1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guess what, there are ties and that doesn't fucking matter one bit. It's not a crime to associate with people, even people who have committed a crime.

12
vongregormench 12 points ago +12 / -0

We all have talent on loan from god. Don’t squander it. Make the most of what has been given to you.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Send the Iraqi military some satellite photos and tell them to do it themselves.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m trying to be fair here. What would Trump have done? I know he would have voiced concern, like a real president, but what would he have been able to do? It’s not like you can fix frozen pipes and the electrical grid with a fleet of trucks or ships.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do they know what the word grifter means? How was this a grift? He became president. It cost him a shitload of money to do so. What was the scheme to make money? Even if it didn't work, what was the grift?

6
vongregormench 6 points ago +9 / -3

Well I can understand the action of giving a TOS violation to a call to violence. That's just Milo pushing buttons if true. It is ok to have some level of standards on your social media website, but the real concern is that the rules are applied to everyone and they're not arbitrary.

2
vongregormench 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see no point in infighting here. I’ll give both a chance. I’ve already got accounts for both.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are up against the forces of satan. Satan motivates the evil to go against the truth tellers. Good people don't go after people in the society that are merely carrying out a duty (in this case to represent a defendant in our justice system).

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +3 / -0

What is the source of the data? I have heard Lindel never reveals where this data is from. This is important if you want it to be considered proof.

5
vongregormench 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pretty sure something that couldn’t happen accidentally if it took several minutes of effort to do it. You can’t accidentally add a graphic in to an image.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just from a scientific perspective, I wonder why California seems to be rising exponentially. I don't think the restrictions have made any difference one way or another, and I don't think we can easily determine what's going on just by looking at this graph. This could be like the climate hockey stick where if you zoom out (wait more time in this case) the graph evens out. Why did Illinois go down so much?

3
vongregormench 3 points ago +3 / -0

When will the SC hear a case like that? I haven’t heard of such a thing. If they’re hearing that case then some police department somewhere already thinks they can do this.

8
vongregormench 8 points ago +8 / -0

I buy the real stuff. I put it in a little pouring bowl with spout and heat it up. What I don’t use out of it I put back in the jar. The syrup is like 15 bucks a jar, but it goes for a couple years, at least at the rate we use it. If I had 5 kids it might be too expensive.

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

no one deserves to enjoy the superbowl. I enjoyed it though.

12
vongregormench 12 points ago +19 / -7

Sorry. The process of converting to another party will take a couple of elections and during that time the democrats will alter the constitution irreparably. Parties changed in the past during times when the opposition party generally agreed with the concepts in the constitution. It's not a viable strategy now. You're guaranteeing a loss by advocating this path. There's nothing wrong with the strategy of taking over the republican party. We've already made significant progress.

13
vongregormench 13 points ago +13 / -0

Totally insane. Neither statement claimed election fraud. Pool’s statement isn’t about fraud, it’s about creating conditions where fraud is easier, and the second part is about manipulating the voters by lying to them. Fairbanks is claiming that a van was engaged in suspicious activity. It isn’t alleging fraud either. It’s showing activity that warrants explanation, and it could show voter fraud but there is no claim of voter fraud anywhere in either tweet. Twitter is censoring something that isn’t even present.

13
vongregormench 13 points ago +13 / -0

It says that Trump won 14 lawsuits, but it doesn't list them. Could anyone tell me what the rulings were and how those affect things going forward?

1
vongregormench 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Democrats have proposed rules to increase the fraud and the Republicans have not been nearly vocal enough about their efforts. They actually had something in the first house bill to allow ballots to be printed at home nation wide.

view more: Next ›