1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump probably doesn't have to return to Twitter. He gets more news coverage than anyone else in the word.

Although, he would be smart to save it for a late election push. He would essentially dominate the news cycle from that point on.

3
tylersfarley 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm surprised more people don't realize this.

Trump even knows this will happen, but we don't know his plan yet.

All the elites have been making moves for this. That's why Fox News is shuffling things.

When it happens, they don't want a single person in the media questioning it. That's why Tucker is gone.

Anyone on YouTube questioning it will get banned.

5
tylersfarley 5 points ago +5 / -0

The irony is that the Tweet was sexist. Why can't a women be sexy and like guns at the same time?

Why is a woman in a bikini promoting beer a bad thing? Can women not wear bikinis?

Who is exactly handing out permission as to when a woman can be sexy and when she cant?

3
tylersfarley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tucker has a handshake deal with Elon, that's about it. He can't make a deal yet.

Truth is, they are prepping for when Trump is removed from the ballots.

Trump will not be allowed to make it to election day. Republican voters need to stop and think how they plan on facing that.

1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legally, I think that guy is in trouble. Not saying that's right, but it's important to understand the law so you make the decision that works best for you.

For a self defense claim, you must prove you felt your life or possibly someone else's life was in immediate danger.

What they'll argue is that this guy probably trained that choke hold so he was aware if he held it for that long, it could be deadly. Hence, he knowingly used deadly force.

So they will argue deadly force was not justified in this situation and it is similar to if you pulled a gun and shot a guy for yelling on a train.

Legally, choking someone to death or shooting them to death is essentially the same thing. So you need the same justification for both.

2
tylersfarley 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm obviously 100% against pedos. But this guy was exposing high level secrets then suddenly he gets hit with this child porn charge.

There could be a lot going on here. You hit him with these charges, tell him if he shuts up he can plea it down and avoid jail.

It's one of the ways they silence critics.

18
tylersfarley 18 points ago +18 / -0

Also, I doubt there are young kids there.

That's the whole thing. Republicans don't give a shit about drag queens. They care about drag queens being forced on young kids.

5
tylersfarley 5 points ago +5 / -0

In separate documents viewed by CNBC, Google said it’s cutting back on fitness classes, staplers, tape and the frequency of laptop replacements for employees.

14
tylersfarley 14 points ago +14 / -0

Trump did an interview with 60 minutes as well. Notice how Republicans are the only ones willing to do interviews with the "opposite" team?

Because they have faith in their convictions and know they are right. Democrats are too afraid to debate.

7
tylersfarley 7 points ago +7 / -0

Problem is, many animals die much earlier when in captivity. No matter how nice you make it, they die early.

3
tylersfarley 3 points ago +4 / -1

If so, someone is getting arrested. The Governor just talked about it. I assume since they made him look like a fool on national TV, he's going to issue an investigation.

Also, only proof it's fake is the poster happens to sell stuff online. Not really sure posting fake explosion videos helps her sell women's clothes. Could be though.

1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate YouTube and Google along with most big tech. But I'm also a little burned out on "guntubers". They are all chasing money at this point. Very few post any decent or even accurate information.

All of them are now constantly begging for money. Some of the big ones make $5K per upload or more just with ads and video plays. Then they have the balls to ask for donations to "support the channel" and keep it running..lol.

Do they really need tens of thousands of dollars a month to produce that shitty content? No, they pocket all that money and laugh all the way to the bank.

17
tylersfarley 17 points ago +19 / -2

Let me give you guys some tips. YouTube "creators" are all mini-sociopaths. ALL OF THEM.

You have no idea the amount of narcissism required to reach that level of YouTube success. To constantly make videos and promote yourself 24/7 exceeds even the narcissism in Hollywood. To sit and make videos all day, then edit videos of yourself all day and be obsessed with the view count of each one. It's actually bizarre when you think about it. That's why they all end up making everything personal and "about them". Because they literally sit and watch themselves on a screen all day and obsess over the views and other metrics.

That doesn't mean some of these people may not have good opinions that line up with you nor does it mean they can't do any good. Some of these guys have been a net positive for the most part.

But they are all divas. That's what this is, a little bitch fight among divas.

1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can say that about anybody though. People have to understand Trump's main goal is getting back into office. Nothing matters if he can't do that.

Nothing gets fixed in the next two years anyway. All his moves will be to pave the way for him to get back.

If Trump doesn't win in 2024, all the "maga" people in congress that are popular will instantly turn into RINOS.

0
tylersfarley 0 points ago +1 / -1

Trump has been planning his comeback everyday for two years. I trust him that he needed this guy in place for some reason to get back in office.

Without Trump, none of the guys you like Jordan would even speak up. So it's basically Trump or nothing, at least politically.

1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is EXACTLY how the news justifies pushing their own agenda. Similar to headlines like "Twitter is horrified by Trump's latest statements. Here's why".

That's an excuse for the news agency to write an article about Trump by claiming they are just reporting on what others are saying.

1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do realize this is EXACTLY how the news justifies pushing their own agenda. Similar to headlines like "Twitter is horrified by Trump's latest statements. Here's why".

That's an excuse for the news agency to write an article about Trump by claiming they are just reporting on what others are saying.

1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +1 / -0

You do realize this is EXACTLY how the news justifies pushing their own agenda. Similar to headlines like "Twitter is horrified by Trump's latest statements. Here's why".

That's an excuse for the news agency to write an article about Trump by claiming they are just reporting on what others are saying.

by ZIKE
4
tylersfarley 4 points ago +4 / -0

The problem with these computer generated articles is they only make sense if the person reading it already knows the definitions. If not, this is all gibberish.

For example, if someone doesn't know what cryptocurrencies are, they definitely don't know what a distributed ledger is in that context.

This is why a real writer would explain those things because they know the audience they are targeting does not know the definition.

2
tylersfarley 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol. How is selling an NFT different from selling hats or shirts like every other candidate does?

Was selling MAGA hats grifting?

6
tylersfarley 6 points ago +13 / -7

So you want "advisors" to be running the show?

You mean like with Biden or every other puppet leader?

Trump's biggest blunders were when HE DID listen to advisors. His best moves were when he did what he wanted.

2
tylersfarley 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the FBI/CIA and establishment media will treat DeSantis fairly and let him win just because he's not Trump?

Yeah, that's not how this works.

6
tylersfarley 6 points ago +6 / -0

One thing will never change everything. Just like one bullet doesn't win a war.

But over time, these things are adding up. Nobody said it would be easy.

1
tylersfarley 1 point ago +4 / -3

You're talking about the White House. This is Trump's civilian home. He is not forced to have people checked. He can allow anyone inside that he wants.

The Secret Service have no say over Trump in his own home or anywhere else as he's simply a civilian. They can suggest things, but they can not overrule him.

view more: Next ›