?
We've got to make it or make it, these are the options https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cIqV9EpMbI
Please fart in elevators around these people.