5
vongregormench 5 points ago +5 / -0

there are some claims that there was an informant around Trump. This will later be noticed as another example of the FBI spying on Trump yet again and will be subsequently memory holed when they realize that they again have nothing and were caught trying to frame him.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

is this going to be like the guy in a truck in front of a federal building last year? Memory holed when it turns out to be another fed informant.

2
vongregormench 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were not fools. By allowing the FBI in the first time they've absolved Trump of any possible excuse to charge him with a crime. There is no willful concealment of presidential records if they willingly allowed the FBI to come.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Siege is a silly word here. That indicates resistance, which there was none. The FBI had to lie about the cooperation from Trump to be granted that warrant. Even the most compromised judge would not grant a warrant to raid a location that the FBI was already allowed to visit with no resistance. It's also a location which is under the protection of another federal agency; the Secret Service. There are several FBI agents here that likely broke the law (and of course nothing will happen to them).

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are they black males?

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even though Intel is still vastly outnumbered, how much do you want to bet that their working environment is so much more sane because liberals know that at least a few people around them won't accept all their insanity.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the feds are far stupider than that and that their raid was just dumb and pompous, but they absolutely would take advantage of the situation if they could.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

What kind of documents do the expect to find? Do they think that Trump wrote down that he was going to overthrow the government?

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some triggered retard wrote an essay making shit up out of their own head. The justices are basing their decisions on law. The law has never created any separation of church and state in the way leftists imagine it. Congress is not supposed to favor a religion. That’s not the same as separating religion from our government. That was never intended. The left thinks that not being able to impose atheism is somehow Christianity being imposed upon them.

7
vongregormench 7 points ago +7 / -0

They’re fine with threats to law enforcement when it comes from anifa or black supremacists.

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +3 / -0

When someone makes it clear they’re trying to frame you it’s retarded to help them. The left is truly dumb.

2
vongregormench 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh my god. This is up there with some of Trump's funniest messages.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +2 / -1

I highly doubt they planted anything. They raided Rudy Giulianni and got jack shit. They're stupider than you think they are. Planting something would be difficult to get away with and would carry severe consequences for being caught. I think the more likely outcome is that the DOJ continues to harass Republicans until they win or we win.

14
vongregormench 14 points ago +14 / -0

Violence is only ok when perpetrated by the state!!!

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Handshake. Absolutely a fed.

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are a whole bunch of parts of our government that have the potential to be abused. The reason people doubted Ron Paul was that they didn't expect Americans to actually abuse the system the way they have. When you have a ruthless political party that has no boundaries then you have to assume they'll abuse whatever they can.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rich people hire tax attorneys and win their cases. Average people can’t afford to.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

I write this every fucking time I see these posts because no one seems capable of absorbing this information. This is all from the original 40 billion dollar allocation. It’s not an additional 4 billion, it’s part of that original bill. They didn’t just ship a pallet of cash to Ukraine when they passed the 40 billion. They have to determine how to spend it still.

view more: Next ›