4
unfiltered 4 points ago +4 / -0

Chapter 1, Section "Gun Control and Genocide", Sub-section "Germany" is on pages 5-7.

First Paragraph reads:

The Weimar Republic, in 1919, confiscated all firearms. In 1928, the firearms ban was relaxed. A law was passed licensing firearms dealers, and establishing a system of permits to purchase firearms and ammunition. As a result of this law, the police had lists of everyone legally owning firearms (of course, criminals, Nazis, and Communists didn’t register their firearms). When Hitler came to power, these lists were used to disarm all opposition to the government, particularly Jews. The Nazi gun law of 1938 essentially banned all private ownership of firearms. However, it specifically exempted from its ban police and military units, the SA (Stormtroopers) and the SS (Blackshirts). That is, government officials and Nazi thugs were allowed weapons; no one else was. All possible opposition to the Nazis was disarmed. Despite a significant degree of opposition to the Nazis among Germans, there was no effective resistance because of the lack of arms.

14
unfiltered 14 points ago +14 / -0

Pretty much. IT guy here. I don't use WiFi in my house unless somebody is staying over and asks me to turn it on. I do have cat-6 wired to a couple rooms and outdoor IP cameras, which record to my own NVR server that cannot be accessed outside of my house. No smart home devices. Fuck Google. Fuck Amazon. Been saying it for years.

2
unfiltered 2 points ago +2 / -0

For all their rhetoric saying they hate guns, yes, many do own guns. Surprisingly, one of the larger markets is the silicon valley elites.

5
unfiltered 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then you need to buy more ammo and put another 11 rounds in there.

2
unfiltered 2 points ago +2 / -0

Resistance to Tyranny is a good one. Doesn't go into extensive detail on the Nazi registration and confiscation, but has a lot of references, more examples (ie USSR, China, Turkey, Uganda), and is a damn good read.

10
unfiltered 10 points ago +10 / -0

We're already terrorists supporting an insurrection. 10 years in a gulag is the least of my concerns.

1
unfiltered 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck it. I say let them go ahead. Let them use HR 127 and pass it. At this point anything they push through I no longer consider a valid United States law.

We're already criminals in their eyes. Terrorists supporting an insurrection.

We will not pay a $200 tax on something we already own and have a constitutional right to own.

We will not volunteer our names for a national registry that will only be used to take our guns away, jail us, or kill us.

When they try to arrest us or take our guns away, we will be armed to the teeth fighting back together, and not in a "peacefully protest" type of way.

by AngryAF
1
unfiltered 1 point ago +1 / -0

She's too ugly to ever be put on a poster

3
unfiltered 3 points ago +3 / -0

We all miss Trump. It's our duty to take down the tyrants and make things right again.

3
unfiltered 3 points ago +3 / -0

Google Image Search comes back with "soy boy trudeau"

1
unfiltered 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bill and Ted's was real. George Carlin was a fucking time traveler.

2
unfiltered 2 points ago +3 / -1

Okay, here's grown up. I appreciate that you were trying to come to the defense of the OP, but this fake headline has been circulating all day. Every time it's posted people have to clarify that it's fake. At a minimum, it's a waste of time. Further, the last thing we need is to be spreading false information to one another. By promoting that this is somehow real, you are doing a disservice to our community.

We are all adults here. We don't need a polite police. If someone is harsh, it's usually with good cause. Like when I tell you to "Fuck off" and call you an "asshole", it's with good cause.

3
unfiltered 3 points ago +4 / -1

Fuck off. You've tried to take over this post promoting the headline is real. It's FAKE. If there's anybody not helping things here it's you asshole.

4
unfiltered 4 points ago +4 / -0

Okay...why don't you try finding the author of who supposedly wrote the article.

You can't, because it's fucking fake.

2
unfiltered 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a good plan, but we need to be fighting this any way we can.

We need to relentlessly keep putting in peoples' faces the factual hard evidence showing:

  • The election was stolen.
  • The deep state politicians are bed with China.
  • Hunter Biden and Joe Biden are pedophiles.
  • The Biden regime sold out their country in exchange for money.
  • The Biden regime does not care about laws unless it is to their benefit.
  • 3 letter agency corruption
  • "Mainstream media" disinformation and lies - they are propaganda machines.
  • Double standards for liberals vs conservatives and elites vs working class.
  • The trampling of our constitutional rights and abuse of power.
  • Complete disregard for national debt.
  • Putting other countries first before America.
6
unfiltered 6 points ago +6 / -0

Or we could just throw him out of a helicopter.

1
unfiltered 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right...so if I had those two guys in a convenience store I'd definitely be keeping my eye on the redneck wearing a sleeveless shirt...even if it does say 'Murica on it.

You don't have to teach me anything about rednecks...I've got a spit cup sitting on my desk.

1
unfiltered 1 point ago +1 / -0

Change the photo of the guy on the right to a white guy, and does your logic still apply?

https://i.maga.host/JAj4P03.png

3
unfiltered 3 points ago +3 / -0

Test again. Good chance the results are bullshit.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›