There are really just some things that the government needs to stay completely out of, but you have control freaks in high positions, and they feel the need to micromanage everything.
Luckily everything in nature is cyclic, so a period of tyranny will eventually be graced with a period of liberty. We can only hope that period of tyranny will run out of steam... soon... eventually...
The irony is that the Democrat standards towards non-white people, or "minorities" as they like to say, are so low that it is indeed quite insulting.
I live in Canada, and we need to present an ID to be able to vote. If the "minorities" in Canada can present an ID, then there is absolutely no excuse that the "minorities" in America can't do the same.
Here are just some examples of inaccuracies:
-
They are assuming a positive PCR test must necessary mean an infection by COVID-19, which is ignoring the possibility of false positives.
-
They are mixing people who died with the virus with people who died by the virus.
-
They are undercounting vaccine deaths.
It is a "war" with many battles.
Some battles were lost and some were won, but there are still many more battles to be fought, and hopefully those battles will be won.
One of those important battles is the battle for the media, because those who control the media, control the narrative, and those who control the narrative, control the country.
The riots by Antifa and BLM are far worst than what happened on January 6th. Was anything ever lit on fire on January 6th? I believe people were walking in straight lines inside the building as well as cleaning up after themselves when it was time to leave.
What happened on January 6th was no riot. It was a peaceful protest... an actual peaceful protest.
The point she is making is that the health officials are applying two completely different standards to counting COVID-19 deaths vs counting vaccine deaths.
They are very lenient with COVID-19 deaths, so people who die with COVID-19 are counted as killed by COVID-19, but very strict with vaccine deaths, so people who die shortly after getting the vaccine may not be counted as killed by the vaccine.
I understand what you mean, but it is possible that Lindell and Trump are tackling "different aspects of the problem" simultaneously. Lindell is going after the machines, while Trump is going after the corrupt politicians.
I think both their work are valuable, because assuming that Lindell succeeds and election integrity returns, now you also have Trump's new line of candidates that Americans can vote for.
That is just my personal opinion.
He will be jailed, but if he committed no crime, then the charges will be dismissed and he won't be imprisoned.
He can request a trial by jury, and if the prosecutors have no evidence of crime, then they have a very weak case, which will lead to a dismissal.
They are doing it purely to intimidate, but if this man, who was arrested, committed no crime, then he will never be thrown in prison.
Intimidation won't stop people from liking or supporting Trump, so it is a futile for the FBI to keep this up.
It is just a really complicated way for people like Chris Wray to say:
"If I agree with it, then it is not terrorism, but if I disagree with it, then it is."
The definition he is using is purely subjective, which is a meaningless definition. A much more meaningful definition would be to check for the presence of large-scale physical violence.
If there is large-scale physical violence, then it is terrorism; otherwise, it is not.
As a general rule, it may be best to only punish specific individuals for specific crimes, because punishing groups or attempts to punish groups will always lead to some form of persecution or discrimination.
I don't believe every Muslim should be blamed for the 9/11 attacks, and I don't believe every person at the Capitol Protest was evil. The reality is that most are good, and there are only a few bad actors.
I am aware of the presence of Antifa members at the Capitol Protest.
The problem with a lot of people is that they declare themselves as "not political", and as such they make the mistake of watching mainstream media with the false assumption that the media is unbiased.
The result is that they become "mind-controlled" or "brainwashed" without even knowing.
The only "cure" is to do one's own research or to get information from a variety of sources instead of just one.
You will probably have better luck with the lower courts than the upper courts, as some of the lower courts seem more reasonable.
The following are some examples:
- Michigan judge ordered release of Antrim county forensics report.
- Arizona judge stated senate can access ballots for auditing.
- Georgia judge ordered Dominion documents to be made accessible.
There could be more that I missed, but I think focusing on the lower courts will likely yield much better results.
The interesting bit about corruption is that it may not require that many corrupt individuals in order to create a massive "conspiracy".
All it takes are a few corrupt individuals and everyone else simply "following orders", and if it goes on long enough, then you have a "conspiracy".