1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

And another 4,000 / day until the election, no?

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah, yes, sorry. They went way over to the left, then looked back and asked, "What are you doing way over there to the right?"

But we haven't moved.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very insightful! I saw that same story, but I hadn't connected the dots like this.

3
Vir4030 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, he did start an office down the street from which he intended to organize a resistance effort.

17
Vir4030 17 points ago +17 / -0

Protest voting is totally a thing. Lots of people voted for Clinton because they hated Trump, not because they liked Clinton. People will vote for Trump because they hate Whitmer. That includes Democrats, for sure.

0
Vir4030 0 points ago +7 / -7

Isn't John Roberts more of a centrist? Isn't he trying to play both sides? He doesn't just agree with the left wing.

If Hillary had been elected, and I assume you also mean she got the House at least, not sure the Senate was really possible. John Roberts would be firmly in the conservative wing sure as you're putting him in the liberal wing now. But it would still be 6-3 liberal majority on the court, rock solid. As solid as the 5-4 conservative majority now.

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

Chicago 'pede here. Illinois votes to retain judges every two years. They require a three-fifths majority to maintain their position. So many people vote to retain all that it is rare to have a removal. It has happened only once since 1994.

My grandmother always kept a list when she would see something in the news so she would know who to vote out. I have no idea, so I just always vote NO to every one of them. That way, it will help people's voices count. In fact, they voted 10 judges out in 1990 simply because enough people did that.

Since I have started voting, I have never voted to retain a judge. Michael Toomin will be the first. Thank you for this great information.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's also in one of the leaks from his laptop where there's a video of him chatting with some woman online and his username is the same as that reddit account.

5
Vir4030 5 points ago +6 / -1

So, I read through it, first of all. If it's not actually Hunter, it's a fantastic coincidence. Have you heard of the song Shadilay?

Hunter Biden had a shell company once called "GK Temujin LLC" and this Reddit account is named "temujin01."

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +3 / -1

Step 2: attack Trump for conflict of interest:

Let's also not forget that Trump might have a directly conflict of interest by owning stocks that would benefit directly from the Keystone pipelines being built.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no such thing as an ex-Trump supporter.

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

None of this takes into account fraud, either.

8
Vir4030 8 points ago +8 / -0

DO NOT let these slimy corrupt IL politicians fool you, this is a TAX HIKE in sheep's clothing.

My first hint was all the ads I was seeing. This is well-funded.

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now do the ones who knelt while on duty.

3
Vir4030 3 points ago +3 / -0

I always thought that parents' had a huge role to play in how their children turned out. I held my breath on this opinion until after I had children. My wife and I put a lot of time and energy into them, and they are responsive, creative, sweet, and very smart. Someone didn't put a lot of time or energy into Hunter, that's for sure.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

Back again in Waukesha? That's two weekends in a row. Someone must be telling him to keep coming back.

Any idea how early you needed to get there to get in?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›