This is apparently from a Google whistleblower according to Project Veritas...
The following is a link to "The American Spectator" article, which makes reference to the internal document and the Project Veritas article:
These people who are so offended by pictures and words and want them banned are also the exact same people whose policies are causing physical harm to everyone in the country.
I consider this to be a form of decadence: when emotions, or things that drive emotion, are deemed more harmful than actions that actually cause physical harm.
Tucker Carlson isn't wrong on a lot of things... It is just such a shame that he won't cover any of the election fraud evidence, likely because Fox News told him not to.
If many more reporters like Tucker Carlson covered the evidence, then it is entirely possible that things would be very different today.
There is a copy of the PDF on ResearchGate at the following link:
I am not so sure that is a fair analogy, to be honest. The analogy given also seems to justify "double-masking", which is suspicious to say the least.
I think if masks really did have a pronounce effect on the number of cases, then we would see it in the case count graphs, and yet, we do not.
As they say: theory is the same as practice... in theory, but not in practice.
I never understood the mindset of people who are scared that others are not wearing masks.
If masks really did work to stop infections, then only the person who is scared of infection needs to wear a mask. This idea that everyone needs to wear one... that sort of implies masks don't work... so why wear one to begin with?
I am not even white, and yes I have to agree that the phrase "white supremacist" is today used much more like a slur, and not so much to actually denote people like Hitler.
The problem with using this slur constantly is that it stops meaningful discussion of relevant topics, which only hurts society in the long run.
I do not disagree with you; however, it is propaganda... Propaganda is that power that I was referring to.
The only solution is to "seize" the media, as those who control the media, control the narrative, and those who control the narrative, control the country.
It is the power of the media. The media can make:
-
the good appear evil and the evil appear good.
-
the right appear wrong and the wrong appear right.
-
the intelligent appear stupid and the stupid appear intelligent.
-
the harmless appear dangerous and the dangerous appear harmless.
The list goes on and on...
I still feel a strong control over the media and the narrative would weaken/nullify most of the above "goals".
It is difficult pushing an ideology if that ideology is actively criticized/dismantled by the media, so the goal of Americans should be to "seize" the media.
It is important to remember that this is a "war", so there are many battles to be won, and one of the most important battles is the battle for the media, which is the battle for the narrative.
Hopefully in the future there will be more and more strong media outlets that share this type of information with everyone in the country and around the world.
Doug Ford is the Premier of Ontario, Canada and he owns a store called Deco Labels, which may be a conflict of interest.
Are there any conflict of interest cases in America?