12
walt 12 points ago +13 / -1

Dude you OBVIOUSLY don't know Lindsey Graham...this is THE Lindsey Graham we're talking about...Lindsey Graham 2.0 ?? ... I GUARANTEE you this guy will be sending out the STERNEST of letters...SAVAGE just you wait

by maxkenn
3
walt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some are RINOs, Some are old and clueless.

4
walt 4 points ago +4 / -0

They want the admissions process to be entirely subjective, so they can freely discriminate as they choose. When the process is objective you can easily point out discrepancies and discriminatory practices.

7
walt 7 points ago +7 / -0

You have also have the right to equal justice under the law, but we don't see Comey, Brennan, or Clapper being charged with lying under oath.

5
walt 5 points ago +5 / -0

The speed at which their narrative can take a complete 180° turn while simultaneously cancelling anyone who disagrees with it defies logic.

It's very similar to how Orwell described the Soviet's handling of speech regarding Nazi Germany.

When the Soviets were allied with Nazi Germany, people in the USSR who spoke negatively of the Nazis were cancelled. Almost overnight, when Germany invaded the Soviet Union, the opposite became the case. Now you were cancelled for speaking positively of the Nazis. A standard their past-selves from 24 hours before would have violated.

4
walt 4 points ago +4 / -0

They were not old buildings, they already had modern technology. But you could totally build them with the same external appearance while completely redesigning the interior.

1
walt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Google is a hand of the US government. China knows this, and they do not allow Google to operate within its borders as a result.

The US Constitution prevents government institutions from taking certain actions that concern the rights of US citizens. Private companies, on the other hand, are not bound by these restrictions.

By using the front of a private company, US government institutions have legal cover to violate your Constitutional rights. I've been saying for years that we need to extend the Bill of Rights to cover not only government actions, but also the actions of private companies.

If an action is too egregious for our government to perform, why is it OK for Google to perform the same action?

5
walt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same mayor who got her hair styled while she closed the barbers for everyone else. She's literally an insane narcissist...She doesn't even realize what she's doing is wrong. She thinks she has more rights than every other American.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/chicago-mayor-defends-hairstylist-visit-amid-coronavirus-outbreak-n1181546

3
walt 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's power in numbers...they can't fire the whole force. What good is their union if they haven't learned to organize?

3
walt 3 points ago +3 / -0

She rightfully called out ilham omar as an anti semite

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›