2
untumulted 2 points ago +2 / -0

My province in Canada:

Federal + Provincial Tax = up to 54%

Pension: 9%

Off the top, then:

6% of my salary for a property tax 1.5% for the fuel tax

Then 15% on any goods and services. Then the death tax.

1
untumulted 1 point ago +1 / -0

Barr was a lawyer for the CIA who helped cover up the JFK assassination under Bush and then was Bush's AG.

2
untumulted 2 points ago +2 / -0

Prescott Bush laundered money for the Nazis. The first director of the CIA helped him. The whole Bush family is based on this money and this connections central in understanding who they are.

The Bush family is what happens when you don't clean seafood and let it go bad, eat it undercooked, get the shits, then a fly eats the shit and shits. They're that fly's shit.

1
untumulted 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, Trump won Georgia, but shouldn't get the electoral votes?

Sounds like a shitty incentive.

1
untumulted 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not enough.

Also, it doesn't make sense if brought to its logical conclusion: Dems just cheat in in Red states. Red states don't get to send electors. Rewards the cheaters.

1
untumulted 1 point ago +2 / -1

Anyone dies within 28 days of taking a vaccine, is a covid vaccine death.

This is the standard they used to try to force this crap on us, it's the standard they now must follow.

4
untumulted 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm insisting that they use the same method they used to count covid deaths to count vaccine deaths:

Anyone who dies within 28 days of getting a vaccine is a vaccine death, no questions asked.

4
untumulted 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lifelong was a CIA project that ended the day Facebook started.

7
untumulted 7 points ago +7 / -0

So...WTF?

Are we going to use the same standard of determining a "vaccine" death that we have used to determine a "covid" death?

Anyone who died within a period in which they had a positive result? In the UK, that period is one month. So, will the vaccine death criteria be "anyone who died within one month of taking a vaccine"? Since the injections are 3 weeks apart, that is a 51 day period. Let's see how that would work out:

UK population: 68m UK average annual deaths: 616k in 2018, 607k in 2017, so lets go with 600k 51 days = 0.14 of a year 0.14 x 600k = 83835 deaths per average 51 days in the UK 1/(1/(83835/68m)) = 1/811

What that means is that if everyone got vaccinated on the same day, normally 83835 people would die in the following 51 days, which is 1 in 811 people in the UK. So, using the exact same criteria as they use for measuring covid deaths, vaccine deaths should be 1 in 811 people (assuming no one dies from the vaccine).

It's not even fair to be honest, since false positive covid results happen all the time and are only rechecked when it's a NFL player or the like.

So, no matter what, there were guaranteed to be "covid deaths".

If 2% of test results are false positives (for comparison, Elon Musk said he did 4 tests, 2 were negative and 2 were positive on the same day and he just said "fuck it, I'll act as if I am positive", then 2% of people tested at death from whatever cause will always be labelled a covid death.

Will we use the same criteria for vaccines?

If not, why is it a suitable criteria for covid?

If, as the CDC said, only around 6% of the deaths can be attributed to covid and those are the very old and very sick, what effect would a vaccine have on them?

In Sweden, the vast majority of covid victims had a life expectancy of 5 - 9 months:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369443/#Sec3title

Those who died of Covid19 in Stockholm’s nursing homes had a life-remaining median somewhere in the range of 5 to 9 months

By comparison, the average 80 year old in Canada has a life expectancy of 9.1 years = 109 months

Do you think providing a vaccine to someone on death's door is wise? How has that benefitted them?

So, what is going to happen?

Let's take a look from a different perspective:

According to the WHO 750m people had had a covid infection as of the beginning of October, at which point there were 1m deaths attributed to covid.

That includes the pre-treatment period, where we were suffocating folks to death.

Hydoxychloroquine reduces the severe effects of covid by 84%.

So, using the numbers from the beginning of October: 750m infections, 1m deaths

1/750 IFR = 1 out of 750 people died overall

with an 84% reduction = 1/4687 IFR

Given the criteria of a "covid death", do you believe that the number of people who die within the time period around taking the vaccine is more or less than 1/4867?

Do you believe these deaths will be reported as "vaccine deaths"?

If not, WTF are you saying you'll be happy to take the vaccine?

1
untumulted 1 point ago +1 / -0

The judge allowed the video's to be released late on the 2nd, she would have been following the decision pretty closely.

2
untumulted 2 points ago +2 / -0

Take turns being the bad guy, put on a conservative face most of the time.

McCain voting down the repeal of Obamacare just allowed another globalist in republican clothing to remain in the shadows, for that vote.

4
untumulted 4 points ago +4 / -0

The destruction of America as a icon of capitalist prosperity needs to happen or they can't make way for their socialist global technocracy.

I firmly believe they were going to kill the petrodollar under Hillary and without local manufacturing, this would be a huge blow for a service-based economy.

Biden is already promising the same: get rid of oil. No oil, why would there be a "petro (leum) dollar"?

Trump got in and showed the world that capitalism is still thriving and the best bet for the world and now they are freaking out. By ignoring the globalized supply chains, not only has Trump made the US less vulnerable to global tyrants that try to dictate industry, he has enriched and provided room for development.

In a short few years, we have Space X happening, perhaps the greatest symbol of the rewards from a private, capitalist system. We have real wage increases, industry and career paths opening up, a re-envisioning of education and they fucking hate it. And they can't contain it.

So, we have fake pandemics and fake elections. Desperate attempts to get their shitty agenda back online.

Fuck them. Enough folks have seen the Trump path to Hold the Line from these globalist fuckwits. .

4
untumulted 4 points ago +4 / -0

They wanted to get caught.

If you know that Trump will win and your goal is to destroy America, what do you do?

Rig the election, badly.

If Biden gets in power, he follows Obama's footsteps and America is on the path to destruction.

If Trump still wins, you have another Russiagate scenario to pin on him and cause riots over and impede.

5
untumulted 5 points ago +5 / -0

Called it 26 days ago:

untumulted 30 points 26 days ago +30 / -0

It's quite funny, Biden is supposed to have 72m votes, but NY only is at 78% reported, meaning, he should have another 900k there.

Cali, at 66% reported, so another 4m. NJ is at 66%, so another 900k there. Another 500K in Or and Wa, and even Texas, 85% reporting means he should be looking at another 750k. Lots of other votes to be counted to add to that.

This means Trump had a total landslide because they need to fake 10s of millions to make it look like Creepy Joe has a chance.

https://thedonald.win/p/11PpBDhtKc/x/c/1ASFhSVdtU

7
untumulted 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think the Catholic Church is the second largest landowner after the Queen of England.

Let them give up theirs if they want to make a point.

1
untumulted 1 point ago +1 / -0

Highly compromised morons

2
untumulted 2 points ago +2 / -0

A basic calculation for the death rate can be found using 2 stats:

The WHO estimates that 750m people have been infected by covid based on antibody test results. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/covid-19-world-in-for-a-hell-of-a-ride-in-coming-months-dr-mike-ryan-says-1.4370626

When the estimates came out, approximately 1m people had died from covid.

That would put the infection fatality rate (IFR) at 1/750 = 0.0013

We know this is an overestimate because many countries define a covid death as anyone who died within 30 days of a positive test.

Also, many people show T-cell immunity to covid (T-cells killed the infection before antibodies had time or need to develop) and are not included in the WHO's 750m cases.

https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563

Buggert’s study in Sweden seems to support this position. Investigating close family members of patients with confirmed covid-19, he found T cell responses in those who were seronegative or asymptomatic.10 While around 60% of family members produced antibodies, 90% had T cell responses. (Other studies have reported similar results.27) “So many people got infected and didn’t create antibodies,” concludes Buggert.

1
untumulted 1 point ago +1 / -0

It means the left/Globalist wanted to destroy America.

The plan was destroy it with a 2016 Hillary win, but that didn't work, and they knew that they couldn't win 2020.

So, they wanted to get caught so they could spin a "Trump Coup", like they did Muh Russia, but this time, for the purpose of a civil war.

4
untumulted 4 points ago +4 / -0

They hoped to use the Paris accord, but when Trump got elected, that fell through and now we have plan B: covid

2
untumulted 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bullshit, cancer samples from Italy in September 2019 show that 11.6% had covid specific antibodies.

It was never deadly, it was all a show.

9
untumulted 9 points ago +10 / -1

99.98% survivable includes the period before we had treatment and they were shoving sick people in nursing homes.

WHO announced at the beginning of October 2020 that 750m people had had covid according to antibody tests. At the time, there were around 1m recorded deaths.

We know that a lot of the deaths were falsely attributed to covid. In the UK, anyone who died within a month of a positive covid test was considered a covid death and lots of other places had arbitrary measures in place for determining a "covid death".

Combine this with the fact that many people never develop antibodies, T-cells were enough to tackle the infection without the need for antibodies. There are multiple studies that show this.

So, we have more than 750m covid cases and less than 1m covid deaths.

1/750 = 99.87% survival rate across the globe.

Of course, since May 18th, despite having around 3300 cases (these are folks who flew into China and were all quarantined while tested and healed), China has had 0 deaths.

Prior to this date, they had around 5% death rate.

5% to a 0% death rate in a few months of handling the disease.

And, I don't care if the numbers are fake, if the numbers are fake, then the earlier numbers are fake too and the whole lockdown nonsense was BS to begin with.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›