4
unashamed 4 points ago +5 / -1

Or even finding out why you were placed on the NFL in the first place.

4
unashamed 4 points ago +5 / -1

They probably are airing ads and maybe commentary in between.

1
unashamed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vimeo already took it down. Look for a mirror now

3
unashamed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, I noticed this trend within the past year that all conservatives & groups are labeled “far-right”, while the leftists are given a pass. Hell, they even label Project Veritas as “far-right” “disinformation”.

-1
unashamed -1 points ago +1 / -2

I think there’s agents who truly do their jobs, but you definitely have deep state shills driving an agenda.

2
unashamed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mixing Latin & Greek lol

O Theós to thélei. Molón lavé.

1
unashamed 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's legal now...Crowder devoted a roast to her today, after YouTube dinged him for making fun of a teenager.

6
unashamed 6 points ago +6 / -0

The State claimed that the Ryan Report discrepancy was due to the delay between when and how the counties report their results to the different computer systems used by the state. They claimed that Ryan didn't have the full data, but also couldn't provide the data to refute his findings. Nothing done with it AFAIK.

Basically, just CYA mixed with "nothing to see here, citizen".

2
unashamed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mostly challenging the admissibility of specific votes: late, unverified signatures, wrong location, unregistered voters, nonexistent addresses, etc.

3
unashamed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you, pede. That was the source that I saw on the original article, so sorry about that. Looks like you have an extra character at the end of your link. Thanks for sharing it. http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm

5
unashamed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank the guy that put it together! Crowder mentioned yesterday that none of the evidence was heard, so I needed to find out for myself.

13
unashamed 13 points ago +13 / -0

Thank you. I believe the spreadsheet is talking about Presidential cases, but that one is a good example of a local impact. The headline is slightly misleading though. They did a signature check, but allowed those ballots to count for the Dem. The seat was flipped, however, due to ballots cast in the wrong location, untimely, or by non-voters.

4
unashamed 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think the article headline is a bit click-baity. You're right; basically saying that the overall trend shows Republican, while somehow the Executive went Dem. However, this could lend evidence to the idea that only a few heavily demonrat locales were needed stuff the ballots to sway the presidential tally (e.g. the local seats were secure, but they just needed to override the statewide vote).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›