Interesting thanks.
Nvidia a few months ago announced their AI green screen technology, and it's in use right now in their RTX cards.
Intel is saying the hate speech detection 'will be' (not 'could be') in the latest hardware. I'm not sure if this is in the same category as a computer game, which is almost expected to be hyped to extremes, especially given that it's a AAA title with a popular Hollywood actor. What happened with 2077? I didn't follow it closely. Over promised and under delivered?
Video is slowed down https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbtuTX3EH6s
This was part of his answer following from the previous question "But at what point is it not so harmless" link to the timestamp. Out of context one might assume he is advocating for this. He's probably saying this is when it's not so harmless.
There's a statistic that only 1% of adverse effects are reported.
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/01/only-one-percent-of-vaccine-reactions-reported-to-vaers/
They've changed it again. It now says that it can also be by exposing people to it, but the WHO's preference is through vaccination.
@EdwardSolomon A couple of suggestions for your presentations in person if I may - problems I see many speakers have. I've not seen your work before so please excuse me if you know all this.
It is hard to assimilate information if you do not know the context or main point of the presentation. Make it clear at the outset that you are providing analysis that proves, not just gives evidence about, the existence of an algorithm that switches votes. And at the outset, give the claimed and actual numbers that you have worked out, so the audience knows how much of a role the algorithm played. When there's context, it's much easier to take on board lots of information.
My second suggestion is to ask the audience to stop you where they are lost or need clarification. When you lose someone on a point, don't clarify it until they understand it, and move on to the next point which required understanding the previous point, it is impossible for the logic brain to follow for the rest of the presentation completely. Instead the information falls into the 'interesting but not proven' compartment of their brain. If you get them from A to B to C to D etc, D will make sense, but if they got lost at B or C, D won't make sense. I very often see presentations where the audience asks questions about B or C after the presentation has ended, making the whole thing difficult for them to process in a few seconds which took you thirty minutes to thoroughly process with them.
Democrat women
Why is her being a woman relevant? We saw the democrat guy sat close to the doxxer lady in yesterday's hearing, who was equally uninterested in the truth and unruly.
This guy - https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql6Pr8HG/no-one-comes-forward-because-dem/c/
"It is clear that an era associated with attempts to build a centralised unipower world order is over" - Putin. Source