5
user6395 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ha ha, a Bloomberg op-ed. Does that editor at Bloomberg want to get fired?

1
user6395 1 point ago +1 / -0

Calculated wins by politicians is how the world got controlled by elites who do stuff that all of us will get hanged or shot for. A wholesale illegal farce was conducted, and she chooses the calculated win? Okay. She has Utterly Failed. Not a leader but a piece of political self- and career-preserving trash.

2
user6395 2 points ago +2 / -0

In my humble opinion, she can f--k off with her calculated win. I have no respect for such vermin. Too weak to make a stand.

3
user6395 3 points ago +3 / -0

You got the "school children" thing absolutely correct. Her wikipedia bio indicates that she was in political and activist groups since her teens. Looks like she's still doing her teenager stuff, namely, "rationalizing" decisions, or "representing her constituents", rather than putting her foot down and doing the right f--cking thing. Not A Leader. Just a career leech. Looking Out For Number One, always.

6
user6395 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fun and games, what a time to be alive. Nancy's vodka consumption must be sky-high these days.

2
user6395 2 points ago +2 / -0

A good leak. Durham's progress appear to be far enough that they are starting to leak selectively. This week, I don't recall seeing Brennan or Clapper defending the pussy Corney. Hey, Corney is still quiet after the Barr interview, what a traitorous pussy.

3
user6395 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now they are doing the "shouting at each other" thing and the legal dance. Law prof Feldman's op-ed in Bloomberg is certainly a thump on liberals' thick heads. Have fun everyone! Like any deplorable, I'm proud to embrace peach mints. Also, from now on, I will look at turtles with more respect.

2
user6395 2 points ago +2 / -0

The spouse thinks the husband is a good man. Ahahahahahahaha. I'll give her some more days of delusion, then it will break into a million pieces when the shitstorm blows in.

2
user6395 2 points ago +2 / -0

So many people are getting cute with numbers these days. 187. Barr with the 7. Guess I underestimated turtle Mitch.

3
user6395 3 points ago +3 / -0

Barr is calling out the little pussy. Let's see if the pussy wants to show its fangs or just stick to being a little pussy.

2
user6395 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lindsey is a funny bitch. Lindsey 2.0 sounded cool and righteous. This Lindsey just wants to muck things up, sow some chaos. He is confusing me. Maybe the enemy will be confused too.

10
user6395 10 points ago +10 / -0

One rule for the peasants, another rule for aristocrats. She thinks aristocratic rules applies to her, so it's all good. A Dem, so that's no surprise. Evidently abusing political financing rules makes her frisky and she can't control herself. This woman missed her vocation. She should be in a Nevada whorehouse, a Katie Hill in a veil. Personally, I wouldn't touch that with a 10-foot pole. I would use a shotgun instead.

1
user6395 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no contradiction in their minds. They are the elite. We are just the peasants. They revel in their elite status because they have done things we peasants will be hanged for. Hence, it was natural and normal for them to call us deplorables. There will be a reckoning.

1
user6395 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, you all should see Sun UK, the uber loser Jeremy Corbyn was sulking and did not speak at all to Boris. What a hoot!

8
user6395 8 points ago +8 / -0

Evil globalists' standard way of doing things -- lie. It was Jean-Claude Juncker the EU President at that time who supposedly said: "When it becomes serious, you have to lie." The fact that the Dems and the media are now engaged in wholesale bald-faced lying by the truckload means that things are really serious and they have abandoned any semblance of normality -- perhaps their very survival is at stake.

1
user6395 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, you should not use a candy pattern. I hear pizza patterns and assorted spirals are way more popular with Dem politicians.

3
user6395 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a sham impeachment because the whole thing will never pass muster with Judiciary, assuming the latter has been turned and is on our side. It will never have any actual bite. Why does Senate have to accept an illegal document? Nah. So Nancy's team of legal vermin will need to think about pursuing this by going around the normal process. Let's see what they try.

3
user6395 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, they are uber morons for sure if they think this impeachment is the Dems hitting back hard. Carry on lemmings. Oh, tell the Bezos asshole who is your boss that all is well and Nancy will soon have the upper hand. It's always nice to let the bad guys distract themselves with happy thoughts before the shitstorm blows in.

3
user6395 3 points ago +3 / -0

If he can be a "top Democrat" then it must have been with the blessings of higher powers. How many hours of blackmail tape does all the rogue intelligence agencies have on him? What a hoot.

3
user6395 3 points ago +3 / -0

They live in a very insulated world. They think the fake Jorge B is a nice pope. They do not know that George HW somehow cannot remember where he was on 22 November, 1963. They do not know that we are at war with evil.

11
user6395 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep, we are not going to forget what they have done, nor are we going to forgive them. I want the Dems to be begging Barr for a ticket to Gitmo to escape the wrath of the people.

1
user6395 1 point ago +1 / -0

Candidate Trump was also supposed to crater R chances in the election. They keep underestimating him. Or rather, the Dems have been cornered and there are no good ways to fight back. In adopting this strategy, the Ds are scraping the barrel. I don't think Dems are all stupid people. I submit that they wouldn't run with a desperate strategy if Barr or Durham were pussies.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›