3
uruwuits 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem isn't mail in voting, in a small scale it can work because of low numbers. The problem is this mass mail in voting bullshit.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol I remember in teh 2020 election lots of states that had 1% left suddenly had 10% left, and it happened more than once.

4
uruwuits 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do not fucking concede. Mass mail in ballots are a huge security threat. Do not let them take this.

Elections experts untill 2020 have always said that any system that destroys trust in the election is a bad one. And so, mass mail in ballots are objectively a bad system. The dems accuse Trump of starting this "conspiracy" but the fact is that the audits have shown more than enough discrepancies for doubt in the system to be perfectly justified.

There is no room for mass mail in ballots in a 1st world democracy. None. Zero.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

The level of propaganda that it takes from making this man have any approval whatsoever is already making me question the state of information in the world.

1
uruwuits 1 point ago +1 / -0

Explains why it is so shit lol. Hiring based on superficial features rather than skill results in a worse product.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sometimes I wonder how we got airplanes, rockets, advanced maths physics and chemistry when the average human being is this retarded.

4
uruwuits 4 points ago +4 / -0

the vote totals where all they did was fix the fact that maricopa county is too incompetent to not mix the original with the duplicates they made when fixing damaged ballots.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

This generated massive amounts of confusion and it was their bad for not explaining it properly. Dr Shiva's 17 000 duplicates were ballots while Cyber Ninja duplicates that they fixed were just damaged ballot duplicates.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree, there are lots of situations that required further inquiry and explanation and they just leave it at that. Some stuff might be time consuming but is important.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nope.

People are completely mixing up Dr Shiva's 17 000 duplicates with Cyber Ninja's duplicates.

Dr Shiva doesn't provide explanation for the duplicates, just shows that the rate of them increases insanely after the election.

Cyber Ninjas clarify that the duplicates they discounted from the audit are just from damaged ballots that were redone so they could be read by the machines. This is standard practice. Those duplicate ballots are not evidence of fraud, just pollsters fixing damaged ballots.

They removed the duplicates that Maricopa county mixed up with the real ones. They fucked up and mixed duplicates with the originals and counted both.

So after removing such duplicates, Trump does lose votes, but those were a minority, as you saw, trump only lost hundred votes or so.

Dr Shiva's 17 000 duplicates go unexplained he even said that Maricopa never gave an explanation for those.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think so, which is why they removed a bunch of votes from their recount

How were they damaged? No idea, but the practice of copying ballots was pretty widespread, during the election lots of counties did it I remember people asking about it. Maybe transport damages them. I have no clue. It's a minority of votes anyway.

Ultimately at least the part where they mix them together shows either incompetence or malice.

1
uruwuits 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends if other states decide to act on this, if the AG decides to do smth about this. And we always have confirmed evidence that the election was not safe.

3
uruwuits 3 points ago +3 / -0

Here's what the audit did well: It highlighted many security issues of maricopa county. It highlighted that there are a number of votes in question that far over reaches the gap between Trump and Biden.

What it did poorly: Explain what duplicates are, and what their recount was for, and that it wasn't a confirmation that they did everything right. Because that's what hte media ran with.

Does it prove fraud? No. It proves the election was very unsecure and that it is still in question.

It also doesn't prove who won Arizona.

But that wasn't it's goal.

3
uruwuits 3 points ago +3 / -0

Those are not the 17 000 duplicates from Dr Shiva.

Those are the ballots that were duplicated because they were damaged and wouldn't be read by the machines. Those do favour Trump, but were already in the count anyway. All they did was clear up the mess BECAUSE as they claim duplicate ballots were mixed up with the originals.

7
uruwuits 7 points ago +7 / -0

Those are NOT the duplicate ones, those are the ones from people that moved out of state before the deadline and somehow still voted. and it's 39% Biden.

2
uruwuits 2 points ago +2 / -0

Volume 3 still not up for some reason

1
uruwuits 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was just trying to get it. They didnt publish it or forgot to.

It's especially frustrating since it seemsto be the one with the tally. We need all the info.

view more: Next ›