Maybe there is a plan. Maybe there isn't.
Fighting about it here solves nothing except further dividing us. We have the numbers. We have the support. We have the facts. We have God on our side.
We have the high ground, and the only way that we lose, that our movement loses, is if we lose our unity. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.
If there is a Biden administration on the way, then do whatever is necessary. Move your communications to platforms that they cannot touch, and get connected with like-minded people. Stock up on ammunition and guns, they will be much harder to come by. Get involved in local politics, and run for office if you have to - the MAGA momentum is on our side, and local elections are easier to sway. Gather up all of your neighbors and demand that your county and state governments switch to paper ballots. Know your rights, and fight to your last breath to defend them - get a copy of the Constitution if you need a refresher. Continue to redpill your friends, your neighbors, your coworkers - even if you think they are in Stage IV TDS, no one is too far gone. Buy gold and silver, and turn your fake money into something tangible.
This should be obvious, but don't get on the train. Don't let them try to put a star on your arm. Read into Weimar Germany. Read into 1930s Nazi Germany. Read into the Holodomor. Read into China's Glorious Revolution. Learn their playbook. Call them out each time they use it.
In the meantime, watch and wait, be vigilant, and HOLD THE LINE. After Jan. 20th, don't let them move that line a single step further. Thirty years ago, we gave them an inch, and they took almost everything from us. Now's the time for us to return the favor.
Alright everybody. Sorry for the huge wall of text, but I just wanted to get this out there. I want to explain to everybody what Trump's strategy is and encourage all you beautiful bastards to continue to HOLD THE LINE.
The way I see it, the strategy for the election is threefold (Maximize Your Options).
Firstly, you have the main Trump campaign and legal team, as well as various GOP groups and other candidates making challenges in their respective races. The primary goal of this group is to collect and present evidence of widespread voter and election fraud (Get the Word Out). They do this for three main audiences - the public, the legislatures, and the courts - and each serves an important, but separate, role.
If and when the public is convinced of widespread voter and election fraud, public confidence in our elections is completely undermined. This serves the primary purpose of placing pressure on all the important groups to act (Use Your Leverage), and the secondary purpose of providing a 1776-style failsafe, should those groups refuse to act (Fight Back).
If and when the legislatures are convinced of widespread voter and election fraud, they will send their own electors to the Electoral College or will refuse to send electors, which will result in the election of Donald Trump, either through the normal process, or through the contingent election in the House.
If and when the courts are convinced of widespread voter and election fraud, they will issue orders to conduct audits, investigations, and reversals of ballot counts and certifications. This will lead to the inevitable result of Donald Trump's re-election, but more importantly will allow further fraud to be exposed.
Secondly, there is the contingent of Trump's legal team which is solely concerned with Constitutional questions. Did the PA Supreme Court have the authority to expand mail-in balloting? Can the Michigan SOS certify the election after the Detroit canvassers walked back their certification? Think Bush v. Gore. These are the cases which the Supreme Court will take at this moment in time (Know Your Market). If and when other things happen, as listed above, the Supreme Court will face greater pressure to accept wider cases regarding fraud and election integrity, but for right now these Constitutional questions are how the SC will weigh in on the election. Jay Sekulow, who has never lost a case before the SC, is working very diligently in the background on these cases, and they will be plenty enough to win re-election for Donald Trump.
Thirdly, there are the lawsuits filed by Sidney Powell and Lin Wood. Powell and Wood are not playing the short game here. The ultimate goals of the first two branches of this strategy are to assure the re-election of President Donald Trump. Powell and Wood are playing the long game. Their ultimate goal is not to re-elect Trump, although if successful that would certainly be the effect. Their ultimate goal is expose fraud, corruption, criminality, foreign interference, and treason. They are going for the big fish (Deliver the Goods).
Powell and Wood are alleging a LOT of things. Wood, the foremost lawyer in the country on defamation, of all people, should know what happens when you make such bold claims without evidence. They are not fighting civil cases, they are looking to dismantle the Deep State and prove that China and Iran and others have been interfering on the behalf of the Democrats for decades (Think Big).
I'm not a follower of Q myself, but I think that we can all agree that the Deep State is a very real beast. The Swamp runs deep. Following the money leads to the pockets of both some very big names and some very Chinese names. The short game is to get Donald Trump re-elected. Once that occurs, the long game can begin (Protect the Downside and the Upside Will Take Care of Itself). Trump is not gutting the entire Department of Defense right now and replacing people with Trump loyalists so that they can be removed come Jan. 20th. The parts moving behind the scenes are more than a little suspect at this stage in the game, no? We will see very soon if anything comes of this third part of the strategy. The 2018 EO deadline is only a little ways away, and if that turns out to be a big deal? Well, get buckled in for another wild four years, pedes.
Just wanted to throw down some fun numbers so everyone is aware of the truly incredible job our President did in this election.
In the history of our Republic, there have been 20 incumbent elections where the incumbent was re-elected (I'm including 2020 and Cleveland's second election after one term of Harrison, but excluding VPs turned Ps who were not elected themselves for their "first term" as President, sorry Teddy).
In each incumbent election, the general rule is that votes for the incumbent increase, while voter turnout decreases. Votes increasing for the candidate can be the result of a lot of things - population and demographic changes, changes in who is allowed to vote in between election cycles, general approval rate increase, etc. Furthermore, as a general rule, voter turnout usually decreases in these elections, as less people vote in incumbent races. This general rule has held true for 10 of our 20 incumbent elections where the incumbent was successful in seeking re-election.
It is possible for a candidate's vote total to decrease between election cycles, while turnout increases, and this did happen in Roosevelt's 1940 election, but it is much less likely than the general rule, as it most likely means that the voters are enthusiastically moving to the opposition, and therefore the incumbent is much less likely to be re-elected.
What should happen only once in a blue moon is a decrease in voter turnout and in overall votes, that still nets a win for the incumbent. Although these two factors correlate somewhat, a decrease in votes and turnout would seem to indicate a loss of goodwill and a drop in enthusiasm among one's base. This occurred three times, in Roosevelt's 1944 bid, where he faced criticism for seeking a fourth term, and in Obama's 2012 bid, where he lost many of his record-breaking 2008 voters due to policy missteps and general voter apathy. It also occurred in Washington's 1792 run, but Washington ran unopposed, so it's a bit of a special case.
Then, finally, there are those elections which see both an increase in votes, and an increase in turnout. I could say what I believe this is indicative of, but a quick survey of all the years where this phenomenon occurred will make the trend clear. 1812, 1916, 1936, 1984, 2004. These were all elections concerning grave times for the nation - The War of 1812, US Entry into WW1, The Great Depression and the rumblings of WW2, and the Post-9/11 and Iraq War Era. The exception to this rule is Reagan's '84 bid, but we can chalk that up, I think, to Reagan's widespread popular appeal and charisma. The only war that doesn't fit with this trend is the Civil War, where Lincoln's re-election followed the general rule, but that can be chalked up, I think, to Lincoln's controversial wielding of the executive power in his time.
2020 was another one of these moments, with an increase in voter turnout as well as overall votes for the incumbent. I've included my spreadsheet, so you can all take a look at the numbers for yourselves, and see how they stack up. I just wanted to point out, however, that in the 2020 Election, voter turnout increased 6.6%, the largest in history for an incumbent election, a full percentage point more than the turnout between 2000 and 2004 in the post-9/11 era, and that Donald Trump in this election (only referring to the "official count", whereas Trump won many more millions of votes) had an incumbent vote increase of 117%, comparable to Bush's 123% and Reagan's 124%.
Thought y'all might enjoy some number-crunching. Hold the line, pedes, and stay resolute!
TL;DR: According to history, Trump did freakin' AWESOME in this election.
