@EdwardSolomon A couple of suggestions for your presentations in person if I may - problems I see many speakers have. I've not seen your work before so please excuse me if you know all this.
It is hard to assimilate information if you do not know the context or main point of the presentation. Make it clear at the outset that you are providing analysis that proves, not just gives evidence about, the existence of an algorithm that switches votes. And at the outset, give the claimed and actual numbers that you have worked out, so the audience knows how much of a role the algorithm played. When there's context, it's much easier to take on board lots of information.
My second suggestion is to ask the audience to stop you where they are lost or need clarification. When you lose someone on a point, don't clarify it until they understand it, and move on to the next point which required understanding the previous point, it is impossible for the logic brain to follow for the rest of the presentation completely. Instead the information falls into the 'interesting but not proven' compartment of their brain. If you get them from A to B to C to D etc, D will make sense, but if they got lost at B or C, D won't make sense. I very often see presentations where the audience asks questions about B or C after the presentation has ended, making the whole thing difficult for them to process in a few seconds which took you thirty minutes to thoroughly process with them.
Democrat women
Why is her being a woman relevant? We saw the democrat guy sat close to the doxxer lady in yesterday's hearing, who was equally uninterested in the truth and unruly.
This guy - https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql6Pr8HG/no-one-comes-forward-because-dem/c/
He is covering China, Big Tech, erosion of American values, calling out divisive MSM tropes etc. I think he genuinely cares for America. If he was in it for himself, he would just do what all the MSM parrots are doing and collect his paycheque.
I'm seeing a lot of Tucker hate here. I don't know how much of it is genuine - we've been brigaded a lot recently.
Tucker talked last night about this issue. "100% of the votes cast, were cast for Joe Biden. That doesn't seem plausible." He had a senior legal advisor for the Trump campaign on the show to talk about it.
Tucker has a 40 minute window with the 20 minutes of adverts. There are hysterical voices left right and centre in the MSM contributing to the emotional charging of the nation; Tucker is by far the most watched news show, and wisely he reports the facts but with a positive mindset. If people are running around with their hair on fire, that's just going to replace one set of problems with a different set. I'm not talking about ignoring the facts; I'm talking about knowing the facts but dealing with them in a coherent and rational frame of mind.
Tucker has gone after big groups that the MSM doesn't touch. China, Big Tech, Biden corruption, Soros, the swamp etc. He's a force for good. Give the man a little space - he's getting the information to the people in his 40 minute window. He will continue to cover the fraud.
Don't forget his good work so readily.
I feel like we didn't watch the same show tonight. Tucker opened with the constant attempt to steal the republic. "We came very close tonight." Tucker said.
The rest of his show was the wider perspective of that issue, reporting the hiding of ballot counting, Trump admin lawsuits, the problem with mail-in ballots, debunking the MSM's favorite trope that Trump is disliked by minorities, ridiculing the MSM's polls and their superior morality. Tucker has to dismantle these things that might appear less important to some of us, but they are insidious ideas that continue to flourish if they're not challenged.
268 includes the 1 from Maine. https://www.270towin.com/maps/BQW1b
A transgender kid is like a vegan cat - you know who's really making the decisions.