Yes, everyone. Spread the message of civil disobedience. You should not consent to be governed by someone who was not duly elected. Our entire government was not elected but selected, and we are not represented, thus we ought not to be taxed. If half(+) the country revokes their consent to be governed, their power disappears overnight.
Went and picked up a new rifle this morning, am waiting for my background check to finalize tomorrow to go pick up a new shotgun (NJ BS week-long background checks), and I think when I go to pick it up I'll grab another one too. My "rainy day" fund has turned into a "get em while you still can" fund!
Yeah, and what did we do about it? Oh, nothing? That's right.
We were robbed, we were denied justice, we are the victims of perhaps the greatest theft in American history, and we rolled over and took it. And now I see the beginnings of "we'll get them next time!" I'm not saying that there is no path forward, or that we are all doomed, or that recouping and licking our wounds and preparing for the next battle, but we were absolutely manipulated into doing nothing, and what we ought to be doing is preventing people from being manipulated into doing nothing again.
True, but there are MAGA women and soy boy men. I would not deny a woman's right to vote if she were an active participant in the political process... which is why we ought to restrict the vote to landowners. Woman or man, doesn't matter, as long as you pay taxes and have a stake in the system (i.e. you own land).
Plus, although it rarely ever happens this way in the modern era, parties are necessary to allow people with not a lot of money to be able to run for office. Parties help with the funds and logistics of running a modern-day political campaign that would be impossible for one person and their small team to do on their own.
And people are forgetting that EVERY head of the hydra has to come off at once, or it just regrows. Not only are the traitors in Congress going to be there, but also the Obamas and the Clintons, all the major media heads who spun the narratives for the last few years to get Biden "elected", major pedophile celebrities and miscellaneous Hollywood scum, probably lots of Big Tech people, the whole goddamn enchilada. Trump ought to initiate a communications blackout and activate the emergency alert systems, get on TV and lay out the crimes that these people have committed, and let us watch as they round them up.
Putting on the tinfoil hat for a moment, anyone think this could be a coordinated effort by the NWO to create global chaos and governmental collapse, followed by them swooping in to save the day with their "Great Reset"?
See, I’ve always thought that the way that Trump sometimes addressed “COVID” as “the unseen enemy” was a little strange. He’s done it a handful of times in pressers and such, but it always felt weird. COVID is not an unseen or an invisible enemy. Sure, the physical virus can’t be seen with the naked eye, but it’s not invisible to us - we see its effects. I wonder now if when he said “the invisible enemy” he means the people who coordinated this biological, sociological, and political attack on the US and the world? The Great Reset people?
When tyranny becomes law, revolution becomes duty.
Civil disobedience becomes the name of the game. Pay taxes? No, I won't pay taxes because that law was passed by people who committed treason and are therefore disqualified from holding office, and signed by a man who did not win the election to the office which he now occupies.
I'm not denying the absurdity of any theory nor the veracity of the OP's claim, I'm merely pointing out that "arrest" in the context does not mean exactly what you suggested. No need for hostility, pede, we are all in the same boat, and no need for infighting between Q people and non-Q people. We are all Trump supporters and patriots, and that's all that matters.
Not necessarily. Arrest can mean a wide variety of things. Arrest just means being prevented from doing something. What that something is - that's the curious part. Normally, the thing you are prevented from doing when arrested is going anywhere, you are detained for questioning in connection with a crime. Problem is, if Pelosi is arrested, they already know exactly what she did and don't need to question her on anything. If Trump did have Nancy arrested, but wants to keep up the illusion of everything being fine (for whatever reason, whether that be to fool the public or to fool his enemies or something else entirely), this is exactly what he would do - have her go about her day like everything is normal, let her put on her sham little impeachment show, but have agents following her every move and preventing her from doing anything of real consequence. It would also explain her mysterious two-day absence from the House floor a few days ago as they drafted the impeachment articles which Nancy called for - she could have been arrested arrested, questioned and the like (maybe spilled some secrets in a plea bargain?), and temporarily released on the condition she gets a little "security" detail and behaves.
In other words, "Communist shithole mocks greatest country in the world for caring about a man who overdosed on Chinese fentanyl while denying its own use of literal, actual concentration camps against ethnic minorities"
I completely and totally agree, because they truly live by a different set of rules than we do, but another comment noted that this is a privilege afforded to Congress by the Constitution: Article 3, Section 6, Paragraph 1. I'm fine with this specific provision, as it only applies to their security while they do their jobs or are in transit to go do their jobs, and they would still be subject to metal detection and stop and frisk at other buildings just like the rest of us.
Yeah, now is certainly not the time to get all high and mighty and say "Oh we can't stoop to their level!", because clearly this is an uneven playing field. If they had truly beaten us fair and square, then fine, we would deserve it, but they didn't, they cheated, and the only way to prevent them from making the game unwinnable is to play the same game they do.
Eh, I would've felt bad if he was JUST a white-bread, lackluster politician that was there to be the fall guy, but we all know that he is MUCH MUCH worse. Just ask Hunter.