4
voiceofreason 4 points ago +5 / -1

Actually, it sounds like it was a guy steward in this case who put up a stink (who I guess had the stewardess be the one to kick them off). I actually think most women are somewhat reasonable, and a mother's instinct is not to cover the nose and mouth of their 2-year-old. Although there are plenty on the other side of the spectrum.

I guarantee you that whoever came up with this COVID scam to strip us of our freedoms was not a woman.

I also think more women would be standing up for our rights too if they saw their husbands doing it and not being passive.

11
voiceofreason 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nope - it's 2 and up on airplanes now. We just flew with our 2-year-old, they didn't enforce it, but did ask me how old she was and told me that she needed to put one on. I said ok (but didn't do anything) and that was the end of it.

1
voiceofreason 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's give the man a few weeks off... he deserves a break.

3
voiceofreason 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no way. If this graph is truly before dominion flips, then Colorado dems must have been cheating another way. I’ve lived in Colorado my whole life, and the support for Trump/Republicans was at highest levels in my lifetime. Colorado is red. The senate race was one of the closest in the nation - both hickenlooper and Gardner poured massive amounts of money in, and polls were neck and neck - then hickenlooper won by a landslide. They cheated big. Colorado is red.

6
voiceofreason 6 points ago +8 / -2

There is no way. If this graph is truly before dominion flips, then Colorado dems must have been cheating another way. I’ve lived in Colorado my whole life, and the support for Trump/Republicans was at highest levels in my lifetime. Colorado is red. The senate race was one of the closest in the nation - both hickenlooper and Gardner poured massive amounts of money in, and polls were neck and neck - then hickenlooper won by a landslide. They cheated big. Colorado is red.

2
voiceofreason 2 points ago +2 / -0

Believe me - it is not easy work that they do and they definitely don’t get much sleep at night. Just none of it is on the up and up. I would not trade positions with a swamp rat under any circumstances!

1
voiceofreason 1 point ago +1 / -0

Find a church where people are meeting - they are all over the place. They are full of people who love God and know it's more important to meet than to follow unconstitutional orders.

6
voiceofreason 6 points ago +6 / -0

according to dominion voting machines

5
voiceofreason 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've been thinking about that - if we're right, and there are only 30% actual democrat voters out there, even if we 'split' the GOP, we only need 40% (RINOs can have the last 30%) to be the majority. This of course relies on election integrity, which we would have to fight like hell for.

4
voiceofreason 4 points ago +5 / -1

The best way I’ve learned to “cope” is reading the Bible. To know that there is a source of truth that is not manipulated or “fake news” that comes from the creator of the universe himself and is applicable to current situations is comforting and refreshing.

“For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart. “ -Hebrews 4:12

5
voiceofreason 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't think more justices would reduce the workload - it would probably even slow it down. Unless they divided up the cases (which would defeat the purpose of the court being 'supreme').

1
voiceofreason 1 point ago +1 / -0

“If Texas prevails, the four state legislatures could follow any number of courses in appointing their presidential electors. They could assess the election results and try to exclude those ballots that were counted in violation of state law in order to determine a winner, or they could divide their Electoral College votes between the two candidates, or they could follow a different path.”>

Am I interpreting this wrong then? That was the first I’d heard of “dividing electoral college votes”

2
voiceofreason 2 points ago +3 / -1

If my math is right, if these 4 states divide up their votes evenly, that only moves 31 votes to Trump which doesn’t get him to 270. How realistic is that scenario?

8
voiceofreason 8 points ago +8 / -0

they knew it took exactly 120 minutes to fix the leak, but they are not sure if people were there or not?

5
voiceofreason 5 points ago +5 / -0

We can win this battle and change to paper ballots with voter ID and fingerprints. Withhold federal funding from states who don’t get on board.

5
voiceofreason 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is big. Does this imply the “fix” was implemented on all machines in Georgia?

view more: Next ›