33
unsquishable 33 points ago +33 / -0

I hope Tucker, Bartiromo etc all leave and make or join a different channel. Any of them with a spine will do.

7
unsquishable 7 points ago +7 / -0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think fudging digital vote tallies requires the presence of a legitimate physical vote.

1
unsquishable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure, just saw the tweet. Not impossible to fake a Facebook post but I hope someone can look into that..

3
unsquishable 3 points ago +3 / -0

That sub is r/politics with a veneer of Conservatism. Almost all the people there are concern trolls and brigaders.

1
unsquishable 1 point ago +1 / -0

True. Still, not heard a convincing argument for electronic voting being better. Did you see this vid? https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPNNbuy/us-programmer-swears-under-oath-/c/

8
unsquishable 8 points ago +8 / -0

This, but they'd probably make some argument against it on the basis of it being easer for a bad actor to compromise by finding flaws/zero day exploits.

1
unsquishable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who in the God damn fuck thought electronic voting machines were a good idea.

3
unsquishable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Normally this would sound so far-fetched and ridiculous that I would disregard it out of hand, but I remember hearing earlier this year some story about strange packages from China with ID cards in them, among others.

22
unsquishable 22 points ago +22 / -0

809677 more voters registered in Michigan than eligible voting population

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKiz9Qi/809677-more-voters-registered-in/

2
unsquishable 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're organized; automod will delete things that don't meet certain prerequisites.

2
unsquishable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pointless - the mods delete anything that goes against their agenda.

2
unsquishable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Surely that headline is wrong?

I only found this article: https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN27M0LC

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›